Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Exam - Topic 8 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) exam

Question #: 82
Topic #: 8

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions]

When the sales team views an individual customer record, they need to see recent interactions for the customer. These interactions can be sales orders, phone calls, or Cases. The date range for recent interactions will be different for every customer record type.

How can this be accomplished?

AUse batch Apex to query for the most recent interactions when the customer view screen is loaded.

BUse Lightning Flow to read the customer's record type, and then do a dynamic query for recent interactions and display on the View page.

CUse a Lightning component to query and display interactions based on record type that is passed in using a design:attribute from the Lightning page.

DUse a dynamic form on the customer record page to display recent interactions.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

The correct way to fix this is to add Test.startTest() before and add Test.stopTest() after Line 18 of the code. This will reset the governor limits for the code that executes between these two methods, and allow the test to run without hitting the SOQL query limit.The Test.startTest() and Test.stopTest() methods are used to test code that makes a lot of queries or calls asynchronous methods12. By using these methods, the developer can isolate the code that needs more resources and verify that it does not exceed the governor limits.

Using Limits, startTest, and stopTest | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers

Test.StartTest & Test.StopTest - Salesforce Developer Community

Why would a developer use test startTest and test stopTest in Salesforce? | ForceTalks

by Arminda at Dec 23, 2023, 04:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Terrilyn

5 months ago

I like D for its simplicity, but not sure if it’s enough.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

5 months ago

Wait, can dynamic forms really handle all that? Sounds tricky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lanie

5 months ago

C could work too, especially with custom components.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mee

6 months ago

I disagree, A is more efficient for loading data quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

6 months ago

Option B seems like the best choice for dynamic queries.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicitas

6 months ago

Dynamic forms seem like a newer feature, but I can't recall if they can handle this specific requirement effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrie

6 months ago

I feel like batch Apex might be overkill for this. We usually want real-time data, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

6 months ago

I think option C sounds familiar; using a Lightning component could be a flexible way to handle different record types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daryl

6 months ago

I remember we discussed using Lightning Flow for similar scenarios, but I'm not sure if it's the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

German

6 months ago

I'm leaning towards option A with batch Apex. That way we can handle the querying and processing in the background without impacting the user experience. The only concern I have is making sure the batch job runs efficiently and doesn't cause any performance issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

6 months ago

Option B with Lightning Flow seems like a good way to handle this. I like the idea of using the record type to drive the dynamic query. That should give us the flexibility we need to handle the different date ranges for each interaction type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'm not super familiar with Lightning components and design attributes, so I'd have to do some research on that approach. The other options seem a bit more straightforward, but I'll need to think it through more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selene

7 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I'd probably go with option C - using a Lightning component to query and display the interactions based on the record type passed in from the page.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

7 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is C, execute the 'expert' command in the cli.sh shell. That sounds like the right way to switch to the advanced shell.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I fully grasp the differences between them. I'll need to review my notes on the P3O model in more detail.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

7 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if monitoring for unauthorized access or using a web-content filter would be the best approach against social engineering attacks. I think the key is to limit the information we share publicly, so I'm leaning towards option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

7 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward question about Cisco Unified Contact Center Express. I think I've seen this topic come up before in the study materials, so I should be able to handle this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rupert

11 months ago

Batch Apex? Seriously? That's like trying to solve a paperclip shortage with a nuclear warhead. I'm definitely going with C on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Boris

9 months ago

I think C is the way to go for displaying recent interactions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

9 months ago

It would definitely make the customer view screen more user-friendly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laticia

10 months ago

Yeah, C seems like the best option to display recent interactions based on record type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chau

10 months ago

Using a Lightning component with a design attribute sounds like a more efficient solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annita

10 months ago

Using a Lightning component with a design attribute sounds like a more efficient solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

10 months ago

I agree, Batch Apex seems like overkill for this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

10 months ago

I agree, Batch Apex seems like overkill for this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonna

12 months ago

Dynamic forms, huh? That could work, but it feels a bit clunky. I think I'll go with C - the Lightning component idea seems the most streamlined to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

12 months ago

Ooh, I like the sound of that dynamic query in the Lightning Flow! Seems like a great way to keep things flexible for different record types. I'm going to have to go with B on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Buck

10 months ago

User 3: I think Lightning Flow is the way to go for this scenario. It offers flexibility and efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

10 months ago

User 2: Definitely, it would make it easier to display recent interactions based on different record types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

11 months ago

User 1: I agree, using Lightning Flow for dynamic queries sounds like a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

1 year ago

I personally prefer option A. Using batch Apex to query for recent interactions seems like a reliable solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maia

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure batch Apex is the way to go here. Wouldn't that just slow down the customer view page load? I'm leaning towards C - using a Lightning component seems like the most elegant solution.

upvoted 0 times