Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 3 Question 62 Discussion

During a vSAN design workshop, an architect collected these customer requirements:* Leverage vSAN storage policies with Erasure Coding.* Enable Deduplication and Compression.* Use the minimum number of hosts in the cluster.* Maintain full storage policy compliance when two nodes are down.Which vSAN cluster design meets the customer's requirements?
A) Five nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster and C) Six nodes Hybrid vSAN cluster
B) Six nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
D) Five nodes Hybrid vSAN cluster

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 3 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-21.21 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 3
[All 5V0-21.21 Questions]

During a vSAN design workshop, an architect collected these customer requirements:

* Leverage vSAN storage policies with Erasure Coding.

* Enable Deduplication and Compression.

* Use the minimum number of hosts in the cluster.

* Maintain full storage policy compliance when two nodes are down.

Which vSAN cluster design meets the customer's requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/8.0/vsan-administration/GUID-CA9CF043-9434-454E-86E7-DCA9AD9B0C09.html


by Carmelina at Jun 29, 2024, 10:28 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-21.21 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bronwyn
10 months ago
Erasure Coding and Deduplication? Sounds tricky with fewer hosts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
10 months ago
Wait, can you really maintain compliance with just five nodes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
10 months ago
Five nodes won't cut it with two down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
11 months ago
Definitely need six nodes for full compliance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
11 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
11 months ago
I feel like I read that Hybrid clusters can handle some of these requirements, but I can't recall if they support full compliance with two nodes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to consider deduplication and compression. I think an All-Flash setup is better for performance, so maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the minimum number of hosts. I thought five nodes might work, but I think it could be risky with the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
12 months ago
I remember that for Erasure Coding, we typically need a minimum of six nodes to ensure compliance when two nodes are down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the minimum number of hosts requirement. Does that mean we need to go with the six-node cluster, or could the five-node still work if it meets the other requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. Erasure Coding, deduplication, and compression - that points to an All-Flash vSAN cluster. And we need to maintain full policy compliance with two nodes down, so that rules out the five-node options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
12 months ago
This looks like a tricky vSAN design question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and think through the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
12 months ago
I think the six-node All-Flash vSAN cluster is the way to go here. It gives us the redundancy we need while still meeting the other requirements like Erasure Coding and deduplication/compression. Seems like the safest and most robust option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know payroll tax is an expense, but I'm not sure if it shows up on the income statement or the balance sheet. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. Capital budgeting is all about evaluating the costs and benefits of major investments, right? So the adoption of a new cost allocation method doesn't really fit that criteria. I'm going to go with B on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
1 year ago
This question requires careful reading and application of the concepts. I'll take my time to analyze each statement before selecting the ones I believe are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 year ago
I bet the architect is sitting back, sipping their coffee, and watching us debate this like it's the most important decision of the century. Little do they know, we're all just trying to impress them with our vSAN expertise. *laughs*
upvoted 0 times
Murray
1 year ago
C) Six nodes Hybrid vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
1 year ago
B) Six nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
1 year ago
A) Five nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isadora
1 year ago
Ah, the classic vSAN design dilemma. Do we go for the All-Flash powerhouse or the Hybrid savings? Decisions, decisions. Wait, is there a 'Goldilocks' option that's 'just right'? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Alexia
1 year ago
C) Six nodes Hybrid vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
B) Six nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
1 year ago
A) Five nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marti
1 year ago
I'm going with the six-node Hybrid vSAN cluster. It provides the flexibility of a Hybrid setup while still delivering the needed storage features. Plus, six nodes sounds like a nice, even number, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. The five-node Hybrid vSAN cluster might be a more cost-effective option that still meets the requirements. It's worth considering if the customer is looking to save on hardware costs.
upvoted 0 times
Maile
1 year ago
I agree, the five-node Hybrid vSAN cluster seems like a practical choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 year ago
D) Five nodes Hybrid vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
1 year ago
Hmm, the five-node Hybrid vSAN cluster could be a good balance of cost-effectiveness and meeting the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 year ago
C) Six nodes Hybrid vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
1 year ago
B) Six nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
1 year ago
A) Five nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helga
1 year ago
The six-node All-Flash vSAN cluster seems like the way to go. It checks all the boxes - Erasure Coding, Deduplication, Compression, and maintains policy compliance even with two nodes down. Seems like the perfect fit.
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
1 year ago
D) Five nodes Hybrid vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
1 year ago
C) Six nodes Hybrid vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 year ago
B) Six nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 year ago
A) Five nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
B) Six nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
1 year ago
A) Five nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eileen
1 year ago
That's a good point, having an extra node for redundancy could be beneficial in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe a Six nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster would be more suitable to maintain full storage policy compliance when two nodes are down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
1 year ago
I think the customer's requirements can be met with a Five nodes All-Flash vSAN cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel