Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Questions
- PECB Continuing Professional Development CPD Certifications
- PECB Implementer Certifications
- PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Implementer Certifications
- Topic 1: Fundamental principles and concepts of an information security management system: This topic covers information security basics, emphasizing confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA), along with the importance of risk management in establishing a robust Information Security Management System (ISMS).
- Topic 2: Information security management system requirements: This topic explores ISO/IEC 27001's detailed requirements, including its structure and terminology. Moreover, the topic also highlights compliance with legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations essential for effective information security management.
- Topic 3: Planning of an ISMS implementation based on ISO/IEC 27001: It involves conducting a gap analysis, setting ISMS objectives, identifying risks and opportunities, and developing a Statement of Applicability (SoA) to guide implementation efforts effectively.
- Topic 4: Implementation of an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001: The topic focuses on establishing policies, procedures, and controls, and managing resources. The sections also delve into conducting training programs for staff awareness and ensuring proper documentation to meet compliance requirements.
- Topic 5: Monitoring and measurement of an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001: This area discusses performance evaluation methods, the significance of internal audits, and the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to assess the effectiveness of the ISMS continuously.
- Topic 6: Continual improvement of an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001: This topic emphasizes processes for ongoing improvement based on feedback and audits, implementing corrective actions, preventive measures, and conducting management reviews to enhance the ISMS continually.
Free PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Actual Questions
Note: Premium Questions for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer were last updated On Oct. 03, 2026 (see below)
Once they made sure that the attackers do not have access in their system, the security administrators decided to proceed with the forensic analysis. They concluded that their access security system was not designed tor threat detection, including the detection of malicious files which could be the cause of possible future attacks.
Based on these findings. Texas H$H inc, decided to modify its access security system to avoid future incidents and integrate an incident management policy in their Information security policy that could serve as guidance for employees on how to respond to similar incidents.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which situation described in scenario 7 Indicates that Texas H&H Inc. implemented a detective control?
An organization has adopted a new authentication method to ensure secure access to sensitive areas and facilities of the company. It requires every employee to use a two-factor authentication (password and QR code). This control has been documented, standardized, and communicated to all employees, however its use has been "left to individual initiative, and it is likely that failures can be detected. Which level of maturity does this control refer to?
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer objectives and content, the maturity levels of information security controls are based on the ISO/IEC 15504 standard, which defines five levels of process capability: incomplete, performed, managed, established, and optimized1. Each level has a set of attributes that describe the characteristics of the process at that level.The level of defined corresponds to the attribute of process performance, which means that the process achieves its expected outcomes2. In this case, the control of two-factor authentication has been documented, standardized, and communicated, which implies that it has a clear purpose and expected outcomes. However, the control is not consistently implemented, monitored, or measured, which means that it does not meet the attributes of the higher levels of managed, established, or optimized. Therefore, the control is at the level of defined, which is the second level of maturity.
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer Course Brochure, page 5
2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer Course Presentation, slide 25
Scenario 9: CoreBit Systems
CoreBit Systems, with its headquarters m San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions, its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients a smooth transition into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.
Recently. John, the internal auditor of CoreBit Systems, conducted an internal audit which uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities, in response to the identified nonconformities. CoreBit Systems decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to solve these issues systematically. The method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of issues. This approach involves several steps. First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.
Following the analysis of the root cause of the nonconformities, CoreBit Systems's ISMS project manager. Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity. While assessing potential corrective action for addressing a nonconformity, Julia identified the issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its reoccurrence Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Afterward. Julia combined all the nonconformities Into a single action plan and sought approval from the top management.
The submitted action plan was written as follows:
A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department.
However. Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process, and notably, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.
Julia, the ISMS project manager, developed a combined action plan for all nonconformities. However, it was rejected, revised, and resubmitted late---without defined execution schedules.
Did CoreBit Systems have a plan in place to implement permanent corrective action to address the identified nonconformities?
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 10.2 -- Nonconformity and corrective action requires:
''Corrective actions shall be implemented without undue delay and include:
--- evaluating the need for action to eliminate the cause;
--- implementing the necessary actions;
--- reviewing the effectiveness;
--- updating risks and SoA if needed.''
Although Julia drafted an action plan, it was not approved initially, was resubmitted late, and lacked scheduling---failing to meet key requirements of a ''clear and actionable plan.''
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 10.2===========
Scenario 1:
HealthGenic is a leading multi-specialty healthcare organization providing patients with comprehensive medical services in Toronto, Canad
a. The organization relies heavily on a web-based medical software platform to monitor patient health, schedule appointments, generate customized medical reports, securely store patient data, and facilitate seamless communication among various stakeholders, including patients, physicians, and medical laboratory staff.
As the organization expanded its services and demand grew, frequent and prolonged service interruptions became more common, causing significant disruptions to patient care and administrative processes. As such, HealthGenic initiated a comprehensive risk analysis to assess the severity of risks it faced.
When comparing the risk analysis results with its risk criteria to determine whether the risk and its significance were acceptable or tolerable, HealthGenic noticed a critical gap in its capacity planning and infrastructure resilience. Recognizing the urgency of this issue, HealthGenic reached out to the software development company responsible for its platform. Utilizing its expertise in healthcare technology, data management, and compliance regulations, the software development company successfully resolved the service interruptions.
However, HealthGenic also uncovered unauthorized changes to user access controls. Consequently, some medical reports were altered, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate medical records. The company swiftly acknowledged and corrected the unintentional changes to user access controls. When analyzing the root cause of these changes, HealthGenic identified a vulnerability related to the segregation of duties within the IT department, which allowed individuals with system administration access also to manage user access controls. Therefore, HealthGenic decided to prioritize controls related to organizational structure, including segregation of duties, job rotations, job descriptions, and approval processes.
In response to the consequences of the service interruptions, the software development company revamped its infrastructure by adopting a scalable architecture hosted on a cloud platform, enabling dynamic resource allocation based on demand. Rigorous load testing and performance optimization were conducted to identify and address potential bottlenecks, ensuring the system could handle increased user loads seamlessly. Additionally, the company promptly assessed the unauthorized access and data alterations.
To ensure that all employees, including interns, are aware of the importance of data security and the proper handling of patient information, HealthGenic included controls tailored to specifically address employee training, management reviews, and internal audits. Additionally, given the sensitivity of patient data, HealthGenic implemented strict confidentiality measures, including robust authentication methods, such as multi-factor authentication.
In response to the challenges faced by HealthGenic, the organization recognized the vital importance of ensuring a secure cloud computing environment. It initiated a comprehensive self-assessment specifically tailored to evaluate and enhance the security of its cloud infrastructure and practices.
Based on scenario 1, has HealthGenic implemented physical access controls?
Scenario 7: InfoSec is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. After facing numerous information security incidents, InfoSec has decided to establish teams and implement measures to prevent potential incidents in the future
Emma, Bob. and Anna were hired as the new members of InfoSec's information security team, which consists of a security architecture team, an incident response team (IRT) and a forensics team Emma's job is to create information security plans, policies, protocols, and training to prepare InfoSec to respond to incidents effectively Emma and Bob would be full-time employees of InfoSec, whereas Anna was contracted as an external consultant.
Bob, a network expert, will deploy a screened subnet network architecture This architecture will isolate the demilitarized zone (OMZ) to which hosted public services are attached and InfoSec's publicly accessible resources from their private network Thus, InfoSec will be able to block potential attackers from causing unwanted events inside the company's network. Bob is also responsible for ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect.
Anna will create records of the data, reviews, analysis, and reports in order to keep evidence for the purpose of disciplinary and legal action, and use them to prevent future incidents. To do the work accordingly, she should be aware of the company's information security incident management policy beforehand
Among others, this policy specifies the type of records to be created, the place where they should be kept, and the format and content that specific record types should have.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
Based on his tasks, which team is Bob part of?
Based on his tasks, Bob is part of the incident response team (IRT) of InfoSec.According to ISO/IEC 27035-2:2023, the IRT is a team of appropriately skilled and trusted members of an organization that responds to and resolves incidents in a coordinated way1.One of the tasks of the IRT is to conduct an evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect1. This is consistent with Bob's responsibility of ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted. Therefore, Bob belongs to the incident response team.
ISO/IEC 27035-2:2023 (en), Information technology --- Information security incident management --- Part 2: Guidelines to plan and prepare for incident response1
Response to Information Security Incidents | ISMS.online2
- Select Question Types you want
- Set your Desired Pass Percentage
- Allocate Time (Hours : Minutes)
- Create Multiple Practice tests with Limited Questions
- Customer Support
Karen Morgan
22 days agoSharon Howard
1 month agoOlivia Phillips
2 months agoSusan Howard
2 months agoAndrew Nguyen
3 months agoRachel Carter
3 months agoNancy Torres
4 months agoJeffrey Williams
5 months agoBrian Morris
5 months agoMichael Green
5 months agoStephen Nelson
6 months agoLinda Bell
6 months agoSteven Nelson
5 months agoSharon Green
5 months agoJennifer Wilson
5 months agoLevi
6 months agoProvidencia
7 months agoAmie
7 months agoDarrin
7 months agoSabine
7 months agoBettyann
8 months agoLaticia
8 months agoLeigha
8 months agoGlendora
8 months agoArletta
9 months agoKallie
9 months agoBettina
9 months agoGwenn
9 months agoGilberto
10 months agoAntione
10 months agoTijuana
10 months agoDwight
10 months agoDelbert
11 months agoJohanna
11 months agoTamekia
11 months agoMarvel
11 months agoFloyd
12 months agoLaticia
12 months agoErinn
1 year agoRebbecca
1 year agoCorrinne
1 year agoTrina
1 year agoTonja
1 year agoLino
1 year agoRex
1 year agoLili
1 year agoRosenda
1 year agoBrock
1 year agoClarence
1 year agoArgelia
1 year agoAriel
1 year agoMeghann
1 year agoKati
1 year agoMarion
2 years agoCharolette
2 years agoCarisa
2 years agoSalome
2 years agoFrancoise
2 years agoKimberely
2 years agoMelinda
2 years agoWeldon
2 years agoTheodora
2 years agoChun
2 years agoShannan
2 years agoAlayna
2 years agoJina
2 years agoKing
2 years agoAngella
2 years agoXochitl
2 years agoReita
2 years agoDominga
2 years agoBernardine
2 years agoMarnie
2 years agoLai
2 years agoStefanie
2 years agoCarol
2 years agoBrandee
2 years agoCathrine
2 years agoBarabara
2 years agoMary
2 years agoLuisa
2 years agoFiliberto
2 years agoAndra
2 years agoCiara
2 years agoSantos
2 years agoCelestina
2 years agoAlayna
2 years agoRosio
2 years agoPauline
2 years agoCassie
2 years agoAnnice
2 years agoSherell
2 years agoDan
2 years agoDorothy
3 years ago