Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Real Estate Licensing Massachusetts-Real-Estate-Salesperson Exam - Topic 8 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Real Estate Licensing's Massachusetts-Real-Estate-Salesperson exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 8
[All Massachusetts-Real-Estate-Salesperson Questions]

In a jurisdiction where the common law of agency applies, a broker has listed a home and then presented to the seller an offer from another client of the broker. The offer has been accepted. The broker has what type of agency relationship with the parties?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (150--250 words):

Under the common law of agency, an agent owes fiduciary duties to the party they represent. If a broker represents a seller under a listing agreement but also brings a buyer who is their client, the broker now represents both parties in the same transaction. This creates a dual agency relationship.

Dual agency is lawful in Massachusetts only if there is full disclosure and written informed consent from both parties. Without disclosure, it would be an undisclosed dual agency, which is illegal.

A: Incorrect --- the broker does represent the buyer.

B: Facilitation is a non-agency relationship, but that's not the case here.

C: Buyer is not a sub-agent of the seller; they are a client.

Correct answer: D: dual agency.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lynette
1 day ago
But the broker has to facilitate the buyer too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
6 days ago
I disagree. It's seller agency, no agency with the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
11 days ago
I’m surprised this is allowed in some places!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
17 days ago
Pretty sure it's C, seller agency and buyer sub-agency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
22 days ago
Wait, how can the broker represent both without a conflict?
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
27 days ago
I'm going with D. Dual agency. The broker is caught in the middle here, representing both sides.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
Dual agency? More like "duel agency" am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
2 months ago
D. Dual agency. The broker is acting on behalf of both the seller and the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
2 months ago
B. No agency relationship; the broker is just a facilitator in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
2 months ago
C. Seller agency, buyer sub-agency. The broker is representing both the seller and the buyer, even if indirectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
2 months ago
I think the answer is D. Dual agency makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards A, seller agency, but I’m confused about whether the broker has any obligations to the buyer in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
3 months ago
I feel like this is similar to a practice question we did on agency relationships, but I can't recall if it was specifically about sub-agency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
3 months ago
I think the answer might be D, dual agency, because the broker is involved with both the seller and the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
3 months ago
I remember studying that in dual agency, the broker represents both parties, but I'm not sure if that's the case here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
3 months ago
I think the key here is that the broker presented an offer from another client. That suggests they have some kind of agency relationship with the buyer, even if it's not a full representation. I'm going to go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know dual agency is when the broker represents both the seller and the buyer, but I'm not sure if that applies here. I'll have to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
3 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The broker listed the home for the seller, so they have a seller agency relationship. But then they presented an offer from another client, so they might have a sub-agency relationship with the buyer as well. I'm leaning towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
4 months ago
I think it's dual agency. The broker represents both parties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
4 months ago
I thought it was just seller agency, but dual agency makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
4 months ago
It's definitely dual agency since the broker represents both parties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
4 months ago
Not necessarily. If the seller is the main client, it's seller agency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is the broker representing both the seller and the buyer, or is the broker just acting as a facilitator with no agency relationship?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
5 months ago
I think this is a dual agency situation, where the broker has an agency relationship with both the seller and the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
Sina
4 months ago
As long as both parties are informed, it should be fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel