Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ServiceNow CIS-FSM Exam - Topic 7 Question 19 Discussion

How do you prevent a task which has been rejected by an agent from being dynamically assigned to the same agent in the next 24 hours?
B) Configure the rejected technician duration system property
A) Configure custom assignment rules
C) Configure unassignment constraints for dynamic scheduling
D) Configure agent task rejection preferences

ServiceNow CIS-FSM Exam - Topic 7 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-FSM exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 7
[All CIS-FSM Questions]

How do you prevent a task which has been rejected by an agent from being dynamically assigned to the same agent in the next 24 hours?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Fairy at Sep 13, 2024, 06:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-FSM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Daron
9 months ago
D? Nah, that won't really solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
10 months ago
C seems like the best option for dynamic scheduling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
10 months ago
Wait, can we really set a 24-hour rule? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
10 months ago
I think A could work too, but not as effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
10 months ago
B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
11 months ago
I vaguely recall discussing agent task rejection preferences, but I can't remember if that directly relates to the 24-hour rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because it mentions unassignment constraints, which seems relevant to preventing reassignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
11 months ago
I feel like we covered something similar in practice questions. Configuring custom assignment rules could be a way to handle this, but I’m not confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
11 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the right one. I remember something about setting a duration for rejected tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
11 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Based on the question, the "Configure custom assignment rules" option seems like the most straightforward solution to prevent the task from being assigned to the same agent within 24 hours. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I'm guessing the "Configure rejected technician duration system property" might be the way to go, as that seems to directly address the 24-hour requirement. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
11 months ago
Ah, I see. This is about preventing the same agent from getting a rejected task again in the next 24 hours. I think the "Configure unassignment constraints for dynamic scheduling" option sounds like it could be the right approach to solve this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know there are different ways to handle task assignments and rejections, but I'm not sure which option would be the best fit here. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward configuration question. I think the key is to look for options that directly address the requirement of preventing the task from being assigned to the same agent within 24 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 years ago
Is there an option to just send the task to the agent's spam folder? That way, they'll never see it coming!
upvoted 0 times
Mabelle
2 years ago
C) Configure unassignment constraints for dynamic scheduling
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
2 years ago
B) Configure the rejected technician duration system property
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
2 years ago
A) Configure custom assignment rules
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
2 years ago
If I choose Option D, can I also configure 'agent task rejection excuses'? I've got a few good ones up my sleeve.
upvoted 0 times
Matthew
2 years ago
C) Configure unassignment constraints for dynamic scheduling
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
2 years ago
B) Configure the rejected technician duration system property
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
2 years ago
A) Configure custom assignment rules
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dottie
2 years ago
Option A sounds good, but I can't help but wonder if it would be as effective as the other choices. Gotta go with my gut on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Toshia
2 years ago
I'm not sure about option D, it doesn't seem as practical as the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards option C, it seems like it could work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
2 years ago
I agree, option B seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
2 years ago
I think option B might be the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. I think the answer might be C) Configure unassignment constraints for dynamic scheduling to prevent reassignment to the same agent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
2 years ago
Option D seems like it would give the agents more control over the task assignments. That could be useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe Option B would be a good choice to prevent the same agent from getting the task again.
upvoted 0 times
Tarra
2 years ago
Let's make sure to set that up to avoid assigning the task to the same agent again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 years ago
I agree, configuring the rejected technician duration system property should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
2 years ago
I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louisa
2 years ago
I think Option C is the way to go. Unassignment constraints make the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
Lilli
2 years ago
I think Option D could be worth considering as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
2 years ago
I'm not sure about Option B, it might not be as effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
2 years ago
I think Option A could also work if set up correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 years ago
I agree, Option C seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tomas
2 years ago
I agree with Carry. By configuring custom assignment rules, we can prevent the task from being assigned to the same agent again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Configure custom assignment rules.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel