Salesforce ANC-201 Exam - Topic 6 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-201 exam

Question #: 63
Topic #: 6

[All ANC-201 Questions]

What is a benefit of introducing a second local connector?

ABetter maintenance by having a connector per recipe

BBetter deployment management between sandboxes and production environment

CBetter performance by syncing data according to the refresh necessities

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Introducing a second local connector in CRM Analytics can improve performance by enabling more granular control over data syncs. By having a separate connector, different datasets or recipes can be synchronized independently based on specific refresh needs, reducing load and improving overall performance. This approach helps optimize data flow operations, especially in large-scale deployments with varying data refresh requirements.

by Kayleigh at Nov 21, 2025, 02:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANC-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Iluminada

10 days ago

C could really improve efficiency. Refresh needs are key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Esteban

15 days ago

A is my pick. Each recipe having its own connector is smart.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

21 days ago

I prefer B. It helps manage deployments better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beatriz

26 days ago

I think option A is great. More connectors mean easier maintenance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antione

1 month ago

Not sure about C, does it really improve performance that much?

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

1 month ago

Totally agree with A, it makes recipe management way easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

2 months ago

Wait, syncing data based on refresh needs? Sounds complicated!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lottie

2 months ago

I think B is the best choice for deployment management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonardo

2 months ago

A second connector can really streamline maintenance!

upvoted 0 times

...

Leandro

2 months ago

Hmm, I'll go with C. Anything that improves performance is a win in my book. Who needs sleep when you have fast data?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

3 months ago

C) Better performance by syncing data according to the refresh necessities. Faster is always better, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

James

3 months ago

B) Better deployment management between sandboxes and production environment. Gotta keep those environments separate, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

3 months ago

A) Better maintenance by having a connector per recipe. This way, I can keep my recipes in order!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elliot

3 months ago

C) Better performance by syncing data according to the refresh necessities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

3 months ago

I feel like I read something about connectors improving maintenance, so maybe A is the right choice, but I need to think it through more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorita

3 months ago

Option C sounds familiar too; syncing data based on refresh needs could improve performance, but I can't recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebbecca

4 months ago

I remember a practice question that mentioned deployment management, so I’m leaning towards option B, but it feels a bit vague.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leah

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I can see the benefits of both B and C. Maybe I'll just have to make an educated guess and move on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvis

4 months ago

I got this! The answer is definitely B. Separating the connectors for different environments makes deployment a breeze. Gotta love that efficiency boost.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

4 months ago

Ooh, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards C since better performance by syncing data sounds really useful. But I'll have to double-check the other options too.

upvoted 0 times

...