Pegasystems PEGAPCBA87V1 Exam - Topic 8 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCBA87V1 exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 8

[All PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions]

You are configuring an accident claim case for an automobile insurance company with two child cases as illustrated.

How do you suspend the parent case processing until the child cases are resolved?

AAdd an approval step to each of the child cases to resolve the cases.

BAdd a wait step to the parent case pausing the parent case until the child cases resolve.

CAdd a service level agreement to resolve the child cases within 90 days.

DAdd a 30-day wait to the parent case to allow time for the child cases to resolve.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

These answers are correct because they prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved, as per the requirement. By adding each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim, you can create a case hierarchy that allows you to manage related cases together. By adding a wait step to the accident claim case, you can pause the parent case until all child cases reach a specific status, such as Resolved. Reference: https://academy.pega.com/library/87/pega-certified-business-architect-pcba-87v1 (Module 5: Case Hierarchy)

by Aleisha at Jan 09, 2025, 05:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Natalie

6 months ago

D sounds too short, what if the child cases take longer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonna

6 months ago

C is a good idea, but it doesn't actually pause the parent case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anika

6 months ago

Wait, can you really just add a 30-day wait? Seems risky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Aimee

7 months ago

A won't work, you need to pause the parent case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

7 months ago

B is definitely the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

7 months ago

I vaguely recall that a wait step is the right approach, but I’m torn between that and the 30-day wait option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicitas

7 months ago

Adding an approval step sounds familiar, but I feel like that might not actually pause the parent case like we need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

7 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where adding a service level agreement was mentioned, but it seems more about timelines than suspension.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catina

8 months ago

I remember discussing how a wait step can effectively pause the parent case, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

8 months ago

This seems like a tricky one, but I think the answer is B. Adding a wait step to the parent case is the best way to suspend the processing until the child cases are resolved. That's the approach I'm going to go with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

8 months ago

I'm a little confused by this question. The options don't seem to directly address suspending the parent case processing. I'll need to re-read the question and think about it some more before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elliott

8 months ago

Okay, let's see here. I think the best approach would be to add a wait step to the parent case, as that would pause the processing until the child cases are resolved. Option B seems like the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandee

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking how to suspend the parent case processing, but none of the options seem to directly address that. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettina

8 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to suspend the parent case processing until the child cases are resolved, so I'd go with option B - adding a wait step to the parent case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alberta

1 year ago

Wait, we're supposed to resolve the child cases first? I thought insurance was all about finding loopholes to avoid payments. Option B is the way to go, let's just put the whole thing on hold!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alise

1 year ago

Service level agreement? This isn't a corporate boardroom, this is an insurance claim. Option B is the way to go, hit that pause button on the parent case.

upvoted 0 times

Novella

11 months ago

Let's keep it simple and just add a wait step to the parent case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

11 months ago

Adding an approval step to each child case seems like overkill.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolf

12 months ago

I agree, option B is the most practical solution here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

1 year ago

Approving each child case? What is this, a bureaucratic nightmare? Option B is the clear winner, suspend that parent case and let the kids run wild.

upvoted 0 times

Lachelle

12 months ago

Yeah, let's keep it simple and just add a wait step to the parent case. No need to overcomplicate things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

12 months ago

I agree, adding an approval step to each child case sounds like unnecessary red tape. Option B is much simpler.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leanora

1 year ago

Option B is definitely the way to go, let the parent case chill while the children sort themselves out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

1 year ago

Hmm, a 30-day wait for the child cases? That's like hoping your toddlers will clean their room in a month. Option B is the only logical choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nell

1 year ago

Ah, the classic suspend-the-parent-until-the-kids-are-done move. Option B seems like the way to go, let's just put that parent case on hold until the little ones sort themselves out.

upvoted 0 times