I feel confident about choosing the technical expert and the interpreter, but I keep second-guessing if the observer could be considered part of the process.
I think the interpreter and the observer are the two roles that are not directly involved in the audit process. The other roles seem to be more hands-on with the actual audit. I'll double-check my answer, but I feel good about it.
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The roles seem pretty similar, and I'm not entirely sure which ones are not directly involved. I'll need to re-read the descriptions carefully.
Hmm, let me think about this. The auditor-in-training, technical expert, audit team leader, and guide all seem to be directly involved. I'll need to carefully consider the other two options.
I feel pretty confident about this one. The answer is clearly A - the available tools to block tracking would break most sites' functionality. That makes sense, since first-party tracking is so integral to how websites operate.
Haha, I bet the interpreter is there to translate all the auditor's terrible jokes for the auditee. Anyway, I think the guide and the observer are the ones not directly involved.
I agree with you, Laticia. The interpreter helps with language issues, and the guide assists the audit team, but they are not part of the audit process itself.
Johanna
3 months agoDonte
3 months agoBritt
3 months agoKerry
4 months agoKyoko
4 months agoTammy
4 months agoMaryanne
4 months agoGertude
4 months agoJody
5 months agoThad
5 months agoAdelina
5 months agoLevi
5 months agoHildegarde
5 months agoDierdre
5 months agoEmerson
5 months agoGeorgiana
1 year agoGary
1 year agoFelicia
1 year agoJanna
1 year agoLavonne
1 year agoFreida
1 year agoParis
1 year agoAmie
1 year agoCarlota
1 year agoYoulanda
1 year agoDominic
1 year agoLaquita
1 year agoLemuel
1 year agoAngelyn
1 year agoTomoko
1 year agoVernell
1 year agoLaticia
1 year agoAshley
1 year agoLamonica
1 year agoKaran
1 year agoRomana
1 year agoFletcher
1 year ago