Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Communications Cloud Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Communications Cloud exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Communications Cloud Questions]

During the discovery phase a consultant learns that provisioning the internet service requires multiple steps of integration. The first step returns as identifier that is required for the second steps, but is meaningless in ensuring steps afterwards. How should the consultant implement this requirement in Order Management with the least amount of configurations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

by Niesha at Jun 01, 2024, 10:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Communications Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ma
4 days ago
This is like a game of 'pass the identifier' - who will win the integration challenge?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
6 days ago
I guess you could say the consultant is 'provisioning' their troubleshooting skills for this question. Ba dum tss!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
14 days ago
A sounds like it could work, but I'm not sure if modeling a non-assetizable attribute is the best way to handle this. Doesn't that seem a bit hacky?
upvoted 0 times
Precious
1 days ago
User 3: C) Implement the integration using an integration procedure, which can make both callouts, and pass identifier as a variable from one step to another
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
4 days ago
User 2: B) Create a Callout that uses a customer adaptor. This adaptor is implemented in Apex and can make both callouts and keep the identifier in memory in between callouts
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
7 days ago
User 1: A sounds like it could work, but I'm not sure if modeling a non-assetizable attribute is the best way to handle this. Doesn't that seem a bit hacky?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tarra
29 days ago
D seems like a good option, but I'm not sure if we really need to involve the Enterprise Service Bus just for this. Wouldn't that be overkill?
upvoted 0 times
Gennie
17 days ago
A) Model a non- assetizable attribute on the technical product to hold the identifiers configure both orchestration items for provisioning on the same swimlane
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lucille
1 months ago
Option B sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if keeping the identifier in memory between callouts is the best approach. Wouldn't that make the solution more complex and less maintainable?
upvoted 0 times
Wai
11 days ago
User 2: I agree, that seems like a simpler and more straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
14 days ago
User 1: I think option A is the best choice. Model a non-assetizable attribute on the technical product to hold the identifiers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katie
1 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option C could also work well by passing the identifier as a variable between steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
1 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Implementing the integration using an integration procedure seems like the most straightforward way to handle the multiple steps and pass the identifier between them.
upvoted 0 times
Louann
8 days ago
D) Implement the multiple call logic in Enterprise service Bus and have a single callout to the ESB in orchestration
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
12 days ago
C) Implement the integration using an integration procedure, which can make both callouts, and pass identifier as a variable from one step to another
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
19 days ago
B) Create a Callout that uses a customer adaptor. This adaptor is implemented in Apex and can make both callouts and keep the identifier in memory in between callouts
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
25 days ago
A) Model a non-assetizable attribute on the technical product to hold the identifiers configure both orchestration items for provisioning on the same swimlane
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aileen
1 months ago
I agree with Ilda, modeling a non-assetizable attribute seems like the most efficient way to handle the identifiers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
2 months ago
I think option A sounds like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
a