New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce DEX-450 Exam - Topic 4 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's DEX-450 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 4
[All DEX-450 Questions]

A developer deployed a trigger to update the status__c of Assets related to an Account when the Account''s status changes and a nightly integration that updates Accounts in bulk has started to fail with limit failures.

What should the developer change about the code to address the failure while still having the code update all of the Assets correctly?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Nichelle at Sep 13, 2024, 06:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DEX-450 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dulce
3 months ago
Adding a LIMIT clause seems like a quick fix, but is it really the best solution?
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
3 months ago
Wait, can a trigger really handle that many updates without hitting limits?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
3 months ago
Not sure if moving to a Queueable class is necessary, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
I think option C is the best way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
4 months ago
Sounds like a classic bulk processing issue!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
4 months ago
I feel like just iterating over the assets in the for loop might not be efficient enough, but I can't recall if that's a good strategy in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
4 months ago
This question reminds me of a similar practice one where we had to optimize a trigger. I think moving logic to a Queueable class could really help here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think adding a LIMIT clause might just mask the issue instead of solving it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how bulk processing is crucial to avoid governor limits, so option C seems like a good approach to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
5 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. Option A looks like the best solution - we can process all Accounts in one call and avoid the limit issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the code and the options. I'll need to spend some time really understanding what's going on before I can decide on the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The issue seems to be that the nightly integration is failing due to limit issues, so we need to optimize the code to handle more Accounts and Assets at once. I'm leaning towards Option A or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
5 months ago
Hmm, I think the key here is to find a way to reduce the number of SOQL queries and DML operations to avoid hitting governor limits. Option B or C might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the code and the options to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
5 months ago
But wouldn't a primary risk be the original one? This is confusing—I just want to make sure I get this right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
1 year ago
Option A is just asking for trouble. Trying to process all Accounts in one call? That's just begging for a governor limit exception.
upvoted 0 times
Tegan
1 year ago
Yeah, Option A sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. Processing all Accounts at once is a sure way to hit governor limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
1 year ago
I agree, breaking up the processing into smaller chunks will help prevent limit failures. Option A is too risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
1 year ago
Option A is definitely risky. It's better to process the Accounts in smaller batches to avoid hitting governor limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colette
1 year ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher. I'm just glad I'm not the one who has to figure it out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
1 year ago
I think moving all the logic to a Queueable class and calling it from the trigger could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
1 year ago
D is the way to do it! Iterating over the Assets list directly is the most straightforward approach in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Krystina
1 year ago
Let's go with option D then, hopefully it will fix the issue with the bulk updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
1 year ago
That makes sense, it should help address the failure with the nightly integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
1 year ago
Agreed, iterating over the Assets list directly seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
1 year ago
I think D is the best option too. It's the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
I agree with Viola, changing the code to process all Accounts in one call seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
1 year ago
I'd go with option B. Limiting the number of Assets queried per Account is a simple and effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
Marjory
1 year ago
Let's hope it solves the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
1 year ago
It should help with the limit failures during the nightly integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
1 year ago
That sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
1 year ago
B) Add a LIMIT clause to the SOQL query on line 16 to limit the number of Assets queried for an Account.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
1 year ago
I think the developer should change the code to process all Accounts in one call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
1 year ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Queueable classes are perfect for handling bulkier operations like this without hitting limits.
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
1 year ago
Yes, it's a good choice to avoid hitting limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
1 year ago
I agree, Queueable classes are great for bulk operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel