New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scrum PSM-II Exam - Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-II exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 2
[All PSM-II Questions]

Your organization always stresses the importance of on-time delivery and reliability. A manager has detected that your team's progress is too slow. They feel that your team's velocity needs to be 10% higher.

The organization expects you, as the Scrum Master, to make it happen. How do you respond?

(choose the best two answers)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

B) You inform management of organizational impediments that prevent the Scrum Team from being more productive. You enlist their help to remove these impediments.

This is a good answer because it is consistent with the Scrum Master's accountability to serve the Scrum Team and the organization by identifying and addressing the factors that hinder the team's effectiveness12. By informing management of the organizational impediments, you can leverage their authority and influence to resolve them. By enlisting their help, you can also foster a collaborative and supportive relationship with them. C. You explain how a Scrum Team uses the velocity of a Sprint primarily to forecast work for the next Sprint, not to perfectly predict future productivity. You refer management to the Product Owner for all information concerning the progress of development.

This is another good answer because it is consistent with the Scrum Master's accountability to educate and coach the organization on the Scrum framework and its principles12. By explaining how velocity is used in Scrum, you can help management understand that it is not a reliable metric for measuring performance or comparing teams.By referring management to the Product Owner, you can also respect the Product Owner's accountability to manage the product backlog and communicate the value and status of the product34.


by Catherin at Nov 22, 2025, 02:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSM-II Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bobbye
10 hours ago
Wait, can we really expect a 10% increase just like that? Seems unrealistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
6 days ago
Seriously, if they want a 10% increase, they should be prepared to remove some major impediments. This isn't a simple fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
11 days ago
Haha, I bet the management wants a magic wand to instantly boost the team's velocity. Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
16 days ago
D is a cop-out. As the Scrum Master, I should be proactive in helping the team improve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
21 days ago
E is a clever approach. Challenging the team while letting them figure it out is a good way to improve velocity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
26 days ago
A and B are the best options. As the Scrum Master, I need to educate management and help remove organizational impediments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
1 month ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on accountability, and I think option D might be too dismissive of management's concerns. It feels risky to just redirect them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
1 month ago
I feel like option C could be a good choice since it emphasizes the role of the Scrum Team in forecasting, but I wonder if management would really understand that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
1 month ago
I think option B makes sense because addressing impediments is crucial for improving productivity, but I’m a bit confused about how to balance that with management's expectations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
2 months ago
This is a great opportunity to educate management and get them involved in the process. I'll go with Approach A and B - that way, we can work together to find a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
2 months ago
Okay, I've got this. I'll focus on removing impediments and challenging the team to improve, while making sure management understands their role. Approach B and E are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 months ago
I'm feeling a bit confused here. On one hand, I want to be transparent with management, but on the other, I don't want to overstep my role as Scrum Master. I'll need to review the Scrum principles again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 months ago
I remember discussing how important it is for the Scrum Master to facilitate communication between the team and management, but I'm not sure which option best reflects that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
2 months ago
Nah, I feel like option A is better. Management should be involved in the process!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
2 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. We need management's support to clear roadblocks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
3 months ago
C is also a good answer. Velocity is for forecasting, not predicting future productivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
3 months ago
Hmm, I think the key is to strike a balance between involving management and empowering the team. Approach B and E seem like the best options to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
3 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I should educate management or just let them know it's not my responsibility. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
3 months ago
I think educating management is key. They need to understand our process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel