New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-1003 Exam - Topic 3 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1003 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 3
[All SPLK-1003 Questions]

An admin oversees an environment with a 1000 GBI day license. The configuration file

server.conf has strict pool quota=false set. The license is divided into the following three pools, and today's usage is shown on the right-hand column:

Pool License Size Today's usage

X 500 GB/day 100 GB

Y 350 GB/day 400 GB

Z 150 GB/day 300 GB

Given this, which pool(s) are issued warnings?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In Splunk Enterprise, when you configure the server.conf file with strict pool quota=false, it means that license pools are allowed to share the total available license quota rather than being restricted to their individually allocated quotas. However, this does not prevent pools from issuing warnings if they exceed their allocated limits.

Given the environment with a 1000 GB/day license split into three pools:

Pool X: 500 GB/day license, 100 GB used

Pool Y: 350 GB/day license, 400 GB used

Pool Z: 150 GB/day license, 300 GB used

Let's analyze the usage:

Pool X is allocated 500 GB/day but has only used 100 GB, well within its limit.

Pool Y is allocated 350 GB/day but has used 400 GB, which exceeds its limit by 50 GB.

Pool Z is allocated 150 GB/day but has used 300 GB, which exceeds its limit by 150 GB.

Even with strict pool quota=false, pools Y and Z have exceeded their individual allocated quotas and will issue warnings. Pool X has not exceeded its quota and thus will not issue any warnings. Therefore, the pools that are issued warnings are Y and Z.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mona
3 months ago
None of the pools should be issued warnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
3 months ago
Wait, how can Y and Z both be over? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
3 months ago
I think all pools are fine, actually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
4 months ago
Definitely Z too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
4 months ago
Pool Y is over its limit!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
4 months ago
I believe Pool Z is definitely over its limit, but I’m not certain about Pool Y. Maybe it’s just a warning for Z?
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the strict pool quota setting. Does that mean we only look at the total usage across all pools?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to check usage against limits. I feel like both Y and Z might be problematic here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
5 months ago
I think Pool Y is over its limit, but I'm not sure if it counts as a warning since Pool X is under.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
5 months ago
Okay, based on the information provided, I believe the correct answer is C. None of the pools should be issued a warning, as the total usage is within the 1000 GB/day license limit, even though individual pools have exceeded their allocated amounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. The question says the configuration file has "strict pool quota=false" set, but I'm not sure how that affects the warning criteria. I'll need to double-check the implications of that setting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The total license is 1000 GB/day, and the pools are X (500 GB/day), Y (350 GB/day), and Z (150 GB/day). If the usage is below the pool size, no warning should be issued, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the pool usage and license details to determine which pool(s) would trigger a warning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
5 months ago
Alright, I think I've got it. Since the total usage (100 + 400 + 300 = 800 GB) is below the 1000 GB license, no pool should be issued a warning. The "strict pool quota=false" setting means the pools can exceed their individual limits as long as the total is under the license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to look at the administrative distance values on the routes. Option B seems to be the answer, as it increases the AD on the R1-R2-R4 path, making the R1-R3-R4 path preferred.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
Okay, let me see... Analogous uses actual costs from past projects, Parametric is based on statistical models, Bottom-up is a detailed estimate, and Top-down is a high-level estimate. I'm pretty sure Analogous is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
2 years ago
Ooh, this one's tricky. I think the correct answer is D, Y and Z. Pool X's usage is within its limit, but Y and Z are over, so they'll get the warnings. I hope the exam grader has a good sense of humor!
upvoted 0 times
Leontine
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think the answer is D, Y and Z. Pool X might be within its limit, but both Y and Z are over theirs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that, I think the answer might be B, Z only. Pool Y is definitely over its limit, but Pool X seems to be within its limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
1 year ago
I agree, I also think the answer is D, Y and Z. Pool X seems to be fine, but Y and Z are definitely over their limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
2 years ago
It's definitely a tricky situation. Y and Z are the ones issued warnings, according to the configuration file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
2 years ago
I think the admin should keep a closer eye on pool Y and Z. They're the ones exceeding their limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
2 years ago
I agree, Y and Z are the ones in trouble. Pool X seems to be doing fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryll
2 years ago
Hmm, let's see. With a 1000 GB/day license and strict pool quota set to false, I'd say the warning would go to Y and Z since their usage exceeds their respective pool sizes. Easy peasy, just like my grandma's apple pie!
upvoted 0 times
Lou
2 years ago
Right, because their usage is over their allocated pool sizes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
2 years ago
So, it's Y and Z that are issued warnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
2 years ago
Yeah, that makes sense. Y used 400 GB out of 350 GB and Z used 300 GB out of 150 GB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
2 years ago
I think the warning would go to Y and Z since their usage exceeds their pool sizes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Markus
2 years ago
I believe pool Z is also issued a warning because it has exceeded its license size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
2 years ago
I agree with Dusti, because pool Y is over its license size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
2 years ago
I think pool Y and Z are issued warnings.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel