MENU
An administrator has been directed to configure Volumes to Nutanix's best practices for security.
What should the administrate! do to be compliant?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium NCP-US Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The administrator should prevent the Files environment and the AD Server from having such a time difference in future by using the same NTP Servers for the File environment and the AD Server. NTP (Network Time Protocol) is a protocol that synchronizes the clocks of devices on a network with a reliable time source. NTP Servers are devices that provide accurate time information to other devices on a network. By using the same NTP Servers for the File environment and the AD Server, the administrator can ensure that they have consistent and accurate time settings and avoid any synchronization issues or errors.Reference:Nutanix Files Administration Guide, page 32; Nutanix Files Troubleshooting Guide
41 comments · newest first
CA
Carmelina
10 months ago
Wait, are we really supposed to separate iSCSI traffic physically? Sounds extreme!
FE
Felix
11 months ago
Using data services IP is a good practice, for sure!
OD
Odette
11 months ago
I thought segmenting iSCSI traffic was optional?
BE
Berry
11 months ago
CHAP is a must for secure access, no doubt.
TA
Tambra
11 months ago
Definitely enable at-rest encryption on Volume Groups!
MA
Maryln
11 months ago
Using a data services IP for external connectivity sounds familiar, but I wonder if it's the best option compared to the others listed.
DE
Denny
12 months ago
I feel like segmenting iSCSI traffic is important for security, but I can't recall if it's specifically a best practice for Nutanix.
MA
Maryann
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think CHAP is more about authentication rather than encryption. I might need to double-check that.
GO
Goldie
1 year ago
I remember we discussed enabling at-rest encryption as a key security measure for data protection. That seems like a solid choice.
HU
Hubert
1 year ago
I think the key here is to focus on Nutanix's best practices for security. That suggests the answer is likely related to encryption or network segmentation. I'm going to go with option D - segmenting iSCSI traffic to a separate network.
NI
Nidia
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about securing volumes, so I'm guessing the answer has to do with encryption or access control. I'm leaning towards option A, but I'll double-check the other choices just to be sure.
RO
Romana
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with Nutanix volume configuration, so I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully.
ST
Stephane
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about Nutanix best practices for securing volumes. I think the answer is A - enabling at-rest encryption on Volume Groups.
MA
Malcom
1 year ago
Option D, all the way! Separate networks for iSCSI traffic? Sounds like a party, and the bad guys aren't invited.
SH
Shanda
1 year ago
It's important to follow best practices for security, and separating networks for iSCSI traffic is a key step.
RA
Raul
1 year ago
I agree, having separate networks for iSCSI traffic is a great security measure.
GI
Gianna
1 year ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. Separate networks for iSCSI traffic will keep the bad guys out.
KR
Kristofer
1 year ago
Encrypt those volumes, people! Unless you want Nutanix to be able to read your diary entries.
LE
Leslee
1 year ago
Encrypting the volumes will help protect sensitive data.
MA
Martin
1 year ago
Make sure to follow Nutanix's best practices for security.
BR
Brice
1 year ago
Enable encryption on the volumes.
LE
Leatha
1 year ago
C'mon, option C? Using data services IP for external host connectivity? That's like putting your password on a Post-it note. Not a good idea.
TE
Temeka
1 year ago
Let's go with Option A then. It's the safest choice for compliance.
JU
Junita
1 year ago
I agree, Option C is definitely not a good idea for security reasons.
AL
Allene
1 year ago
Option A is the best choice. It ensures secure communication between hosts.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
Option B? Really? CHAP? That's so 2000s. Let's move into the 21st century with at-rest encryption, shall we?
NI
Nickole
1 year ago
Option B is definitely not the best choice for security. At-rest encryption is the way to go.
XU
Xuan
1 year ago
Absolutely, we need to prioritize security with at-rest encryption.
ER
Erinn
1 year ago
I agree, CHAP is outdated. At-rest encryption is much more secure.
EL
Elliot
1 year ago
At-rest encryption is definitely the way to go for security.
VA
Vallie
2 years ago
I think option D is the way to go. Segmenting iSCSI traffic to a physically separate network is a great way to enhance security.
LE
Leeann
1 year ago
By segmenting iSCSI traffic, the administrator can reduce the risk of unauthorized access to the volumes.
CO
Cornell
1 year ago
It's definitely a best practice to keep sensitive traffic separate from other network traffic.
JO
Jolene
1 year ago
I agree, segmenting the traffic to a separate network adds an extra layer of protection.
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
I agree, it's a best practice to keep sensitive data on a separate network.
VI
Viva
1 year ago
Option D is a good choice. It helps to isolate iSCSI traffic for better security.
AL
Alpha
1 year ago
Option D is a good choice. Segregating iSCSI traffic is important for security.
KA
Karl
2 years ago
I believe configuring Volume Groups to use CHAP is also important for security measures.
CA
Carlee
2 years ago
Definitely go with option A. Enabling at-rest encryption on Volume Groups is the best way to ensure the data is secure.
CH
Charolette
2 years ago
I agree with Clay, enabling at-rest encryption is crucial for security compliance.
CL
Clay
2 years ago
I think the administrator should enable at-rest encryption on Volume Groups.