Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Manufacturing Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-213) Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

A consultant is implementing Manufacturing Cloud. After the consultant concludes the discovery phase, the customer identifies additional must-have features for the platform.Which recommendation should the consultant make regarding these additional features?
B) Create a change request and arbitrate based on other features.
A) Add the feature in the project scope.
C) Remove another feature from the list of requirements to account for the additional workload.

Salesforce Manufacturing Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-213) Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Manufacturing Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-213) exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 1
[All Manufacturing Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-213) Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tonette
6 months ago
Change requests help manage scope creep effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
6 months ago
Totally agree with B, prioritizing is essential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
7 months ago
Wait, can we really just remove features like that? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
7 months ago
I think A is better, just add it to the scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
7 months ago
Definitely go with option B, change requests are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannie
7 months ago
I recall that change requests are common in projects. So, option B sounds familiar, but I’m not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
8 months ago
I feel like adding features directly to the scope could lead to issues later. Maybe option A isn't the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question where we had to prioritize features. Could it be option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
8 months ago
I think we discussed something about managing scope changes in our last study group. Maybe option B is the right approach?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
8 months ago
Based on my experience, the best move would be to negotiate with the customer and see if we can prioritize the must-have features within the current project plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on how to handle this. Should we just add the new features or try to rework the existing scope?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
8 months ago
Okay, I think I know the right approach here. I'd recommend creating a change request to formally document the additional requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully weigh the options and consider the impact on the project timeline and budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
8 months ago
This is a common challenge in consulting. I'd suggest carefully reviewing the change request process and working closely with the customer to find the most pragmatic solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
8 months ago
Wait, I'm confused. Doesn't the Axis pixel counter have something to do with video file sizes? I'm leaning towards option C, but I'm not totally confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
B) Create a change request and arbitrate based on other features. Sounds like the consultant needs to play a game of features Tetris to make this work.
upvoted 0 times
Sanjuana
12 months ago
User 3: Remove another feature from the list of requirements to account for the additional workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
1 year ago
User 2: Create a change request and arbitrate based on other features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
User 1: Add the feature in the project scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lourdes
1 year ago
A) Add the feature in the project scope. Easy peasy, just squeeze it in! What could possibly go wrong, right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Marion
12 months ago
A) Sounds like a plan! Let's make it work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
1 year ago
B) Create a change request and arbitrate based on other features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
1 year ago
A) Add the feature in the project scope. Easy peasy, just squeeze it in! What could possibly go wrong, right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renea
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards C) Remove another feature to account for the additional workload. This way, the project scope remains manageable and the timeline doesn't get derailed.
upvoted 0 times
Mendy
1 year ago
C) Remove another feature from the list of requirements to account for the additional workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
1 year ago
B) Create a change request and arbitrate based on other features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
1 year ago
A) Add the feature in the project scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
1 year ago
B) Create a change request and arbitrate based on other features. This is the most prudent approach to handle the additional requirements, as it involves proper change management and prioritization.
upvoted 0 times
Brunilda
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, we need to prioritize and make sure it aligns with the project scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
1 year ago
User 1: We should create a change request for the additional features.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelia
1 year ago
We can create a change request and prioritize based on other features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
1 year ago
But what if it affects the timeline and budget?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
1 year ago
I think we should add the feature in the project scope.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel