New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ARC-801 Exam - Topic 10 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-801 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 10
[All ARC-801 Questions]

AC Computers has decided to extend its existing Sales Cloud solution by implementing Service Cloud and Marketing Cloud Account Engagement. AC Computers has defined two different work streams for Service Cloud and Marketing Cloud Account Engagement and wants each workstream to work iteratively in separate sandboxes and migrate to a single sandbox for UAT and integration testing. With the multiple workstreams, AC Computers needs a more rigorous change management process and an audit process.

Which two options should AC Computers consider to support both implementation workstreams?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

For Universal Containers (UC), maintaining the system of record (SOR) for all orders in the ERP Order Object is the most strategic approach, especially given the ERP's role in fulfillment and invoicing. This ensures that the ERP remains the authoritative source for order data, providing a single point of truth for financial transactions and order management. Integrating Salesforce clouds with the ERP allows for seamless data flow and operational efficiency, supporting UC's digital transformation goals while leveraging the ERP's robust capabilities for order processing and financial management.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Audry
3 months ago
Not sure about B, version control can get messy sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
3 months ago
Totally agree with A, change sets are easy to manage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
3 months ago
Wait, are scratch orgs really that effective?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
4 months ago
I think C is a better choice for flexibility!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
4 months ago
A and B seem like solid options for merging builds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
I feel like package-based deployments could be a solid choice, but I’m not entirely clear on how they compare to using change sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
4 months ago
Scratch orgs were mentioned in our last practice session, but I’m a bit confused about how they fit into the continuous deployment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verdell
4 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar; using a version control system could really help with tracking changes across the workstreams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
5 months ago
I remember we discussed using multiple development sandboxes for similar scenarios, but I'm not sure if change sets are the best way to merge everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the deployment approaches mentioned. I'll need to review the details of each option to determine the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
5 months ago
I've seen similar questions before, so I think I have a good handle on this. I'll go with the options that provide the most flexibility and control over the deployment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
Okay, let me think through this step-by-step. They want a solution that supports multiple workstreams, rigorous change management, and auditing. I'll need to carefully consider the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key requirements before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I'm not sure if they want us to choose the most common scenarios or the most unique ones. I'll have to think it through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not too familiar with the Proactive Insights feature, so I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. First, I'll check the registry to see if JIT Mitigation is actually enabled for this application. Then I'll look for any installed debuggers that could be interfering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
10 months ago
Scratch orgs and continuous deployment? Sounds like a recipe for chaos and sleepless nights. I'll take the good old-fashioned change sets, thank you very much. At least I know where my code is at any given moment.
upvoted 0 times
Jaclyn
10 months ago
B) Use a version control system and CLI-based deployment tools to merge the workstream builds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
10 months ago
A) Use multiple development sandboxes and merge the workstream builds using change sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiara
11 months ago
Version control and CLI-based tools are the way to go! Keeps everything organized and trackable. Plus, I hear the Salesforce CLI is pretty slick these days. Easy to use and no more messy manual deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
11 months ago
I think using package-based deployments and scratch orgs could also be a good option to support both implementation workstreams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
11 months ago
Package-based deployments and scratch orgs sound like a solid option, but I'm curious how the audit process would work in that scenario. Gotta make sure we cover all our bases.
upvoted 0 times
Jani
9 months ago
B) Use a version control system and CLI-based deployment tools to merge the workstream builds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
9 months ago
The audit process could involve tracking changes in the packages and ensuring they align with the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
9 months ago
D) Use package-based deployments and scratch orgs to merge the workstream builds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
10 months ago
A) Use multiple development sandboxes and merge the workstream builds using change sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Susy
11 months ago
Scratch orgs and continuous deployment tools could be a good way to streamline the merge process, but I wonder if the integration testing would be a challenge with that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
11 months ago
Using change sets to merge the workstream builds seems like a straightforward approach, but I'm not sure if it will scale well with multiple workstreams. Might be worth exploring version control and CLI-based tools instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
11 months ago
I agree with Gearldine. It would ensure a more organized and controlled process for the implementation workstreams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
11 months ago
I think AC Computers should consider using multiple development sandboxes and merge the workstream builds using change sets.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel