Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 4 Question 22 Discussion

Posted by Vernell on Sep 16, 2024 at 09:37 PM

Read the following role descriptions. Select two roles that are not directly involved in the audit process.

Suggested Answer: D, E

Get Premium ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
JO
Johanna 10 months ago
I think a guide might still have some auditing responsibilities.
DO
Donte 11 months ago
An observer is also not directly involved, right?
BR
Britt 11 months ago
Wait, an interpreter witnesses the audit? That’s surprising!
KE
Kerry 11 months ago
Totally agree, those roles are outside the audit process!
KY
Kyoko 11 months ago
A technical expert and an interpreter are not auditors.
TA
Tammy 12 months ago
I feel confident about choosing the technical expert and the interpreter, but I keep second-guessing if the observer could be considered part of the process.
MA
Maryanne 12 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to identify roles in an audit, and I think the guide is also not directly involved in the audit itself.
GE
Gertude 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about the observer though. They might not be involved in the audit process either, but I feel like they could still play a role.
JO
Jody 1 year ago
I think the technical expert and the interpreter might be the right choices since they don't directly conduct the audit.
TH
Thad 1 year ago
I think the interpreter and the observer are the two roles that are not directly involved in the audit process. The other roles seem to be more hands-on with the actual audit. I'll double-check my answer, but I feel good about it.
AD
Adelina 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The roles seem pretty similar, and I'm not entirely sure which ones are not directly involved. I'll need to re-read the descriptions carefully.
LE
Levi 1 year ago
Okay, I've got it! The interpreter and the observer are the two roles that are not directly involved in the audit process. I'm confident in my answer.
HI
Hildegarde 1 year ago
Hmm, let me think about this. The auditor-in-training, technical expert, audit team leader, and guide all seem to be directly involved. I'll need to carefully consider the other two options.
DI
Dierdre 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll need to identify the two roles that are not directly involved in the audit process.
EM
Emerson 1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The answer is clearly A - the available tools to block tracking would break most sites' functionality. That makes sense, since first-party tracking is so integral to how websites operate.
GE
Georgiana 2 years ago
Haha, I bet the interpreter is there to translate all the auditor's terrible jokes for the auditee. Anyway, I think the guide and the observer are the ones not directly involved.
GA
Gary 2 years ago
I'm going to say the technical expert and the interpreter. Those roles seem more like support positions rather than the main audit team.
FE
Felicia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gary
Yes, the observer and guide are more like overseeing and assisting roles.
JA
Janna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gary
I think the observer and guide are also not directly involved in the audit process.
LA
Lavonne 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gary
I agree, the technical expert and interpreter are definitely support roles.
FR
Freida 2 years ago
Hmm, the auditor-in-training and the observer are the ones that stand out to me as not being directly involved. I hope I'm right!
PA
Paris 2 years ago
↳ replying to Freida
Yes, the auditor-in-training just observes and learns, while the observer simply watches the audit.
AM
Amie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Freida
That makes sense, they are more on the sidelines compared to the other roles listed.
CA
Carlota 2 years ago
↳ replying to Freida
I think you're right, the auditor-in-training and the observer are not directly involved in the audit process.
YO
Youlanda 2 years ago
I think the technical expert could also be considered not directly involved in the audit process, as they provide expertise but are not auditors.
DO
Dominic 2 years ago
The observer and the guide seem like they're not really part of the core audit team, so I'll go with those two.
LA
Laquita 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dominic
Having a guide appointed by the auditee can help facilitate the audit process smoothly.
LE
Lemuel 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dominic
The observer can provide valuable feedback on the performance of the audit team.
AN
Angelyn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dominic
It makes sense to choose those two roles as not directly involved in the audit.
TO
Tomoko 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dominic
I agree, the observer and guide roles are more on the periphery of the audit process.
VE
Vernell 2 years ago
I agree with you, Laticia. The interpreter helps with language issues, and the guide assists the audit team, but they are not part of the audit process itself.
LA
Laticia 2 years ago
I think the roles that are not directly involved in the audit process are the interpreter and the guide.
AS
Ashley 2 years ago
I think the roles that are not directly involved in the audit process are the technical expert and the interpreter.
LA
Lamonica 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ashley
Yes, they are there to provide support or assistance, but they are not actively participating in the audit itself.
KA
Karan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ashley
That makes sense, the observer and the guide are more like spectators in the audit.
RO
Romana 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ashley
I think the observer and the guide are also not directly involved in the audit process.
FL
Fletcher 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ashley
I agree, the technical expert and the interpreter are not directly involved in the audit process.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel