Pegasystems PEGACPSA88V1 Exam - Topic 7 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam

Question #: 29
Topic #: 7

Users create Insurance Coverage Request Cases to authorize insurance payments. Users

enter information that includes the name of the patient, the date of the procedure and the type of the procedure. After entering the information, user submits the request for a review of the patient's insurance policy. Because multiple users enter requests, duplicate request can occur. A request is considered a duplicate if the patient name, procedure type, procedure date match an existing request. You have been given two requirements:

- Ensure that users can identify duplicate requests.

- If a case is duplicate, it is not written to the database. Otherwise, write the case to the database.

Which two options configure application so that users can identify duplicate requests? (Choose two)

AAdd a duplicate search step to the case life cycle design.

BConfigure a duplicate search decision table and add it to a Decision shape

CConfigure weighted conditions.

DConfigure a validate rule to validate matching cases.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D

by Fidelia at Aug 04, 2024, 10:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPSA88V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Marguerita

4 months ago

Definitely A and B, those should work well together!

upvoted 0 times

...

Teri

5 months ago

Wait, can a validate rule really catch all duplicates? Sounds tricky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sue

5 months ago

Not sure about C, weighted conditions might complicate things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chuck

5 months ago

I think B is a solid option too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

5 months ago

Option A seems like the best choice for identifying duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefanie

6 months ago

I’m leaning towards the validate rule option since it directly checks for matching cases, but I need to double-check if that’s what we discussed in class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

6 months ago

Weighted conditions seem a bit off for this scenario; I don't recall them being used for duplicates in the practice questions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

6 months ago

I remember practicing with decision tables, and I feel like configuring a duplicate search decision table could be a solid choice for identifying duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

6 months ago

I think adding a duplicate search step to the case life cycle could help users spot duplicates right away, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

6 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if configuring weighted conditions (option C) or a validate rule (option D) are the best ways to handle this. Those seem more like general validation approaches, rather than specifically targeting duplicate detection. I'm leaning towards A and B as the most appropriate options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

6 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The first requirement is about identifying duplicates, so options A and B seem like the way to go. Adding a duplicate search step to the case life cycle or configuring a decision table for duplicate detection should do the trick. The other options don't seem as directly relevant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elly

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'm not sure what a "duplicate search step" or a "duplicate search decision table" are. I'll need to review those concepts before I can confidently choose the right options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilburn

6 months ago

This looks like a straightforward question about identifying and handling duplicate insurance coverage requests. I think the key is to focus on the requirements - we need to ensure users can identify duplicates, and not write duplicates to the database.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

6 months ago

Okay, this looks straightforward. I'll try option A, inputlookup, since that seems to be the command mentioned in the question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimbery

6 months ago

Okay, let's think this through. I'm pretty confident that options A, D, and E are benefits, but I'm not sure about B and C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Torie

6 months ago

I remember we talked about visualizing model performance, but I'm not sure if the histograms would show the degradation effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valene

2 years ago

I'm not sure about option C and D, they don't seem relevant to identifying duplicate requests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rikki

2 years ago

Duplicate requests, huh? I bet the people who enter these are as duplicitous as the cases themselves. Just kidding, just kidding... or am I?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

2 years ago

Ha! Option C, 'Configure weighted conditions'? What is this, a fortune-telling exam? I'll stick with A and B, thank you very much.

upvoted 0 times

...

Suzi

2 years ago

I agree with Mariann, adding a duplicate search step and decision table would help identify duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

2 years ago

Hold up, what about option D? Validating the cases with a rule could work too, right? Just throwing that out there.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenda

2 years ago

I agree, A and B are the way to go. Gotta make sure we catch those duplicates before they hit the database!

upvoted 0 times

Joanne

2 years ago

B) Configure a duplicate search decision table and add it to a Decision shape.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

2 years ago

A) Add a duplicate search step to the case life cycle design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariann

2 years ago

I think option A and B are the correct ones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

2 years ago

I'm not sure about option C and D, they seem less relevant to identifying duplicate requests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizette

2 years ago

Definitely options A and B. Adding a duplicate search step and configuring a decision table are the best ways to handle this issue.

upvoted 0 times

Layla

2 years ago

Yes, adding a duplicate search step and configuring a decision table will definitely help in identifying and handling duplicate cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

2 years ago

I agree, options A and B seem like the most effective ways to prevent duplicate requests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

2 years ago

I agree with Julene, adding a duplicate search step and decision table would help identify duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julene

2 years ago

I think option A and B are the best choices.

upvoted 0 times

...