New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Exam - Topic 4 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions]

Recently, users notice that fields that were recently added for one department suddenly disappear without warning.

Which two statements are true regarding these issues and resolution?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Lezlie at Jan 11, 2025, 02:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Laticia
3 months ago
I heard it's because of overlapping Change Sets messing things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
3 months ago
Totally agree, it's all about managing Change Sets properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
3 months ago
Wait, fields can just disappear like that? Sounds sketchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
4 months ago
I disagree, Page Layouts can be deployed safely if done right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
4 months ago
A sandbox is definitely a must for testing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
4 months ago
I feel like creating a sandbox is a good practice, but I’m not convinced it directly relates to the fields disappearing. Maybe option A is less relevant?
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where multiple admins were involved, and it seems like option D could be a possibility too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think if admins are deploying Change Sets over each other, that could definitely cause issues like in option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
5 months ago
I remember something about how Change Sets can mess with Field-Level Security, so maybe option B is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key is to understand how Change Sets and Page Layouts can interact, and how that might lead to fields being unintentionally removed. I'll carefully consider the options and select the two that best address the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
5 months ago
I've seen this type of issue before. My strategy would be to focus on the deployment process and how that might be causing the fields to disappear. The sandbox idea and the potential for overlapping Change Sets both seem plausible to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm a bit confused about the relationship between Page Layouts, Field-Level Security, and Change Sets. I'll need to think through the potential scenarios and try to eliminate the less likely options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the root cause, which could be related to how the Change Sets are being deployed. I'll need to carefully consider the options and choose the two most likely true statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key points before answering. The issue is that fields are disappearing after being added, so I'll need to focus on deployment best practices and potential causes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
10 months ago
I'm just imagining these admins frantically trying to deploy their changes, like a bunch of kids fighting over the same toy. Sandbox is the way to go, but they really need to get their act together!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
10 months ago
Oh man, these admins are really stepping on each other's toes, aren't they? It's like a game of Tetris, but instead of blocks, it's fields disappearing left and right!
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
9 months ago
C) The administrators are deploying their own Change Sets over each other, thus replacing entire Page Layouts in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
9 months ago
A) A sandbox should be created to use as a unified testing environment instead of deploying Change Sets directly to production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
10 months ago
Yep, C and D are the way to go. Page Layouts should never be deployed via Change Sets, that's a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Dorothea
9 months ago
D) The administrators are deploying their own Change Sets, thus deleting each other's fields from the objects in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
10 months ago
C) The administrators are deploying their own Change Sets over each other, thus replacing entire Page Layouts in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queenie
10 months ago
A sandbox is definitely a good idea, but the issue here seems to be with how the Change Sets are being deployed. I think options C and D are spot on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
10 months ago
I believe option C is also true. Admins deploying Change Sets over each other can lead to fields disappearing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
11 months ago
I agree with Nakita. Deploying Change Sets directly to production can cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
11 months ago
I think option A is true because using a sandbox for testing is safer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel