New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 7 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-21.21 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 7
[All 5V0-21.21 Questions]

An organization has two vSAN clusters managed by the same vCenter Server, each providing 100TB of storage. The first cluster runs at 75% of its storage capacity, and the second cluster runs at 50% of its storage capacity.

The company also has the following:

* An iSCSI array of 300TB. which runs at 76% of its capacity

* A NAS system of 200TB, which runs at 10% of its capacity

* A Fiber channel (FC) array of 300TB, which runs at 80% of its capacity

The administrator is asked to add an additional 25TB of storage to the first cluster. The administrator is also made aware that there is no budget to purchase new hardware and that the vSAN Storage Policy Based Management must be kept in place.

Which storage option will work for this use case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Audry
3 months ago
Definitely need to stick with the existing policies, so B is solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
3 months ago
Surprised they can't just buy more hardware for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
3 months ago
HCI Mesh sounds cool, but is it really necessary here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
4 months ago
I disagree, I think C could work too with the FC storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice since the NAS is only at 10% capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
4 months ago
I feel like the NAS option is the safest bet here, but I wonder if the vSAN policies would complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
4 months ago
HCI Mesh sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it can pull from the second cluster's datastore effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to consider existing storage utilization. The FC storage is at 80%, so that might not be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think using the NAS storage could be a good option since it's only at 10% capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the best option is to obtain additional free capacity from the existing iSCSI storage. It's the only storage option that has enough available capacity to meet the 25TB requirement without needing to purchase new hardware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the HCI Mesh concept. Is that something we can actually do in this scenario? I'm not familiar with that, so I'll need to research it a bit more before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
I think the key here is that we need to find additional storage capacity without purchasing new hardware. The FC array is at 80% capacity, so that's not an option. The iSCSI array is at 76% capacity, so that might be worth looking into.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The first cluster is at 75% capacity, so we can't use that. The NAS is only at 10% capacity, so that could work. But the question says we can't buy new hardware, so I'm not sure that's an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the storage options and capacities to determine the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
5 months ago
I think the best approach here is option C - installing certificates on the switches and making sure CPsec is enabled on the MC. That will provide the strongest security for the control channel communications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
5 months ago
I know smart contracts are related, but I don't think a blockchain *is* a smart contract. Maybe they're all connected somehow?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I think geographic location might also play a role... it seems like different places have different health risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. I know the core areas of CSR include environmental, social, and governance factors. I think I can narrow this down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is the bid price - that's the price the market maker is willing to pay for the security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
9 months ago
Alright, let's see... NAS, FC, iSCSI... Sounds like a delicious Italian pasta dish to me. Where's the garlic bread?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
9 months ago
Wait, wait, wait. You want me to HCI Mesh the vSAN clusters? Is that like some kind of dance move? I'm in!
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
8 months ago
D) Create an HCI Mesh using the second cluster's datastore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
8 months ago
C) Obtain additional free capacity from the existing FC storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
8 months ago
B) Obtain additional free capacity from the existing NAS storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
9 months ago
A) Create an HCI Mesh using the first cluster's datastore.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hillary
10 months ago
Hold up, you're telling me I can't buy new hardware? What is this, a haunted house? I'm outta here.
upvoted 0 times
Davida
8 months ago
C) Obtain additional free capacity from the existing FC storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
8 months ago
B) Obtain additional free capacity from the existing NAS storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
9 months ago
A) Create an HCI Mesh using the first cluster's datastore.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
10 months ago
Nah, the NAS system is way under-utilized, only 10% used. That's gotta be the way to go. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Teri
8 months ago
A) Create an HCI Mesh using the first cluster's datastore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
9 months ago
C) Obtain additional free capacity from the existing FC storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
9 months ago
B) Obtain additional free capacity from the existing NAS storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cyril
10 months ago
The iSCSI array seems like the obvious choice here, with 76% utilization and 300TB of capacity. Why not just use that?
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
9 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
10 months ago
Using the existing FC storage with 80% utilization might be risky, it's better to consider other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
10 months ago
The iSCSI array is already being used heavily, it might not be a good idea to add more load to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jessenia
11 months ago
I'm not sure about option A. Maybe we could also consider option B and obtain additional free capacity from the existing NAS storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
11 months ago
I agree with Carey. Option A seems like the best choice to add storage without purchasing new hardware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
11 months ago
I think option A could work by creating an HCI Mesh using the first cluster's datastore.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel