VMware 5V0-62.22 Exam - Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-62.22 exam

Question #: 8
Topic #: 4

Refer to the exhibit.

A company has created a compliance policy with the following rules:

Recently, the Android device was marked as non-compliant. The VMware Workspace ONE UGM administrator found that the Facebook application was installed on the device and that a passcode was not present. However, after the user removed the Facebook app and created a device passcode, the Android device still shows as non-compliant in the VMware Workspace ONE UEM console. Other devices within this organization all show as compliant.

Which two root causes could possibly cause this problem? (Choose two.)

AThe device has not checked in with the Workspace ONE UEM tenant.

BThe Policy Engine Service is not running

CThe Interrogator Queue Service is not running.

DThe Android device operating system version is lower than 8.0.0

EThe device is not enrolled into Workspace ONE UEM.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

The two root causes that could possibly cause this problem are that the device has not checked in with the Workspace ONE UEM tenant, and that the Policy Engine Service is not running.The device check-in is a process that updates the device status and information in the Workspace ONE UEM console3. If the device has not checked in with the Workspace ONE UEM tenant, it will not receive the latest compliance policy or report its compliance status. The Policy Engine Service is a service that evaluates and enforces compliance policies on devices. If the Policy Engine Service is not running, it will not be able to detect or remediate non-compliant devices. The administrator should check and resolve any issues with device check-in and Policy Engine Service.

by Sylvia at Oct 21, 2023, 02:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-62.22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jerlene

3 months ago

If the OS version is below 8.0.0, that could be a problem as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nina

3 months ago

The Policy Engine Service not running sounds likely too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hector

3 months ago

Wait, how can it still be non-compliant after removing the app?

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

4 months ago

Totally agree, that could definitely be the issue!

upvoted 0 times

...

Candra

4 months ago

The device hasn't checked in with the Workspace ONE UEM tenant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Garry

4 months ago

I thought the Android version being lower than 8.0.0 could be a factor, but I’m not confident if that directly affects compliance status. Maybe option D is a possibility?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hassie

4 months ago

I feel like we had a practice question about services not running, and it was about the Interrogator Queue Service. I wonder if that's relevant here too, like option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think if the Policy Engine Service isn't running, it might not enforce the compliance rules properly. That could relate to option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Armando

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how devices need to check in regularly to update their compliance status. So, option A could definitely be a reason.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused here. If the user fixed the issues, why is the device still showing as non-compliant? I'll need to look closely at the policy rules and the Workspace ONE UEM console to figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. The Android device was marked as non-compliant, but the user removed the Facebook app and added a passcode. That's a good start, but there must be something else going on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emelda

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the details and think through the possible root causes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonja

5 months ago

Alright, let's think this through step-by-step. The key details seem to be that the device is still non-compliant, even after the user made the changes. I'll focus on the possible root causes listed and try to eliminate the ones that don't fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosita

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Can someone clarify what "false emanations" means in this context? I want to make sure I'm understanding it correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know a call option is in the money when the market value is higher than the strike price, but I'm not totally confident that's the right answer. I'll have to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolf

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which actions are most relevant to the application discovery process.

upvoted 0 times

...