Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam - Topic 5 Question 37 Discussion

Posted by Keena on Jun 01, 2024 at 07:29 PM

Scenario 9:

OpenTech, headquartered in San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions. Its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients to transition smoothly into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.

Recently, Tim, the internal auditor of OpenTech, conducted an internal audit that uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities. In response to these nonconformities, OpenTech decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to address the issues systematically. This method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of the issues. The approach involves several steps: First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.

Following the analysis of the root causes of the nonconformities, OpenTech's ISMS project manager, Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity. While assessing potential corrective actions, Julia identified one issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its recurrence. Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Julia then combined all the nonconformities into a single action plan and sought approval from top management. The submitted action plan was written as follows:

"A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department."

However, Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management. The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval. Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process. Additionally, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.

Which method did OpenTech choose to use for addressing and preventing reoccurring problems after identifying the nonconformities?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
MY
Myrtie 10 months ago
I can't believe they missed the deadline! What were they thinking?
LE
Lemuel 11 months ago
I think they should've used DMAIC instead.
AS
Ashton 11 months ago
Wait, they submitted a general action plan? That's risky!
GI
Gilberto 11 months ago
Totally agree, that approach fits their situation well.
AN
Andra 11 months ago
Sounds like they went with the 8Ds method.
NI
Nickolas 12 months ago
I recall practicing a similar question where the 8Ds method was highlighted for its systematic approach to problem-solving. That seems to align well with OpenTech's actions.
JO
Joye 12 months ago
The focus on identifying and correcting root causes makes me lean towards the Lean Six Sigma method, but I could be mixing it up with the 8Ds approach.
JE
Jesusa 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about DMAIC being more structured for process improvement. Maybe that's what they chose?
DA
Daniela 1 year ago
I think OpenTech used the Eight Disciplines Problem Solving method because it emphasizes teamwork and root cause analysis, which fits the scenario.
MA
Mariann 1 year ago
This is a great example of a real-world problem-solving scenario. I like how the passage provides a lot of context and details about the company's situation and the steps they took. I think the key is to focus on the specific terminology and methodology that's described, rather than trying to rely on prior knowledge. With a careful reading, I believe I can determine the correct answer.
JE
Jessenia 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by all the different problem-solving methods mentioned. The passage covers a lot of ground, and I'm not sure I fully understand the distinctions between them. I'll need to re-read the details carefully and try to identify the specific approach that OpenTech used, rather than just guessing.
FR
Francesco 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the details provided, it seems like OpenTech used the Eight Disciplines Problem Solving (8Ds) method to address the nonconformities. The steps they followed, like establishing a team, identifying root causes, and implementing corrective actions, align with the 8Ds approach. I'm feeling pretty confident about this one.
PR
Princess 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. There are a few different problem-solving methodologies mentioned, and I'm not entirely sure which one OpenTech actually used. I'll need to pay close attention to the specific steps and terminology described in the passage to determine the right answer.
BE
Bethanie 1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward problem-solving scenario. The key details I'm looking for are the specific method that OpenTech used, which is mentioned in the passage. I'll carefully read through the details to identify the correct approach.
BE
Bernardo 1 year ago
This seems straightforward. I'll focus on the key actions mentioned in the question - generating an event and using account information from Salesforce.
CA
Candida 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The question mentions a power shortage, so I'm not confident that all the objects would remain accessible. I'll need to carefully consider the options before making a choice.
ET
Ettie 1 year ago
This is a good example of how the GDPR can protect consumers from deceptive data practices. I'll make sure to thoroughly explain my reasoning for the answer.
EM
Emmett 1 year ago
The 8D method is definitely the answer here. It's like a superhero team for solving problems - assemble the experts, identify the root causes, and save the day. Though I hope Julia remembered to bring her caffeine pills for the all-nighters ahead.
TI
Tiara 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emmett
Let's hope Julia has her caffeine pills ready for those all-nighters!
AS
Asuncion 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emmett
Definitely! Assemble the experts, identify the root causes, and save the day.
AL
Alpha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emmett
I agree, the 8D method is like having a problem-solving superhero team!
BU
Buddy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emmett
C) Lean Six Sigma method
FE
Felix 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emmett
B) DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) method
LA
Lauran 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emmett
A) The Eight Disciplines Problem Solving (8Ds) method
VA
Vanda 1 year ago
Hmm, the 8D method does seem like the most appropriate choice. Though I can't help but wonder if Julia's procrastination was because she was busy binge-watching the latest tech startup drama. Hey, even ISMS project managers need a break, right?
VA
Vashti 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vanda
Alverta: True, everyone needs a break sometimes, even ISMS project managers.
SA
Samuel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vanda
User 3: Maybe Julia was too caught up in that tech startup drama to meet the deadline for submission.
AL
Alverta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vanda
User 2: Yeah, it's a structured approach that can really help in situations like this.
DU
Dulce 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vanda
User 1: The 8D method is definitely the way to go for addressing and preventing reoccurring problems.
SH
Shawna 1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe they used the DMAIC method instead.
NG
Nguyet 1 year ago
I agree with Ryan. The 8Ds method involves a team-oriented approach to address root causes.
CH
Charlene 1 year ago
I agree, the 8D method is the way to go. It's a comprehensive approach that addresses the root causes and ensures the issues don't come back. Though I have to say, delaying the action plan submission? That's not very 'OpenTech' of them!
LA
Latosha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlene
User 2
VI
Viola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlene
User 1
KI
Kizzy 2 years ago
The 8D method seems like the clear choice here, with its focus on establishing a team, defining the problem, and implementing permanent corrective actions. This aligns well with the details provided in the scenario.
GE
Gerri 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kizzy
A) The Eight Disciplines Problem Solving (8Ds) method
XO
Xochitl 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kizzy
I agree, the 8D method is the best fit for addressing and preventing reoccurring problems. It involves a team-oriented approach and focuses on identifying root causes.
ZO
Zoila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kizzy
C) Lean Six Sigma method
AD
Adolph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kizzy
B) DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) method
CA
Carmelina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kizzy
A) The Eight Disciplines Problem Solving (8Ds) method
RY
Ryan 2 years ago
I think OpenTech chose the Eight Disciplines Problem Solving (8Ds) method.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel