New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope NSK200 Exam - Topic 3 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 3
[All NSK200 Questions]

You are an administrator writing Netskope Real-time Protection policies and must determine proper policy ordering.

Which two statements are true in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

To determine proper policy ordering for Netskope Real-time Protection policies, you need to follow these two statements: B. You do not need to create an ''allow all'' Web Access policy at the bottom. D. You must place high-risk block policies at the top.These statements are based on the best practices for policy ordering recommended by Netskope3. An ''allow all'' Web Access policy at the bottom is not necessary because any traffic that does not match any policy will be allowed by default.However, you can create a ''monitor all'' Web Access policy at the bottom if you want to log all the traffic that is not matched by any other policy4. High-risk block policies at the top are important because they prevent any traffic that poses a serious threat or violates a critical compliance standard from reaching its destination.These policies should have higher priority than other policies that may allow or modify the traffic5. Therefore, options B and D are correct and the other options are incorrect.Reference:Real-time Protection Policies - Netskope Knowledge Portal,Create a Real-time Protection Policy for Web Categories - Netskope Knowledge Portal,Best Practices: Real-time Protection Policies (1 of 2) - Netskope


by Deonna at Sep 15, 2024, 02:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jacklyn
3 months ago
Wait, are we really not creating an 'allow all' policy? That seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
3 months ago
C sounds off, why would DLP be at the bottom?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
3 months ago
A is correct, middle placement for malware policies makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
4 months ago
I think B is misleading, you might still want an 'allow all' policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
4 months ago
D is definitely true, high-risk policies should always be prioritized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
4 months ago
I’m pretty sure DLP policies should be at the bottom, but I might be mixing that up with another topic we covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think placing malware policies in the middle makes sense, but I’m uncertain about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
4 months ago
I feel like we discussed the importance of ordering policies, but I can't recall if the 'allow all' policy is necessary or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
5 months ago
I think I remember that high-risk block policies should definitely go at the top, but I'm not sure about the DLP policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
5 months ago
Alright, I think I've got a good strategy. High-risk block policies at the top, Netskope private access malware policies in the middle, and DLP policies at the bottom. No 'allow all' Web Access policy required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the proper ordering here. I'll need to review the Netskope documentation to make sure I understand the best practices for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
5 months ago
I've got this! The key is to place the Netskope private access malware policies in the middle, and the DLP policies at the bottom. No need for an 'allow all' Web Access policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know the high-risk block policies need to be at the top, but I'm not sure about the other statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the policy ordering to get this right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
1 year ago
Haha, this exam is like a maze of policies! I'm going with B and D. No 'allow all' policy, and the high-risk blocks better be at the top or it's game over. Netskope doesn't mess around!
upvoted 0 times
Teri
1 year ago
I'm not sure about A, but I know for sure that 'allow all' policy is not needed at the bottom.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
1 year ago
I agree, B and D are the way to go. Can't risk missing any high-risk blocks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 year ago
I think C is important too, DLP policies should definitely be at the bottom.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nichelle
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about A. Putting the malware policies in the middle doesn't seem right to me. I'd go with B and D - no 'allow all' and high-risk blocks at the top. Gotta keep that network secure!
upvoted 0 times
Benedict
1 year ago
Definitely, better to be safe than sorry when it comes to network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 year ago
I think skipping the 'allow all' policy makes sense to avoid any unnecessary risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
1 year ago
I agree, having high-risk block policies at the top is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
1 year ago
Yeah, it's important to prioritize blocking high-risk threats first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dudley
1 year ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one! I'm going with C and D. DLP policies at the bottom to catch everything, and high-risk blocks at the top to keep the bad stuff out. But B sounds right too - no need for that 'allow all' policy.
upvoted 0 times
Shizue
1 year ago
I agree, let's go with C and D for the policy ordering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
1 year ago
Yeah, that's a good point. B does seem unnecessary with the other policies in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
1 year ago
I think you're right, C and D make sense. DLP at the bottom and high-risk blocks at the top.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kara
1 year ago
But what about DLP policies? Shouldn't we place them at the bottom to catch any data leaks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 year ago
I agree with Fausto. It makes sense to prioritize blocking high-risk activities first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
1 year ago
I think the correct answers are B and D. You don't need an 'allow all' policy at the bottom since that would override all your other policies. And the high-risk block policies should definitely be at the top to catch those threats first.
upvoted 0 times
Veronica
1 year ago
No, DLP policies should be placed before high-risk block policies for better protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
1 year ago
So, we should place DLP policies at the bottom then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
1 year ago
Definitely, having an 'allow all' policy at the bottom would defeat the purpose of other policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
1 year ago
I agree, placing high-risk block policies at the top is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fausto
1 year ago
I think we should place high-risk block policies at the top.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel