Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Manufacturing Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-213) Exam - Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

An administrator has updated the team member hierarchy type from Forecasts hierarchy to Manager hierarchy on the account manager target.What will happen to existing targets?
C) Status for all existing targets will become Draft.
A) All access to existing targets will be deleted.
B) Status for all existing targets will become Read-only.

Salesforce Manufacturing Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-213) Exam - Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Manufacturing Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-213) exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 1
[All Manufacturing Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-213) Questions]

An administrator has updated the team member hierarchy type from Forecasts hierarchy to Manager hierarchy on the account manager target.

What will happen to existing targets?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When you change the team member hierarchy type for account manager targets, the status of all existing targets becomes Draft. This means that the targets are no longer active and need to be redistributed by the account managers according to the new hierarchy. The previous assignments and target values are not deleted, but they are not visible in the account manager targets list views or reports. You can still view them in the related lists of the account manager targets records.Reference:Choose Team Member Hierarchy for Account Manager Targets


by Adria at Apr 26, 2024, 08:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Manufacturing Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-213) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Eliz
6 months ago
I’m not sure about this, sounds a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
6 months ago
Definitely read-only, that makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
7 months ago
Wait, are you serious? I thought they’d go to draft status!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
7 months ago
Nah, I believe they'll just be read-only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
7 months ago
I think all access will be deleted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
7 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think the targets might become draft. But I’m not 100% confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
8 months ago
I recall that changing the hierarchy could affect the status of targets, but I can't remember if they go to draft or read-only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like all access to existing targets could be deleted. That sounds familiar from the study materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
8 months ago
I think when the hierarchy type changes, existing targets might become read-only. I remember something similar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
8 months ago
I've got a good handle on this. The hierarchy type change means the existing targets will become read-only, so option B is the correct answer. I'm confident in this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. If the hierarchy type is changed from Forecasts to Manager, that could potentially impact the visibility and access to the existing targets. I'm leaning towards option B, but I'll double-check my understanding before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to really focus on the details of the question and the potential impacts of changing the hierarchy type. I don't want to rush into an answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one, but I think the key is to understand how the hierarchy type change affects the existing targets. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
8 months ago
The stakeholder register is probably the odd one out here. Qualitative risk analysis is more focused on the risks themselves and the project plan, rather than the stakeholders. I'll go with that as my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The role names seem a bit cryptic. I'll make an educated guess, but I may need to come back to this question if I have time at the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I remember learning about intercompany eliminations, but the details are a bit fuzzy. I think I need to review my notes on consolidation rules and how they impact intercompany account balances. I'll make sure to read the question carefully and consider each option before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking for just the file names, no extra info. So it's gotta be option A, "ls -a". That shows all the files, including hidden ones, without any extra details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
2 years ago
I'm going with B. Read-only seems like the safest bet when updating the hierarchy type.
upvoted 0 times
Deja
2 years ago
I think C might also be a possibility, but B is probably the most likely outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 years ago
I agree, B does seem like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
2 years ago
Yeah, it's tough. The question's phrasing is a bit confusing. I might go with Read-only, it seems like a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 years ago
Haha, this question reminds me of that time I accidentally deleted my entire sales pipeline. Good times, good times.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
2 years ago
C) Status for all existing targets will become Draft.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
2 years ago
B) Status for all existing targets will become Read-only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
2 years ago
A) All access to existing targets will be deleted.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephanie
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards C. The status for all existing targets becoming Draft makes more sense than Read-only.
upvoted 0 times
Shantell
2 years ago
I agree, changing the hierarchy type will likely make the targets Draft.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
2 years ago
I think C is the correct option. Existing targets will become Draft.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
2 years ago
I agree, changing the hierarchy type will likely make the targets Draft.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
2 years ago
I think C is the correct answer. Existing targets will become Draft.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
2 years ago
Hmm, could it be that the status for all existing targets will become Draft? That way they can be reviewed or adjusted again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe the status for all existing targets will become Read-only. It makes sense for safeguarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
2 years ago
Option A can't be right, that would be too extreme. Deleting all access to existing targets doesn't make sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is B. The status for all existing targets will become Read-only, as that seems the most logical option when changing the hierarchy type.
upvoted 0 times
Chan
2 years ago
Yes, it makes sense to prevent any accidental changes to existing targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 years ago
I agree, changing the hierarchy type would make the targets read-only.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alaine
2 years ago
I think all access to existing targets will be deleted. That sounds like a strict policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 years ago
Yeah, I did. I think it's a tricky one. Do you know what will happen to existing targets?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 years ago
Did you see that question about the team member hierarchy update?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel