Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam - Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 2
[All ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions]

Scenario 4: TradeB is a newly established commercial bank located in Europe, with a diverse clientele. It provides services that encompass retail banking, corporate banking, wealth management, and digital banking, all tailored to meet the evolving financial needs of individuals and businesses in the region. Recognizing the critical importance of information security in the modern banking landscape, TradeB has initiated the implementation of an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. To ensure the successful implementation of the ISMS, the top management decided to contract two experts to lead and oversee the ISMS implementation project.

As a primary strategy for implementing the ISMS, the experts chose an approach that emphasizes a swift implementation of the ISMS by initially meeting the minimum requirements of ISO/IEC 27001, followed by continual improvement over time. Additionally, under the guidance of the experts, TradeB opted for a methodological framework, which serves as a structured framework and a guideline that outlines the high-level stages of the ISMS implementation, the associated activities, and the deliverables without incorporating any specific tools.

The experts analyzed the ISO/IEC 27001 controls and listed only the security controls deemed applicable to the company and its objectives. Based on this analysis, they drafted the Statement of Applicability. Afterward, they conducted a risk assessment, during which they identified assets, such as hardware, software, and networks, as well as threats and vulnerabilities, assessed potential consequences and likelihood, and determined the level of risks based on a methodical approach that involved defining and characterizing the terms and criteria used in the assessment process, categorizing them into non-numerical levels (e.g., very low, low, moderate, high, very high). Explanatory notes were thoughtfully crafted to justify assessed values, with the primary goal of enhancing repeatability and reproducibility.

Then, they evaluated the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria, where they decided to treat only the risks of the high-risk category. Additionally, they focused primarily on the unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures. To address these issues, they established a new version of the access control policy, implemented controls to manage and control user access, and introduced a control for ICT readiness to ensure business continuity.

Their risk assessment report indicated that if the implemented security controls reduce the risk levels to an acceptable threshold, those risks will be accepted.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Which of the actions presented in scenario 4 is NOT compliant with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lindsay
5 months ago
Wait, are they really only treating high-risk categories? Seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
5 months ago
Totally agree, that's not how it should be done!
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
6 months ago
Nope, that's not compliant with ISO/IEC 27001 standards!
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
6 months ago
Selecting only applicable controls is fine, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
6 months ago
TradeB drafted the Statement of Applicability before the risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
6 months ago
I feel like drafting the Statement of Applicability before the risk assessment could lead to gaps, so option B seems like the right answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I recall that selecting applicable controls is part of the process, so I don't think option A is the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think it's common to focus on high-risk categories in risk treatment. So, option C could be compliant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
7 months ago
I remember that the Statement of Applicability should be based on the risk assessment findings, so I think option B might be the non-compliant action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. One of the actions presented is not in line with the standard's requirements. I'll select the option that best reflects that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
7 months ago
Hmm, the experts seem to have followed a structured approach, but I'm not sure if all the steps are fully compliant with ISO/IEC 27001. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
8 months ago
The scenario provides a lot of details, so I think I can identify the non-compliant action based on my understanding of the standard. I'll carefully review each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
8 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001 correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 year ago
Yes, I also think that option B is not compliant with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. The risk assessment should come before drafting the Statement of Applicability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
1 year ago
I believe option B is the correct answer because the Statement of Applicability should be based on the results of the risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 year ago
Haha, 'ICT readiness to ensure business continuity'? Sounds like they're trying to cover all their bases, even the ones that don't really need covering.
upvoted 0 times
Essie
12 months ago
Luis: Definitely, especially with the increasing cyber threats these days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
12 months ago
User 3: I agree, better safe than sorry when it comes to protecting sensitive financial information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
12 months ago
User 2: User access control and business continuity are crucial in banking. They're just being thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
12 months ago
User 1: ICT readiness, huh? Seems like they're going all out with their security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
12 months ago
User 4: Well, it's always good to be prepared for any scenario, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
12 months ago
User 3: I think they're being thorough, but maybe they're overdoing it a bit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, seems like they're going all out with their security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
1 year ago
User 1: ICT readiness, huh? Better safe than sorry, I guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearlene
1 year ago
Drafting the Statement of Applicability before the risk assessment? That's like trying to put the cart before the horse. Definitely not the way to go about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
I agree with you, Aliza. It's important to conduct the risk assessment before drafting the Statement of Applicability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
1 year ago
Selecting only the applicable controls makes sense, but I'm not sure if that's the 'non-compliant' action here. Seems like a reasonable approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
1 year ago
C) TradeB decided to treat only the risks of the high-risk category
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
1 year ago
B) TradeB drafted the Statement of Applicability before conducting the risk assessment
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
1 year ago
A) TradeB selected only ISO/IEC 27001 controls deemed applicable to the company
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aliza
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) TradeB drafted the Statement of Applicability before conducting the risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
Focusing only on the high-risk category seems a bit shortsighted. Wouldn't it be better to address all the risks, even if they're not in the high-risk category?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the Statement of Applicability should be drafted after the risk assessment, not before. That's a bit backwards, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Larae
1 year ago
Vallie: Definitely, it's important to have a clear understanding of the risks before determining which controls are applicable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it does seem a bit counterintuitive to draft it before assessing the risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, the Statement of Applicability should be drafted after the risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel