Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Exam - Topic 11 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 11
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions]

A developer wants to write a generic Apex method that will compare the Salesforce Name filed between any two object records, for example to compare the Name field of an Account and an Opportunity; or the name of an Account and a Contact.

How should the developer do this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Chauncey at May 06, 2022, 04:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lawrence
5 months ago
I think C is the best choice, it’s clean and efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
6 months ago
Wait, can you really use Schema.describe() for this? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
6 months ago
A is way too complicated for a simple comparison!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
6 months ago
I disagree, D could be more reliable for metadata comparisons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
6 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward for comparing Name fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
6 months ago
Option D seems like overkill for this task. I don't think we need to use the metadata API just to compare names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
6 months ago
I feel like option A is not the best choice. Using String.replace() seems too complicated for just comparing two Name fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about using Schema.describe() in a similar question. It might be relevant here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
7 months ago
I think option C sounds right because casting to sObject and using get() seems like a straightforward way to access the Name field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
7 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the code and think about what the `transform()` and `bind1st()` functions are doing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know there are different backup options, but I'm not sure which one uses the command line specifically. I'll have to review my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a lot of options, and I want to make sure I choose the right ones that are truly relevant to the CSFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to find a way to centralize and reuse the redundant logic, while still preserving the independence of the individual service candidates. I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
7 months ago
I feel like AWS IAM roles could be relevant here too, but I'm leaning towards option C because of the identity provider aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel