Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-2002 Exam - Topic 2 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 2
[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

When using ingest-based licensing, what Splunk role requires the license manager to scale?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Tracie at Aug 07, 2024, 04:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Stanton
4 months ago
Yeah, search peers are the ones that handle the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
5 months ago
Wait, really? I thought all roles had some scaling needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
5 months ago
No roles require scaling, that's a myth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
5 months ago
I thought it was the search heads!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
5 months ago
It's definitely the search peers that need scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards search peers too, but I can’t recall the specifics. I hope I remember the right details during the exam!
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
6 months ago
I’m confused; I thought deployment clients didn’t really affect licensing. Could it really be none of the roles?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
6 months ago
I feel like I saw a question like this in practice, and it was about search peers needing more licenses as they scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
6 months ago
I think it might be the search heads, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about scaling related to them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I think the key is to focus on the "ingest-based licensing" part of the question. That might give me a clue as to which role is involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I thought the license manager only needed to scale for the search peers, not the search heads. I'll have to double-check the Splunk documentation on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is B. Search heads are the ones that need the license manager to scale, since they are the ones that are actually consuming the licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know that search heads and deployment clients are involved in licensing, but I'm not sure which one specifically requires the license manager to scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different Splunk roles and how they relate to the license manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
6 months ago
The key here is to focus on the question and identify the service that specifically helps view account activity. I think AWS CloudTrail is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
6 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Do we have to create the entire presentation, or just the "Structures" section? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
11 months ago
Ah, the license manager, the real-life equivalent of trying to fit 10 pounds of data into a 5-pound bag. No wonder it needs to scale up!
upvoted 0 times
Tarra
9 months ago
D) Deployment clients
upvoted 0 times
...
India
10 months ago
C) There are no roles that require the license manager to scale
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
10 months ago
B) Search heads
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
10 months ago
A) Search peers
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benton
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure the license manager is like that one friend who always wants to be the center of attention. So, it makes sense that B) Search heads would be the ones to give it the spotlight it craves.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
10 months ago
I agree, Search heads definitely play a key role in managing the licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
10 months ago
Yeah, Search heads are like the VIPs when it comes to ingest-based licensing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
10 months ago
Search heads are indeed the ones that require the license manager to scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jimmie
11 months ago
Hmm, let me think... Is the license manager like a diva that needs its own dressing room? If so, then B) Search heads must be the ones to scale it up. They're the stars of the show, after all.
upvoted 0 times
Elinore
11 months ago
So, no need for the license manager to be a diva, huh?
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
11 months ago
Yeah, they're like the main actors in this licensing drama.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
11 months ago
Search heads must be the ones to scale it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reynalda
1 year ago
I'm stumped on this one. I thought the license manager was just a magical box that handled everything, like a genie in a bottle. But I guess C) There are no roles that require the license manager to scale is just too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
Jesusa
11 months ago
B) Search heads
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
11 months ago
A) Search peers
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cathrine
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old question of scaling the license manager. As a seasoned Splunk user, I'd say B) Search heads is the way to go. They're the real MVPs when it comes to handling all that data, so they deserve the extra scaling love.
upvoted 0 times
Allene
10 months ago
Search peers do help with distributing search workloads, but when it comes to scaling the license manager, search heads are the key players.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
11 months ago
But what about search peers? Don't they play a role in scaling the license manager too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
12 months ago
I agree, they handle a lot of data and need to be able to scale efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
12 months ago
Search heads are definitely crucial for scaling the license manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curt
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) There are no roles that require the license manager to scale could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
1 year ago
I agree with Sheldon, Search heads make sense because they handle search requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) Search heads.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel