Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 8 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-21.21 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 8
[All 5V0-21.21 Questions]

data centers, the customer relayed the following information:

* Highest possible mitigation during a host failure in terms of capacity.

* A constraint in this year's IT budget.

What should the architect recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Performance services and IOinsight Metrics used for performance analysis. Operation reserve for internal VSAN operations. https://blogs.vmware.com/virtualblocks/2020/09/24/effective-capacity-management-with-vsan-7-update-1/


by Trinidad at Nov 21, 2025, 10:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-21.21 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sheldon
2 days ago
I like option D for smaller setups, but it might not meet the capacity needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
7 days ago
Option C sounds excessive. Six nodes? That’s way over budget!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
12 days ago
I agree with Audry. Three nodes can still provide good mitigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
17 days ago
Wait, can we really manage with just 2 ROBO nodes? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
23 days ago
Agree, 3 nodes should be enough for mitigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
28 days ago
Enabling performance services with 6 nodes? That's a lot!
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
1 month ago
I think 4 nodes is overkill for a budget constraint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
1 month ago
A minimum cluster of 3 vSAN nodes sounds reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
2 months ago
A) sounds good, but 3 nodes might not be enough for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the architect is scratching their head on this one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
2 months ago
C) is overkill for this scenario, 6 nodes is too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
2 months ago
I'd go with D) to save on the IT budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
3 months ago
B) seems like the best option to meet the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I’m uncertain if the extra node is justified given the budget limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the budget constraint might push us towards option A with 3 nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
3 months ago
I think enabling operations reserve makes sense for capacity during a host failure, but I can't recall if 3 nodes is enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
3 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of having enough nodes for redundancy, but I'm not sure if 3 or 4 is the right number for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which option would be the best fit. I'd need to do some more research on the specific capabilities and trade-offs of each configuration to make a fully informed recommendation. Maybe I'll jot down a few notes and come back to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Given the requirement for high availability and the budget constraint, I think the best recommendation would be option A - enabling the operations reserve and using a minimum 3 node vSAN cluster. This should provide good failover protection without breaking the bank.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
4 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The customer wants the highest possible mitigation during a host failure, but they have a budget constraint this year. Based on that, I'm thinking option B might be the way to go - the 4 vSAN node cluster should provide good redundancy while staying within the budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
4 months ago
I think option A is the best. Three nodes should be enough for capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
5 months ago
But we have a budget constraint. Option B might be too costly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The information provided is a bit vague, and there are a few different options to consider. I'll need to carefully weigh the tradeoffs between the different configurations to determine the best recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward - it's asking for the best recommendation to meet the customer's requirements of high availability and a constrained budget. I think the key is to balance the capacity needs with the budget constraint.
upvoted 0 times
Man
4 months ago
Yeah, a minimum of 3 vSAN nodes sounds reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
4 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It balances capacity and budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
5 months ago
True, but it might stretch the budget too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel