An administrator wants to check the performance metrics for the workloads and their virtual disks that are running on a vSAN cluster, but no statistical charts are displayed in the vSphere client.
Why is this behavior being seen?
: Some tools allow for measuring latency peaks. This unfortunately isn't ideal, as it can unfairly represent statistical outliers, which may very well occur when there is little to no I/O activity. The best way to understand the actual behavior of VM and application latencies is to observe in time based performance graphs. Depending on the level of detail, you may need to measure at the individual VMDK level. Become familiar with these graphs to determine what is normal, and what is not for that given application. This is where you can use built-in functionality of vCenter and the vSAN performance service metrics to gather this information.
An organization has two vSAN clusters managed by the same vCenter server, each providing 100 TB of storage. The first cluster runs at 75% of its storage capacity, and the second cluster runs at 40% of its storage capacity.
The company also has the following:
* an iSCSI array of 300 TB, which runs at 76% of its capacity
* a NAS system of 200 TB, which runs at 10% of its capacity
* a Fiber channel (FC) array of 300 TB, which runs at 80% of its capacity
The administrator is asked to add an additional 25 TB of storage to the first cluster but is also made aware that there is no budget to purchase new hardware and that the vSAN Storage Policy Based Management must be kept in place.
Which storage option will work for this use case?
An architect is tasked with designing a solution that includes the following requirements:
* The solution must support 5,000 virtual machines.
* The solution must include software defined storage.
* The deployment of the solution must be automated.
* The solution must provide storage-policy based disaster recovery for all workloads.
Which combination of three products will fulfill these requirements? (Choose three.)
An organization has two vSAN clusters managed by the same vCenter server, each providing 100 TB of storage. The first cluster runs at 75% of its storage capacity, and the second cluster runs at 40% of its storage capacity.
The company also has the following:
* an iSCSI array of 300 TB, which runs at 76% of its capacity
* a NAS system of 200 TB, which runs at 10% of its capacity
* a Fiber channel (FC) array of 300 TB, which runs at 80% of its capacity
The administrator is asked to add an additional 25 TB of storage to the first cluster but is also made aware that there is no budget to purchase new hardware and that the vSAN Storage Policy Based Management must be kept in place.
Which storage option will work for this use case?
Which three steps are required to decommission a stretched cluster and convert it to a standard vSAN cluster? (Choose three.)
Donte
1 months agoMatt
2 months agoVallie
3 months agoOretha
3 months agoAmie
4 months agoMoon
4 months agoKanisha
4 months agoEthan
5 months agoMira
5 months agoVerda
5 months agoNichelle
6 months agoSusana
6 months agoBeckie
6 months agoKrystal
7 months agoSerina
7 months agoAmos
7 months agoJanella
7 months agoGeraldine
7 months agoRossana
8 months agoSimona
8 months agoBilly
9 months agoJeannetta
10 months agoDonette
10 months agoAileen
11 months ago