Salesforce Exam ANC-201 Topic 6 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-201 exam

Question #: 54
Topic #: 6

[All ANC-201 Questions]

What is a benefit of introducing a second local connector?

ABetter maintenance by having a connector per recipe

BBetter deployment management between sandboxes and production environment

CBetter performance by syncing data according to the refresh necessities

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Lai at Feb 07, 2025, 07:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANC-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Asha

1 months ago

Hold up, did someone say 'second local connector'? I'm just picturing some poor IT guy trying to keep all those cables untangled. What a nightmare!

upvoted 0 times

...

Frankie

1 months ago

I'm going with C. Optimizing data syncing for refresh needs is clutch. Ain't nobody got time for unnecessary data transfers!

upvoted 0 times

Filiberto

5 days ago

I think A could also be beneficial for maintenance by having a connector per recipe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jospeh

11 days ago

Yeah, having better performance by syncing data according to refresh necessities is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricarda

16 days ago

I agree, C seems like the best option for optimizing data syncing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colby

1 months ago

Definitely B. Anything that makes deployment easier and more reliable is a winner in my book. Who needs more maintenance, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Von

2 days ago

C) Better performance by syncing data according to the refresh necessities

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonne

4 days ago

B) Better deployment management between sandboxes and production environment

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolande

5 days ago

A) Better maintenance by having a connector per recipe

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettina

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Better performance due to targeted syncing sounds really appealing, but the deployment management angle is also important.

upvoted 0 times

Brendan

1 months ago

Why not both? Having better deployment management and improved performance could be a win-win situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domonique

1 months ago

But C could also be beneficial for improving performance by syncing data as needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothea

1 months ago

I think B is important for managing deployments between sandboxes and production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

2 months ago

I think option B is the way to go. Improved deployment management between environments is a huge benefit in my experience.

upvoted 0 times

Leonard

14 days ago

Syncing data according to refresh necessities could really boost performance overall.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

24 days ago

Having a connector per recipe could also help with maintenance in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francis

1 months ago

I think option B is definitely the most practical choice for improving efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Almeta

1 months ago

I agree, having better deployment management is crucial for smooth transitions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trina

2 months ago

But wouldn't better deployment management between sandboxes and production be more beneficial in the long run?

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

2 months ago

I agree with Santos, having a connector per recipe would make maintenance easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Santos

2 months ago

I think having a second local connector would improve maintenance.

upvoted 0 times

...