New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI DASSM Exam - Topic 5 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's DASSM exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 5
[All DASSM Questions]

True or False: In general, it is preferable to have long standing product teams rather than ad-hoc or project based teams.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Mari at Dec 27, 2023, 01:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DASSM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Johnetta
2 months ago
Really? I thought ad-hoc teams could be more agile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
2 months ago
Not always true, sometimes fresh teams bring new ideas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
2 months ago
Totally agree, consistency matters!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
3 months ago
Research shows stability leads to higher productivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
3 months ago
Long-standing teams build better cohesion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
3 months ago
I recall a case study that suggested long-term teams are more efficient, but I wonder if that applies to every situation. Maybe it depends on the context?
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
3 months ago
I’m a bit uncertain here. I know ad-hoc teams can be effective for specific projects, but I think long-standing teams might have advantages in knowledge retention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
4 months ago
I feel like this question is similar to one we practiced about team dynamics. I lean towards True, but I could see arguments for both sides.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
4 months ago
I think I remember reading that long-standing teams can build better cohesion, but I'm not entirely sure if that's always the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
4 months ago
I recall discussing how ad-hoc teams can be more flexible, but I still think long-standing teams might have an edge in knowledge retention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused; I can see the advantages of both types of teams. Maybe it depends on the project scope?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this in class, and it leaned towards "True" because of the benefits of team stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
5 months ago
I think I remember reading that long-standing teams can build better cohesion, but I'm not entirely sure if that's always the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I can see arguments on both sides. Maybe I'll just have to make an educated guess on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
5 months ago
Easy peasy! Long-standing teams are always better for product development. The institutional knowledge and team dynamics make them way more effective. Gotta be True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
5 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I can see the benefits of both approaches. I'll have to weigh the evidence and make my best judgment call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. There are pros and cons to both long-term and ad-hoc teams. I'll have to think it through carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
5 months ago
I think this is a pretty straightforward question. Long-standing product teams tend to have better cohesion and understanding of the product, so I'll go with True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
5 months ago
Okay, I remember from the lectures that the service label is used for VPRN traffic, and it's advertised using LDP. So I'm pretty sure the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The ActiveMatrix BusinessWorks engine is running, so the issue must be with the TIBCO Adapter on M2. I'm guessing the TIBCO Hawk Agent on M2 is down, causing the adapter status to be "Unknown".
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident the answer is A - Eavesdropping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
9 months ago
Depends on the product, I guess. A little team shakeup can't hurt, right? Keeps them on their toes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
9 months ago
Long-standing teams? More like long-suffering teams, am I right? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Roselle
8 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
8 months ago
Long-standing teams can definitely have their challenges, but they also bring stability and continuity to projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
8 months ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
8 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Moon
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn. There are good arguments on both sides. I'll have to think this one through.
upvoted 0 times
Lon
8 months ago
Long standing teams can build strong relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
8 months ago
It really depends on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
8 months ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
8 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronique
10 months ago
That's a good point. It really depends on the situation and goals of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
10 months ago
I disagree. Ad-hoc teams can bring fresh perspectives and adaptability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
10 months ago
I think it's true. Long standing teams have better collaboration and understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
10 months ago
False, ad-hoc teams bring fresh perspectives and can be more agile in responding to changing market needs.
upvoted 0 times
Venita
9 months ago
True, long standing product teams can have better cohesion and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
9 months ago
Ad-hoc teams can definitely bring fresh perspectives and be more agile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
10 months ago
I disagree, ad-hoc teams can bring new ideas and adapt quickly to changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
10 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jordan
10 months ago
That's a good point. It really depends on the specific project and goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
11 months ago
I disagree. Ad-hoc teams can bring fresh perspectives and adaptability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
11 months ago
True, long-standing product teams can build deep domain expertise and deliver more consistent results.
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
10 months ago
Long-standing teams can also improve communication and collaboration among team members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
10 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
10 months ago
I agree, having long-standing product teams can lead to better outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
10 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jordan
11 months ago
I think it's true. Long standing teams can build better rapport and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel