Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Exam - Topic 2 Question 121 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) exam

Question #: 121
Topic #: 2

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions]

A developer created a Lightning web component mat allows users to Input a text value that is used to search for Accounts by calling an Apex method. The Apex method returns a list of account to apply and is called imperatively from a JavaScript event handler.

Which two changes should the developer make so the Apex method functions correctly.

Choose 2 answers

AAdd @AuraEnabled to line 09.

BAdd @AuraEnabled to line 03.

CAdd @AuraEnabled to lines 11 and 12.

DAdd @AuraEnabled to line 01.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

by Carla at Nov 20, 2025, 07:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Brigette

3 days ago

Agreed, line 01 makes the most sense for accessibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

8 days ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I'm going with B and C, just to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

13 days ago

Haha, I bet the developer was scratching their head on this one. B and C are the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

18 days ago

Hmm, I was thinking D, but B and C make more sense. Apex can be tricky sometimes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbie

24 days ago

I agree, B and C are the way to go. Gotta love that Apex method!

upvoted 0 times

...

Delila

29 days ago

B and C are the correct answers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawrence

1 month ago

I think we need to add @AuraEnabled to the method itself and possibly the parameters. I remember something about making sure the method is accessible from the LWC.

upvoted 0 times

...

Claudia

1 month ago

I’m a bit confused about which lines need the annotation. I thought it was only necessary for the method, but maybe it also applies to the return type?

upvoted 0 times

...

Maxima

1 month ago

This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to enable an Apex method for LWC. I think it might be line 03 since that's where the method signature is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

2 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of the @AuraEnabled annotation for Apex methods, but I'm not sure if it should be on the method itself or just the parameters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dortha

2 months ago

This seems straightforward. The Apex method is being called from the Lightning web component, so it needs to be marked as @AuraEnabled. I'd go with option B or C to make the necessary changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kyoko

2 months ago

I'm a bit confused here. The question mentions the component, but the code snippet doesn't show the component. I'll need to make sure I understand the full context before deciding on the changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

2 months ago

Wait, why would you add it to line 03? That seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

3 months ago

I think line 09 is the right place for @AuraEnabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

3 months ago

Definitely need @AuraEnabled on line 01.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerilyn

3 months ago

I think the key is to identify which part of the Apex code needs to be marked as @AuraEnabled. Based on the options, it seems like either the method itself or the parameters/return type need to be annotated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myra

3 months ago

Okay, let's see. The question mentions the Apex method being called imperatively, so I'm guessing the issue is with the method not being marked as @AuraEnabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

3 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the code to identify the issue and the appropriate changes.

upvoted 0 times

Carissa

2 months ago

I think adding @AuraEnabled to line 01 is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...