Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Questions
- PECB Continuing Professional Development CPD Certifications
- PECB Implementer Certifications
- PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Implementer Certifications
- Topic 1: Fundamental principles and concepts of an information security management system: This topic covers information security basics, emphasizing confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA), along with the importance of risk management in establishing a robust Information Security Management System (ISMS).
- Topic 2: Information security management system requirements: This topic explores ISO/IEC 27001's detailed requirements, including its structure and terminology. Moreover, the topic also highlights compliance with legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations essential for effective information security management.
- Topic 3: Planning of an ISMS implementation based on ISO/IEC 27001: It involves conducting a gap analysis, setting ISMS objectives, identifying risks and opportunities, and developing a Statement of Applicability (SoA) to guide implementation efforts effectively.
- Topic 4: Implementation of an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001: The topic focuses on establishing policies, procedures, and controls, and managing resources. The sections also delve into conducting training programs for staff awareness and ensuring proper documentation to meet compliance requirements.
- Topic 5: Monitoring and measurement of an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001: This area discusses performance evaluation methods, the significance of internal audits, and the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to assess the effectiveness of the ISMS continuously.
- Topic 6: Continual improvement of an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001: This topic emphasizes processes for ongoing improvement based on feedback and audits, implementing corrective actions, preventive measures, and conducting management reviews to enhance the ISMS continually.
Free PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Actual Questions
Note: Premium Questions for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer were last updated On Jul. 05, 2026 (see below)
Scenario 1:
HealthGenic is a leading multi-specialty healthcare organization providing patients with comprehensive medical services in Toronto, Canad
a. The organization relies heavily on a web-based medical software platform to monitor patient health, schedule appointments, generate customized medical reports, securely store patient data, and facilitate seamless communication among various stakeholders, including patients, physicians, and medical laboratory staff.
As the organization expanded its services and demand grew, frequent and prolonged service interruptions became more common, causing significant disruptions to patient care and administrative processes. As such, HealthGenic initiated a comprehensive risk analysis to assess the severity of risks it faced.
When comparing the risk analysis results with its risk criteria to determine whether the risk and its significance were acceptable or tolerable, HealthGenic noticed a critical gap in its capacity planning and infrastructure resilience. Recognizing the urgency of this issue, HealthGenic reached out to the software development company responsible for its platform. Utilizing its expertise in healthcare technology, data management, and compliance regulations, the software development company successfully resolved the service interruptions.
However, HealthGenic also uncovered unauthorized changes to user access controls. Consequently, some medical reports were altered, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate medical records. The company swiftly acknowledged and corrected the unintentional changes to user access controls. When analyzing the root cause of these changes, HealthGenic identified a vulnerability related to the segregation of duties within the IT department, which allowed individuals with system administration access also to manage user access controls. Therefore, HealthGenic decided to prioritize controls related to organizational structure, including segregation of duties, job rotations, job descriptions, and approval processes.
In response to the consequences of the service interruptions, the software development company revamped its infrastructure by adopting a scalable architecture hosted on a cloud platform, enabling dynamic resource allocation based on demand. Rigorous load testing and performance optimization were conducted to identify and address potential bottlenecks, ensuring the system could handle increased user loads seamlessly. Additionally, the company promptly assessed the unauthorized access and data alterations.
To ensure that all employees, including interns, are aware of the importance of data security and the proper handling of patient information, HealthGenic included controls tailored to specifically address employee training, management reviews, and internal audits. Additionally, given the sensitivity of patient data, HealthGenic implemented strict confidentiality measures, including robust authentication methods, such as multi-factor authentication.
In response to the challenges faced by HealthGenic, the organization recognized the vital importance of ensuring a secure cloud computing environment. It initiated a comprehensive self-assessment specifically tailored to evaluate and enhance the security of its cloud infrastructure and practices.
Based on scenario 1, has HealthGenic implemented physical access controls?
Scenario 7: InfoSec is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. After facing numerous information security incidents, InfoSec has decided to establish teams and implement measures to prevent potential incidents in the future
Emma, Bob. and Anna were hired as the new members of InfoSec's information security team, which consists of a security architecture team, an incident response team (IRT) and a forensics team Emma's job is to create information security plans, policies, protocols, and training to prepare InfoSec to respond to incidents effectively Emma and Bob would be full-time employees of InfoSec, whereas Anna was contracted as an external consultant.
Bob, a network expert, will deploy a screened subnet network architecture This architecture will isolate the demilitarized zone (OMZ) to which hosted public services are attached and InfoSec's publicly accessible resources from their private network Thus, InfoSec will be able to block potential attackers from causing unwanted events inside the company's network. Bob is also responsible for ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect.
Anna will create records of the data, reviews, analysis, and reports in order to keep evidence for the purpose of disciplinary and legal action, and use them to prevent future incidents. To do the work accordingly, she should be aware of the company's information security incident management policy beforehand
Among others, this policy specifies the type of records to be created, the place where they should be kept, and the format and content that specific record types should have.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
Based on his tasks, which team is Bob part of?
Based on his tasks, Bob is part of the incident response team (IRT) of InfoSec.According to ISO/IEC 27035-2:2023, the IRT is a team of appropriately skilled and trusted members of an organization that responds to and resolves incidents in a coordinated way1.One of the tasks of the IRT is to conduct an evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect1. This is consistent with Bob's responsibility of ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted. Therefore, Bob belongs to the incident response team.
ISO/IEC 27035-2:2023 (en), Information technology --- Information security incident management --- Part 2: Guidelines to plan and prepare for incident response1
Response to Information Security Incidents | ISMS.online2
Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly
Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What caused SunDee's workforce disruption?
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2013, clause 9.1, an organization must monitor, measure, analyze and evaluate its information security performance and effectiveness.This includes determining what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for doing so, when and by whom the monitoring and measurement shall be performed, when the results shall be analyzed and evaluated, and who shall be responsible for ensuring that the actions arising from the analysis and evaluation are taken1.
SunDee failed to comply with this requirement and did not monitor or measure the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS for the past two years. As a result, the company did not have any objective evidence or indicators to demonstrate the achievement of its information security objectives, the effectiveness of its controls, the satisfaction of its interested parties, or the identification and treatment of its risks.This also meant that the company did not conduct regular management reviews of its ISMS, as required by clause 9.3, which would provide an opportunity for the top management to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the ISMS, and to decide on any changes or improvements needed1.
Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit, as required by clause 9.2, which is a systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled1. However, the company did not have a well-defined audit program, scope, criteria, or methodology, and relied on the written reports of its staff for the past two years. This caused a disruption in the workforce, as most of the staff had to compile their reports for their departments, leaving the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock. Moreover, the internal audit process was very inconsistent, as the reports were written by different employees with different styles, formats, and levels of detail. The internal audit process also lacked any qualitative measures, such as performance indicators, metrics, or benchmarks, to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS.
Therefore, the cause of SunDee's workforce disruption was the negligence of performance evaluation and monitoring and measurement procedures, which led to a lack of objective evidence, a poorly planned and executed internal audit, and a decrease in the company's productivity and stock value.
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Information technology -- Security techniques -- Information security management systems -- Requirements
Scenario 2: Beauty is a cosmetics company that has recently switched to an e-commerce model, leaving the traditional retail. The top management has decided to build their own custom platform in-house and outsource the payment process to an external provider operating online payments systems that support online money transfers.
Due to this transformation of the business model, a number of security controls were implemented based on the identified threats and vulnerabilities associated to critical assets. To protect customers' information. Beauty's employees had to sign a confidentiality agreement. In addition, the company reviewed all user access rights so that only authorized personnel can have access to sensitive files and drafted a new segregation of duties chart.
However, the transition was difficult for the IT team, who had to deal with a security incident not long after transitioning to the e commerce model. After investigating the incident, the team concluded that due to the out-of-date anti-malware software, an attacker gamed access to their files and exposed customers' information, including their names and home addresses.
The IT team decided to stop using the old anti-malware software and install a new one which would automatically remove malicious code in case of similar incidents. The new software was installed in every workstation within the company. After installing the new software, the team updated it with the latest malware definitions and enabled the automatic update feature to keep it up to date at all times. Additionally, they established an authentication process that requires a user identification and password when accessing sensitive information.
In addition, Beauty conducted a number of information security awareness sessions for the IT team and other employees that have access to confidential information in order to raise awareness on the importance of system and network security.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which situation described in scenario 2 Indicates service unavailability?
Scenario 9: OpenTech provides IT and communications services. It helps data communication enterprises and network operators become multi-service providers During an internal audit, its internal auditor, Tim, has identified nonconformities related to the monitoring procedures He identified and evaluated several system Invulnerabilities.
Tim found out that user IDs for systems and services that process sensitive information have been reused and the access control policy has not been followed After analyzing the root causes of this nonconformity, the ISMS project manager developed a list of possible actions to resolve the nonconformity. Then, the ISMS project manager analyzed the list and selected the activities that would allow the elimination of the root cause and the prevention of a similar situation in the future. These activities were included in an action plan The action plan, approved by the top management, was written as follows:
A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department
The approved action plan was implemented and all actions described in the plan were documented.
Based on scenario 9. did the ISMS project manager complete the corrective action process appropriately?
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, the corrective action process consists of the following steps12:
Reacting to the nonconformity and, as applicable, taking action to control and correct it and deal with the consequences
Evaluating the need for action to eliminate the root cause(s) of the nonconformity, in order that it does not recur or occur elsewhere
Implementing the action needed
Reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken
Making changes to the information security management system, if necessary
In scenario 9, the ISMS project manager did not complete the last step of reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken. This step is important to verify that the corrective action has achieved the intended results and that no adverse effects have been introduced.The review can be done by using various methods, such as audits, tests, inspections, or performance indicators3. Therefore, the ISMS project manager did not complete the corrective action process appropriately.
1:ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.22:Procedure for Corrective Action [ISO 27001 templates]3:ISO 27001 Clause 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
- Select Question Types you want
- Set your Desired Pass Percentage
- Allocate Time (Hours : Minutes)
- Create Multiple Practice tests with Limited Questions
- Customer Support
Rachel Carter
8 days agoNancy Torres
17 days agoJeffrey Williams
1 month agoBrian Morris
2 months agoMichael Green
2 months agoStephen Nelson
3 months agoLinda Bell
2 months agoSteven Nelson
2 months agoSharon Green
2 months agoJennifer Wilson
2 months agoLevi
3 months agoProvidencia
3 months agoAmie
4 months agoDarrin
4 months agoSabine
4 months agoBettyann
4 months agoLaticia
5 months agoLeigha
5 months agoGlendora
5 months agoArletta
5 months agoKallie
6 months agoBettina
6 months agoGwenn
6 months agoGilberto
6 months agoAntione
7 months agoTijuana
7 months agoDwight
7 months agoDelbert
7 months agoJohanna
8 months agoTamekia
8 months agoMarvel
8 months agoFloyd
8 months agoLaticia
9 months agoErinn
9 months agoRebbecca
9 months agoCorrinne
9 months agoTrina
10 months agoTonja
10 months agoLino
10 months agoRex
10 months agoLili
10 months agoRosenda
10 months agoBrock
12 months agoClarence
1 year agoArgelia
1 year agoAriel
1 year agoMeghann
1 year agoKati
1 year agoMarion
1 year agoCharolette
1 year agoCarisa
1 year agoSalome
1 year agoFrancoise
1 year agoKimberely
1 year agoMelinda
1 year agoWeldon
1 year agoTheodora
1 year agoChun
1 year agoShannan
2 years agoAlayna
2 years agoJina
2 years agoKing
2 years agoAngella
2 years agoXochitl
2 years agoReita
2 years agoDominga
2 years agoBernardine
2 years agoMarnie
2 years agoLai
2 years agoStefanie
2 years agoCarol
2 years agoBrandee
2 years agoCathrine
2 years agoBarabara
2 years agoMary
2 years agoLuisa
2 years agoFiliberto
2 years agoAndra
2 years agoCiara
2 years agoSantos
2 years agoCelestina
2 years agoAlayna
2 years agoRosio
2 years agoPauline
2 years agoCassie
2 years agoAnnice
2 years agoSherell
2 years agoDan
2 years agoDorothy
2 years ago