Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk Exam SPLK-2002 Topic 3 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 3
[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

Stakeholders have identified high availability for searchable data as their top priority. Which of the following best addresses this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Izetta at Feb 07, 2024, 07:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Luz
2 months ago
Increasing the replication factor? That's a no-brainer. It's like having a backup plan for your backup plan. Gotta love that redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
Lorriane
10 days ago
D) Agreed, can never have too much redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
11 days ago
C) It's all about having that failover in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
26 days ago
B) Absolutely, redundancy is key for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
2 months ago
A) Increasing the replication factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johanna
2 months ago
Indexers with more CPUs? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Definitely not the answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Carmen
1 months ago
C) Increasing the number of search heads in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
1 months ago
B) Increasing the replication factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
2 months ago
A) Increasing the search factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tashia
3 months ago
More search heads? Sounds like a lot of overhead. I'd go with option B, it's the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Tashia
1 months ago
Yeah, adding more search heads might be too much. Option B is a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
1 months ago
I agree, increasing the replication factor will definitely improve availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 months ago
Option D could also help improve performance with more CPUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 months ago
More search heads might be too much to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronica
1 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. It's simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
2 months ago
Increasing the replication factor would definitely improve availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
2 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ines
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think increasing the search factor might help with the performance. At least it sounds like it could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
3 months ago
Increasing the replication factor is the way to go! Redundancy is key for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
Rosina
2 months ago
Absolutely, redundancy is crucial for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
2 months ago
B) Increasing the replication factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominic
3 months ago
But wouldn't increasing the replication factor help ensure high availability of searchable data in case of node failures?
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe C) Increasing the number of search heads in the cluster would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
3 months ago
I think the best option is B) Increasing the replication factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel