New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 7 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 7
[All Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect (Mule-Arch-201) Questions]

The asset version 2.0.0 of the Order API is successfully published in Exchange and configured in API Manager with the Autodiscovery API ID correctly linked to the

API implementation, A new GET method is added to the existing API specification, and after updates, the asset version of the Order API is 2.0.1,

What happens to the Autodiscovery API ID when the new asset version is updated in API Manager?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Understanding API Autodiscovery in MuleSoft:

API Autodiscovery links an API implementation in Anypoint Platform with its configuration in API Manager. This is controlled by the API ID which is set in the API Autodiscovery element in the Mule application.

The API ID remains consistent across minor updates to the API asset version in Exchange (e.g., from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1) as long as it is the same API.

Effect of Asset Version Update on API Autodiscovery:

When the asset version is updated (e.g., from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1), the API ID remains the same. Therefore, no changes are needed in the Autodiscovery configuration within the Mule application. The Autodiscovery will continue to link the API implementation to the latest version in API Manager.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A: Incorrect, as the API ID does not automatically change with minor asset version updates.

Option B: Incorrect, as the API ID remains the same, so no update is needed in the API implementation.

Option C (Correct Answer): The API ID does not change, so no changes are necessary in the API implementation for the new asset version.

Option D: Incorrect, as there is no need to update the API implementation in the Autodiscovery global element for minor version changes.

Conclusion:

Option C is the correct answer, as the API ID remains unchanged with minor version updates, and no changes are needed in the API Autodiscovery configuration.

Refer to MuleSoft documentation on API Autodiscovery and version management for more details.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mitsue
3 days ago
Wait, does the Autodiscovery API ID really stay the same? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
8 days ago
I think it does change, so option B sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
13 days ago
The API ID doesn't change with new versions, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
18 days ago
Wait, there's an Autodiscovery element? I thought we just used the API Manager console. This exam is getting too technical!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
24 days ago
D makes the most sense. The ID doesn't change, but the version needs to be updated in the implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
29 days ago
Haha, I bet the developers forgot to update the Autodiscovery element. Classic mistake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
1 month ago
C seems like the correct answer to me. The API ID doesn't change, so no updates are needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
1 month ago
I think the answer is B. The API ID changes, so the implementation must be updated with the latest ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 month ago
I'm confused about the differences between the options. I thought the API ID would change with a new version, but now I'm not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
I feel like I saw a similar question in practice, and it mentioned that the API ID doesn't change, so could it be option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
2 months ago
I remember something about needing to update the API implementation when the version changes, which makes me lean towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
Okay, so I'm thinking option C is the right answer here. The question says the API ID is correctly linked to the implementation, and that it doesn't change even though the asset version is updated to 2.0.1. So no changes should be needed to the implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
2 months ago
I think the Autodiscovery API ID remains the same when a new version is published, so maybe it's option C? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
3 months ago
I think the API ID changes with the new version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. The question states that a new GET method is added, so that suggests the API ID must have changed to reflect the new version. In that case, the API implementation would need to be updated with the latest API ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
3 months ago
Hmm, I think the key here is whether the API ID changes or not. If it doesn't change, then I'm guessing the API implementation doesn't need to be updated. But if the API ID does change, then we'd need to update the implementation to use the new ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between the API ID and the asset version. Do I need to update the API implementation if the asset version changes but the API ID stays the same?
upvoted 0 times
Kristeen
2 months ago
Yeah, if the asset version changes but the ID doesn't, no update needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
3 months ago
I think the API ID stays the same, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel