Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 2
[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

A banking company uses a VIP Flag in the Contact Object that they want only Private Banking Reps to see.

Which approach is recommended to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Laurel at Dec 08, 2024, 03:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marti
2 months ago
The bank's IT team must be really paranoid about that VIP Flag. It's like they're guarding the nuclear launch codes or something.
upvoted 0 times
Ryan
14 days ago
A: I agree, it's important to limit access to sensitive information like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
23 days ago
B: Yeah, setting Field Level Security for the VIP Flag field makes sense to control who can see it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
1 months ago
A: Option C seems like the best approach to restrict access to the VIP Flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Freida
2 months ago
Option A looks a bit overkill. Why go through the trouble of creating a new record type when you can just use Field Level Security?
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
2 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine the Private Banking Reps trying to sneak a peek at the VIP Flag like it's some kind of secret spy code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
2 months ago
I'm not sure if Option B is the best approach. Hiding the field from other layouts could cause confusion or unintended behavior.
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
9 days ago
B: I agree, Option B might lead to confusion. Setting Field Level Security for the VIP Flag field is a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
13 days ago
A: I think Option A is the way to go. Changing the field type and creating a new record type seems like a more secure approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mabelle
2 months ago
Option C seems like the most straightforward way to achieve the requirement. Field Level Security is designed for exactly this kind of use case.
upvoted 0 times
Maryln
2 months ago
I agree, Field Level Security is the best option for controlling visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
2 months ago
Option C seems like the most straightforward way to achieve the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alton
2 months ago
I prefer option C, setting Field Level Security for the VIP Flag field seems more straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
2 months ago
I agree with Torie, changing the field type to a picklist and defining a new record type makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
2 months ago
I think option A is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel