New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ANC-201 Exam - Topic 6 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-201 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 6
[All ANC-201 Questions]

What is a benefit of introducing a second local connector?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Introducing a second local connector in CRM Analytics can improve performance by enabling more granular control over data syncs. By having a separate connector, different datasets or recipes can be synchronized independently based on specific refresh needs, reducing load and improving overall performance. This approach helps optimize data flow operations, especially in large-scale deployments with varying data refresh requirements.


by Kayleigh at Nov 21, 2025, 02:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANC-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lonny
3 days ago
Wait, syncing data based on refresh needs? Sounds complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
8 days ago
I think B is the best choice for deployment management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
13 days ago
A second connector can really streamline maintenance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
19 days ago
Hmm, I'll go with C. Anything that improves performance is a win in my book. Who needs sleep when you have fast data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
24 days ago
C) Better performance by syncing data according to the refresh necessities. Faster is always better, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
James
29 days ago
B) Better deployment management between sandboxes and production environment. Gotta keep those environments separate, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 month ago
A) Better maintenance by having a connector per recipe. This way, I can keep my recipes in order!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
1 month ago
C) Better performance by syncing data according to the refresh necessities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 month ago
I feel like I read something about connectors improving maintenance, so maybe A is the right choice, but I need to think it through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
2 months ago
Option C sounds familiar too; syncing data based on refresh needs could improve performance, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
2 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned deployment management, so I’m leaning towards option B, but it feels a bit vague.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I can see the benefits of both B and C. Maybe I'll just have to make an educated guess and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
2 months ago
I got this! The answer is definitely B. Separating the connectors for different environments makes deployment a breeze. Gotta love that efficiency boost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
2 months ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards C since better performance by syncing data sounds really useful. But I'll have to double-check the other options too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
3 months ago
I think option A makes sense because having a connector per recipe could simplify maintenance, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
3 months ago
C sounds good too. Syncing data is crucial for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
3 months ago
B makes sense. It reduces errors during deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'll need to think through the different benefits of having a second connector. C sounds like it could be a good option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
3 months ago
I think the answer is B. Having a second local connector would make it easier to manage deployments between different environments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel