New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGAPCBA87V1 Exam - Topic 7 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCBA87V1 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 7
[All PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions]

A retail company wants to provide a tracking tool for customers to enter their order number and see the order status, package location, and estimated delivery date. A small number of customers have requested a visualization tool that allows them to see a map with the path their package has traveled.

Which option fits the scope for the minimum lovable product (MLP) based on Pega best practices?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Nell
3 months ago
I think C is too much for an MLP, just stick with D!
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
3 months ago
A simple status view is enough, so A might work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
Wait, why would we need a map? Seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
4 months ago
I agree, D covers all the basics!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
4 months ago
Option D seems the most practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think option B is essential because customers need to enter their order number first before seeing any details.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
4 months ago
I feel like option C might be too much for the MLP since it includes the map feature, which not all customers requested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about focusing on the core functionality first, so maybe option A is a better fit?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
5 months ago
I think option D makes the most sense because it combines the order status and delivery date with the action of entering the order number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. Allowing the customer to enter their order number and see the updated status and delivery date seems like the most essential functionality to include in the first version. The map can be added later as an enhancement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The core requirement is to provide a tracking tool for customers to check their order status and delivery date. The map visualization is an additional nice-to-have feature, but not essential for the minimum viable product. I'd go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It mentions a "minimum lovable product" which I haven't heard of before. I'll need to re-read the details carefully to make sure I understand the exact requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about identifying the minimum viable product based on the given requirements. I think the key is to focus on the core functionality that meets the customer's needs while keeping the scope small.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
1 year ago
Option B all the way! No need to reinvent the wheel. Keep it simple and let the customers' needs guide the development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
1 year ago
Option B is the clear winner here. Why spend time on a map tool when customers just want to check their order status?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
1 year ago
Option C sounds cool, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. Option B is the safest bet for an MLP.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
1 year ago
Exactly, it's important to prioritize functionality and usability in the initial release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
1 year ago
That way we can ensure we have a solid foundation before adding more complex features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
1 year ago
Once we have that working smoothly, we can consider adding more features like the map in option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
1 year ago
I agree, starting with option B is a good idea to keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominque
1 year ago
Yeah, Option B makes the most sense. Save the fancy maps for a future iteration once the basics are nailed down.
upvoted 0 times
Beatriz
1 year ago
Definitely, we can always add more features later on once we have the basic tracking system in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. Let's keep it simple and focus on the essentials first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
1 year ago
Option B) A view where the customer can enter their order number
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valda
1 year ago
I agree, Option B is the most logical choice. No need to overcomplicate things with a visualization tool at this stage.
upvoted 0 times
Jesusa
1 year ago
I agree with you, let's keep it simple for now with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
1 year ago
I think Option C would be great for customers who want to track their package visually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
1 year ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. Simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dyan
1 year ago
I see both points, but I think option C would provide a more engaging and interactive experience for customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient as it updates the details when the customer enters the order number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
1 year ago
Option B is the way to go. Keeping it simple and focused on the core functionality is key for an MLP.
upvoted 0 times
Tomoko
1 year ago
Let's go with option B for the tracking tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 year ago
Option B keeps the focus on the core functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
1 year ago
Agreed, simplicity is important for the minimum lovable product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hillary
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice because customers want to see the path their package has traveled.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel