Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scrum PSM-II Exam - Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-II exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 2
[All PSM-II Questions]

Your organization always stresses the importance of on-time delivery and reliability. A manager has detected that your team's progress is too slow. They feel that your team's velocity needs to be 10% higher.

The organization expects you, as the Scrum Master, to make it happen. How do you respond?

(choose the best two answers)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lucina
1 month ago
E is great! It sets a challenge but keeps it in the team's hands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 month ago
I like A. Educating management can help long-term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
2 months ago
D is too dismissive. We should engage, not push them away.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
2 months ago
C feels right too. Management needs to understand our process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
2 months ago
I prefer B and E. Removing impediments is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
2 months ago
I think A and E are solid choices. We need to involve management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
2 months ago
Just a reminder, velocity can fluctuate based on many factors, not just team effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
2 months ago
Totally agree with option E! Gradual improvement is key, and it motivates the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
3 months ago
Wait, can we really expect a 10% increase just like that? Seems unrealistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
3 months ago
Seriously, if they want a 10% increase, they should be prepared to remove some major impediments. This isn't a simple fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the management wants a magic wand to instantly boost the team's velocity. Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
D is a cop-out. As the Scrum Master, I should be proactive in helping the team improve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
4 months ago
E is a clever approach. Challenging the team while letting them figure it out is a good way to improve velocity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
4 months ago
A and B are the best options. As the Scrum Master, I need to educate management and help remove organizational impediments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on accountability, and I think option D might be too dismissive of management's concerns. It feels risky to just redirect them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
4 months ago
I feel like option C could be a good choice since it emphasizes the role of the Scrum Team in forecasting, but I wonder if management would really understand that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
4 months ago
I think option B makes sense because addressing impediments is crucial for improving productivity, but I’m a bit confused about how to balance that with management's expectations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
5 months ago
This is a great opportunity to educate management and get them involved in the process. I'll go with Approach A and B - that way, we can work together to find a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. I'll focus on removing impediments and challenging the team to improve, while making sure management understands their role. Approach B and E are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
5 months ago
I'm feeling a bit confused here. On one hand, I want to be transparent with management, but on the other, I don't want to overstep my role as Scrum Master. I'll need to review the Scrum principles again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
5 months ago
I remember discussing how important it is for the Scrum Master to facilitate communication between the team and management, but I'm not sure which option best reflects that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
5 months ago
Nah, I feel like option A is better. Management should be involved in the process!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
5 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. We need management's support to clear roadblocks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
6 months ago
C is also a good answer. Velocity is for forecasting, not predicting future productivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
6 months ago
Hmm, I think the key is to strike a balance between involving management and empowering the team. Approach B and E seem like the best options to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
6 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I should educate management or just let them know it's not my responsibility. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Lashanda
15 days ago
Balancing education and accountability is tricky. We need a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
20 days ago
True, but we also need to show them it takes time to improve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
26 days ago
I like the idea of enlisting their help to remove impediments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
1 month ago
But what if they don’t get it? We might just frustrate them more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
6 months ago
I think educating management is key. They need to understand our process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel