Discuss PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Topic 1 Question 21

During a Stage 1 audit, the Quality Manager asks that the audit includes coverage of a new work area they have expanded into since the application was made.

Which of the following two actions should the auditor take?

AAdvise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures.

BAdvise the Quality Manager that the audit scope has been set and the audit will proceed as planned.

CAdvise the Quality Manager that, within the existing scope, the new work area can be included without any problem.

DDetermine whether the Quality Management System covers the new work area and, if so, proceed with the audit.

ESuggest that she will advise the programme manager that the audit scope should be revised to include the new work area.
Suggest that the Quality Manager cancels the audit contract and reapplies for the new situation.

Suggested Answer: A, E

Question no: 14 Verified Answer: =

A) Advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures. and E. Suggest that she will advise the programme manager that the audit scope should be revised to include the new work area. Comprehensive But Short = A Stage 1 audit is a preliminary assessment to evaluate the readiness of the organisation for the Stage 2 certification audit. The audit scope is defined by the audit client and the certification body based on the application and the contract. If the organisation wants to include a new work area that was not part of the original scope, the auditor should advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures, such as submitting a formal request, providing relevant information, and paying additional fees. The auditor should also suggest that the Quality Manager will advise the programme manager, who is responsible for managing the audit programme, that the audit scope should be revised to include the new work area. The programme manager will then decide whether to approve or reject the request, and communicate the decision to the auditor and the Quality Manager. The auditor should not proceed with the audit of the new work area without the approval of the programme manager and the confirmation of the audit scope. 1234 Reference:

1: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

2: ISO 9001 Certification Audits | Stage 1 and Stage 2 - 9001. Simplified

3: What is the difference between Stage 1 and Stage 2 Audits? - ISO Update

4: Getting Certified to ISO 9001 - the Stage 1 Audit

Get Premium ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

36 comments · newest first

Lera 10 months ago

E seems extreme, why cancel the whole audit?

Lera 11 months ago

D sounds good too, if the system covers it, why not?

Tonja 11 months ago

Wait, can they really just add a new area like that? Seems risky.

Stephaine 11 months ago

Totally agree, can't just change the scope on a whim.

Roslyn 11 months ago

A is the right move, gotta follow the procedures!

Huey 12 months ago

I recall something about needing to communicate changes to the audit scope properly, but I'm not confident if that means suggesting a complete cancellation like in option E.

Justine 12 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where the auditor had to assess if the new area was covered by the existing management system. That makes me lean towards option D.

Justine 12 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the audit should stick to the original scope unless there's a strong reason to change it. Maybe option B?

Dorinda 1 year ago

I remember we discussed how important it is to follow established procedures for scope changes during audits. So, I think option A might be the right choice.

Alex 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused here. Option D seems like it could be a good approach, but I'll need to double-check the details of the Quality Management System to make sure it covers the new work area.

Francisca 1 year ago

This is straightforward. The audit scope has been set, so I'd go with option B and advise the Quality Manager that the audit will proceed as planned.

Selma 1 year ago

Okay, I've got a strategy in mind. I think option A is the way to go - advise the Quality Manager about the procedures for extending the scope, and work with them to get that done properly.

Lashawna 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to make sure I understand the established procedures for scope extensions before deciding on the best course of action.

Solange 1 year ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the implications of each approach.

Flo 1 year ago

I'm a little confused by the options. I'll need to make sure I understand what each field represents in the Windows event logs before I can confidently select an answer.

Leonora 2 years ago

Haha, Option E is a classic move - 'let's reapply for the whole thing!' Nice try, Quality Manager, but the auditor's not falling for that one.

Mattie 2 years ago

↳ replying to Leonora

Haha, Option E is a classic move - 'let's reapply for the whole thing!' Nice try, Quality Manager, but the auditor's not falling for that one.

Jina 2 years ago

↳ replying to Leonora

D) Determine whether the Quality Management System covers the new work area and, if so, proceed with the audit.

Pura 2 years ago

↳ replying to Leonora

A) Advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures.

Una 2 years ago

Wait, did you say a new work area? Sounds like the Quality Manager is trying to sneak in some extra work! Option B all the way - stick to the original scope.

Lavonna 2 years ago

↳ replying to Una

True, it's important to ensure all relevant areas are included in the audit.

Mariann 2 years ago

↳ replying to Una

In that case, the auditor should determine if it's covered and proceed accordingly.

Luz 2 years ago

↳ replying to Una

But what if the new work area is crucial for the Quality Management System?

Alease 2 years ago

↳ replying to Una

I agree, sticking to the original scope is important for the audit.

Donette 2 years ago

I think the auditor should determine if the Quality Management System covers the new work area before proceeding with the audit.

Linwood 2 years ago

I'm leaning towards Option A. Gotta follow the established procedures, even if it's a bit of a hassle. Audits are all about the rules, you know?

Louann 2 years ago

↳ replying to Linwood

E) Suggest that she will advise the programme manager that the audit scope should be revised to include the new work area.

Benton 2 years ago

↳ replying to Linwood

D) Determine whether the Quality Management System covers the new work area and, if so, proceed with the audit.

Lillian 2 years ago

↳ replying to Linwood

A) Advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures.

Georgene 2 years ago

I agree with Tabetha. It's important to follow established procedures for any changes in the audit scope.

Linette 2 years ago

Option D is the way to go. Check if the new work area is covered, and if so, proceed with the audit. Simple and straightforward.

Steffanie 2 years ago

↳ replying to Linette

Option D is the way to go. Check if the new work area is covered, and if so, proceed with the audit. Simple and straightforward.

Brianne 2 years ago

↳ replying to Linette

A) Advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures.

Noel 2 years ago

↳ replying to Linette

E) Suggest that she will advise the programme manager that the audit scope should be revised to include the new work area.

Samira 2 years ago

↳ replying to Linette

D) Determine whether the Quality Management System covers the new work area and, if so, proceed with the audit.

Tabetha 2 years ago

I think the auditor should advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible.

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion