New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGACPLSA88V1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPLSA88V1 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 3
[All PEGACPLSA88V1 Questions]

Case Type A and Case Type B capture information about multiple line items. Each line item is an Instance erf the same Line Item data type. Separate work pool classes are used for Case Types A and B.

What is the optimal data model design to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Embedded List with Declare Index:

Both Case Types A and B possess an embedded list of line items. Using a Declare Index against each embedded list ensures efficient data retrieval and indexing.

Changing the direct inheritance class for each Declare Index class to the Line Item data type allows for proper data management and querying.

Reference:

Pega best practices for data modeling and indexing recommend using Declare Index for embedded lists to enhance performance and data organization.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

D . Case Types A and B both possess an embedded list of line items. Define a Declare Index against each embedded list. Change the direct inheritance class for each Declare Index class to the Line Item data type.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Fausto
3 months ago
I disagree, D complicates things too much for my taste.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
3 months ago
Wait, D suggests embedding? That’s unexpected!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
3 months ago
C sounds a bit redundant with two refs, not sure about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
4 months ago
I think A is the best choice, keeps it simple!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
Option B seems solid with the ObjClass and CaseTypeRef.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that using embedded lists, like in option D, could simplify data management, but I’m not entirely confident about the Declare Index part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
4 months ago
I feel like option C could complicate things with two separate references. It seems like it might be overkill for just distinguishing between A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
4 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar; it might be similar to a practice question we did about using ObjClass for data retrieval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how adding a CaseTypeRef could help differentiate between the line items for each case type, but I'm not sure if it's the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
5 months ago
This is a good test of my data modeling skills. I'll need to weigh the trade-offs of each approach and try to identify the most optimal solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think option B looks like the best approach to handle the case type references and queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
5 months ago
Okay, I think I have a strategy here. I'll focus on how the line items are associated with the case types and try to determine the most efficient way to model that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different case types and how they relate to the line items. I'll need to re-read the question and think through the relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky data modeling question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and think through the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers came up with these options just to mess with us. Who needs Case Type A and Case Type B when you can just have Case Type Chaos?
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
1 year ago
I prefer option C, it seems like the most efficient design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
1 year ago
Option D is an interesting approach, but it might get messy if you have a large number of line items. Embedding the lists could make the data model more complex than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Gretchen
1 year ago
Option D is an interesting approach, but it might get messy if you have a large number of line items. Embedding the lists could make the data model more complex than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
C) Add CaseTypeARef and CaseTypeBRef properties to the Line Item data type. The CaseTypeARef property is a case reference to Case Type A. The CaseTypeBRef property is a case reference to Case Type B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
1 year ago
B) Add a CsseTypeRef property, an ObjClass property, and Query property related to the Line Item data type. The Query property sources a Lookup Data Page that accepts ObjClass and CaseTypeRef parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
1 year ago
A) Add a CaseTypeRef property to the Line Item data type. Case Types A and B possess a Query (tisf Uneltem) property. This List Query property sources a D_UneltemList data page that accepts a pylD parameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jannette
1 year ago
You know, I'm surprised they didn't include an option for storing the line items in a NoSQL database. That would really throw a wrench in the works!
upvoted 0 times
Lai
1 year ago
C) Add CaseTypeARef and CaseTypeBRef properties to the Line Item data type. The CaseTypeARef property is a case reference to Case Type A. The CaseTypeBRef property is a case reference to Case Type B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 year ago
B) Add a CsseTypeRef property, an ObjClass property, and Query property related to the Line Item data type. The Query property sources a Lookup Data Page that accepts ObjClass and CaseTypeRef parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
A) Add a CaseTypeRef property to the Line Item data type. Case Types A and B possess a Query (tisf Uneltem) property. This List Query property sources a D_UneltemList data page that accepts a pylD parameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Haydee
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
1 year ago
Option B seems the most logical choice. Having separate CaseTypeRef and ObjClass properties along with a Lookup Data Page that can accept both parameters sounds like a robust and flexible data model design.
upvoted 0 times
Portia
1 year ago
I prefer Option B as well, it offers more flexibility with the Lookup Data Page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
1 year ago
Option C might be simpler with separate CaseTypeARef and CaseTypeBRef properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
1 year ago
I think Option A could also work well, with the List Query property sourcing a data page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
1 year ago
I agree, Option B does seem like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pansy
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel