MENU
Which two ways of creating Scrum Teams are consistent with Scrum's values?
(choose the best two answers)
Suggested Answer: A, C
Get Premium PSM-I Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The best two answers are A and C. These two ways of creating Scrum Teams are consistent with Scrum's values because they respect the self-organization and empowerment of the people who will be working in the teams. They also foster openness and courage by allowing the people to express their preferences and opinions about the new structure.
B, D and E are not consistent with Scrum's values because they impose a top-down approach that does not involve the people who will be affected by the change. They also undermine the commitment and focus of the teams by assigning them to work on something they may not be interested in or passionate about.
41 comments · newest first
TA
Tamekia
10 months ago
I'm not sure about A, can teams really self-organize effectively?
KI
Kimbery
11 months ago
Wait, E? That doesn't sound right at all!
WA
Wade
11 months ago
B and D seem too top-down for Scrum.
HO
Hollis
11 months ago
Totally agree, A and C align with Scrum values.
TI
Tiera
11 months ago
A and C are the way to go!
OR
Oren
12 months ago
I have a hunch that A and C are the best answers, but I’m a bit uncertain about C.
RA
Raina
12 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think B and D are definitely not consistent with Scrum principles.
RU
Ruthann
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like C might also align with Scrum values since it involves team input.
GE
Georgeanna
1 year ago
I remember that Scrum emphasizes self-organization, so I think A could be a good choice.
NI
Nicholle
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A and C as the most Scrum-aligned options. Letting the teams organize themselves and having existing teams propose the new structure seems to fit the Scrum principles of empowerment and self-management.
AR
Armanda
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. I know Scrum values things like cross-functionality and autonomy, so I'm guessing the options that involve more self-organization and collaboration would be the best choices.
AL
Alishia
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different approaches to team formation, but I'll need to think carefully about which ones are consistent with Scrum.
LE
Lenna
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the key is to identify the options that align with Scrum's values like self-organization and empowerment.
DA
Danilo
1 year ago
I'm a bit torn between A and D. Managers collaborating to assign individuals could work, but I'm not sure if that fully aligns with the Scrum value of self-organization. I'll need to re-read the options carefully.
ED
Edda
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. I need to calculate the Rolled Throughput Yield using the given data.
PE
Pearlene
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. There are a lot of moving parts to consider when implementing an ACD system. I'm not entirely sure which option best captures the common issues, but I'll need to think through each one carefully and try to identify the most comprehensive answer.
CH
Chana
2 years ago
Option E is a joke, right? The Chief Product Owner dictating the team structures? That's about as un-Scrum-like as it gets!
MA
Marge
2 years ago
Option E is definitely not consistent with Scrum's values.
LE
Lettie
2 years ago
C) Existing teams propose how they would like to go about organizing into the new structure.
LE
Letha
2 years ago
A) Bring all the people together and let them organize into Scrum Teams
VE
Veronika
2 years ago
I'm going with A and C. Anything involving managers personally reassigning people or determining the new teams is just wrong for Scrum.
CL
Clemencia
2 years ago
D? Really? Managers assigning individuals to teams? That's the complete opposite of Scrum's principles. Definitely not the correct answer here.
NI
Nickolas
2 years ago
A and C seem like the best options. Letting the teams self-organize is key to Scrum's values of empowerment and collaboration.
SH
Shawn
2 years ago
Absolutely, letting the teams organize themselves promotes autonomy and teamwork.
MI
Mila
2 years ago
I agree, A and C are definitely in line with Scrum's values.
DI
Dierdre
2 years ago
Yes, I agree. Self-organization and collaboration are important in Scrum.
JE
Jesse
2 years ago
C) Existing teams propose how they would like to go about organizing into the new structure.
GO
Goldie
2 years ago
A) Bring all the people together and let them organize into Scrum Teams
AL
Alpha
2 years ago
Absolutely, self-organization is a core principle of Scrum. It helps foster a sense of ownership and accountability within the team.
SA
Salome
2 years ago
I agree, A and C are definitely the best options. It's important for the teams to have a say in how they are organized.
WI
Willard
2 years ago
Absolutely, self-organization and collaboration are essential in Scrum.
DO
Dortha
2 years ago
I agree, A and C are definitely the best options for creating Scrum Teams.
OR
Oretha
2 years ago
Option C is clearly the way to go. Scrum teams should have autonomy to organize themselves, not be dictated to by management.
FE
Fernanda
2 years ago
B) Managers personally re-assign current subordinates to new teams.
MA
Malcolm
2 years ago
That goes against the idea of self-organization.
IN
In
2 years ago
D) Managers collaborate to assign individuals to specific teams.
CA
Caprice
2 years ago
C) Existing teams propose how they would like to go about organizing into the new structure.
LA
Lai
2 years ago
Agreed, autonomy is key for Scrum teams.
TE
Teri
2 years ago
A) Bring all the people together and let them organize into Scrum Teams
BU
Bulah
2 years ago
C) Existing teams propose how they would like to go about organizing into the new structure.
LO
Louisa
2 years ago
A) Bring all the people together and let them organize into Scrum Teams