New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Real Estate Licensing Massachusetts-Real-Estate-Salesperson Exam - Topic 8 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Real Estate Licensing's Massachusetts-Real-Estate-Salesperson exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 8
[All Massachusetts-Real-Estate-Salesperson Questions]

Which of the following activities may result in a fine from the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) against a licensee?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) is the state agency responsible for enforcing the Massachusetts Fair Housing Law (M.G.L. c. 151B). Blockbusting is the illegal practice of inducing homeowners to sell by suggesting that protected classes of people (such as minorities, families with children, or people receiving public assistance) are moving into the neighborhood, often suggesting declining property values.

This practice is explicitly prohibited under both federal law (Fair Housing Act) and Massachusetts General Law. MCAD has the authority to investigate complaints of housing discrimination and levy fines against licensees found guilty of such violations.

While misrepresentation or undisclosed dual capacity may lead to disciplinary action by the Massachusetts Board of Registration of Real Estate Brokers and Salespersons, only violations of fair housing law, such as blockbusting, steering, or refusing to deal with members of protected classes, fall under the jurisdiction of MCAD.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Essie
3 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'd say option D is the way to go. Failing to provide copies of the purchase and sales agreement is a pretty serious offense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
8 days ago
Option C seems like the most obvious choice here. Acting as both a broker and an undisclosed principal is a big no-no.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
13 days ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Knowingly making any substantial misrepresentation can definitely result in a fine from the MCAD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
18 days ago
I know failing to provide copies of agreements is a violation, but I’m not sure if it leads to fines specifically from MCAD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
23 days ago
I’m a bit confused about the dual capacity issue; I feel like it might be a gray area, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
29 days ago
I remember practicing a question about misrepresentation, and I think that one could also result in penalties from MCAD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 month ago
I think blockbusting is definitely one of those activities that can lead to fines, but I'm not entirely sure about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 month ago
I'm a bit confused on the MCAD stuff. I know it deals with discrimination, but the details of what's considered a violation are hazy for me. Gonna have to review that section again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
1 month ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. I'm confident B and C are correct, but I'm not 100% on the other options. Gotta be careful with MCAD rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
2 months ago
Okay, let me see. I'm pretty sure making misrepresentations is a violation, and failing to provide copies of the purchase agreement seems like it could be too. I'll double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the specifics of MCAD regulations. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
2 months ago
I think I know the answer to this one. Blockbusting and acting as a dual agent without disclosure are definitely MCAD violations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel