I feel confident about choosing the technical expert and the interpreter, but I keep second-guessing if the observer could be considered part of the process.
I think the interpreter and the observer are the two roles that are not directly involved in the audit process. The other roles seem to be more hands-on with the actual audit. I'll double-check my answer, but I feel good about it.
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The roles seem pretty similar, and I'm not entirely sure which ones are not directly involved. I'll need to re-read the descriptions carefully.
Hmm, let me think about this. The auditor-in-training, technical expert, audit team leader, and guide all seem to be directly involved. I'll need to carefully consider the other two options.
I feel pretty confident about this one. The answer is clearly A - the available tools to block tracking would break most sites' functionality. That makes sense, since first-party tracking is so integral to how websites operate.
Haha, I bet the interpreter is there to translate all the auditor's terrible jokes for the auditee. Anyway, I think the guide and the observer are the ones not directly involved.
I agree with you, Laticia. The interpreter helps with language issues, and the guide assists the audit team, but they are not part of the audit process itself.
Johanna
6 months agoDonte
6 months agoBritt
6 months agoKerry
7 months agoKyoko
7 months agoTammy
7 months agoMaryanne
7 months agoGertude
7 months agoJody
8 months agoThad
8 months agoAdelina
8 months agoLevi
8 months agoHildegarde
8 months agoDierdre
8 months agoEmerson
8 months agoGeorgiana
2 years agoGary
2 years agoFelicia
2 years agoJanna
2 years agoLavonne
2 years agoFreida
2 years agoParis
2 years agoAmie
2 years agoCarlota
2 years agoYoulanda
2 years agoDominic
2 years agoLaquita
2 years agoLemuel
2 years agoAngelyn
2 years agoTomoko
2 years agoVernell
2 years agoLaticia
2 years agoAshley
2 years agoLamonica
2 years agoKaran
2 years agoRomana
2 years agoFletcher
2 years ago