New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGAPCBA87V1 Exam - Topic 8 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCBA87V1 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 8
[All PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions]

You are configuring an accident claim case for an automobile insurance company with two child cases as illustrated.

How do you suspend the parent case processing until the child cases are resolved?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

These answers are correct because they prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved, as per the requirement. By adding each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim, you can create a case hierarchy that allows you to manage related cases together. By adding a wait step to the accident claim case, you can pause the parent case until all child cases reach a specific status, such as Resolved. Reference: https://academy.pega.com/library/87/pega-certified-business-architect-pcba-87v1 (Module 5: Case Hierarchy)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Natalie
3 months ago
D sounds too short, what if the child cases take longer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
3 months ago
C is a good idea, but it doesn't actually pause the parent case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
3 months ago
Wait, can you really just add a 30-day wait? Seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
4 months ago
A won't work, you need to pause the parent case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
4 months ago
B is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that a wait step is the right approach, but I’m torn between that and the 30-day wait option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
4 months ago
Adding an approval step sounds familiar, but I feel like that might not actually pause the parent case like we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where adding a service level agreement was mentioned, but it seems more about timelines than suspension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
5 months ago
I remember discussing how a wait step can effectively pause the parent case, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one, but I think the answer is B. Adding a wait step to the parent case is the best way to suspend the processing until the child cases are resolved. That's the approach I'm going to go with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The options don't seem to directly address suspending the parent case processing. I'll need to re-read the question and think about it some more before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I think the best approach would be to add a wait step to the parent case, as that would pause the processing until the child cases are resolved. Option B seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking how to suspend the parent case processing, but none of the options seem to directly address that. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to suspend the parent case processing until the child cases are resolved, so I'd go with option B - adding a wait step to the parent case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
10 months ago
Wait, we're supposed to resolve the child cases first? I thought insurance was all about finding loopholes to avoid payments. Option B is the way to go, let's just put the whole thing on hold!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
10 months ago
Service level agreement? This isn't a corporate boardroom, this is an insurance claim. Option B is the way to go, hit that pause button on the parent case.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
8 months ago
Let's keep it simple and just add a wait step to the parent case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
8 months ago
Adding an approval step to each child case seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
9 months ago
I agree, option B is the most practical solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefany
10 months ago
Approving each child case? What is this, a bureaucratic nightmare? Option B is the clear winner, suspend that parent case and let the kids run wild.
upvoted 0 times
Lachelle
9 months ago
Yeah, let's keep it simple and just add a wait step to the parent case. No need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
9 months ago
I agree, adding an approval step to each child case sounds like unnecessary red tape. Option B is much simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
9 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go, let the parent case chill while the children sort themselves out.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Goldie
10 months ago
Hmm, a 30-day wait for the child cases? That's like hoping your toddlers will clean their room in a month. Option B is the only logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
10 months ago
Ah, the classic suspend-the-parent-until-the-kids-are-done move. Option B seems like the way to go, let's just put that parent case on hold until the little ones sort themselves out.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
9 months ago
Yeah, that seems like the most efficient way to handle this situation. Let's go with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
10 months ago
I agree, Option B is the best choice. Let's pause the parent case and focus on resolving the child cases first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelia
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but adding an approval step to each child case could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
I agree with Giovanna, adding a wait step to the parent case makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
11 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel