Discuss Netskope NSK200 Exam Topic 3 Question 26

You are an administrator writing Netskope Real-time Protection policies and must determine proper policy ordering.

Which two statements are true in this scenario? (Choose two.)

AYou must place Netskope private access malware policies in the middle.

BYou do not need to create an 'allow all' Web Access policy at the bottom.

CYou must place DLP policies at the bottom.

DYou must place high-risk block policies at the top.

Suggested Answer: B, D

To determine proper policy ordering for Netskope Real-time Protection policies, you need to follow these two statements: B. You do not need to create an ''allow all'' Web Access policy at the bottom. D. You must place high-risk block policies at the top.These statements are based on the best practices for policy ordering recommended by Netskope3. An ''allow all'' Web Access policy at the bottom is not necessary because any traffic that does not match any policy will be allowed by default.However, you can create a ''monitor all'' Web Access policy at the bottom if you want to log all the traffic that is not matched by any other policy4. High-risk block policies at the top are important because they prevent any traffic that poses a serious threat or violates a critical compliance standard from reaching its destination.These policies should have higher priority than other policies that may allow or modify the traffic5. Therefore, options B and D are correct and the other options are incorrect.Reference:Real-time Protection Policies - Netskope Knowledge Portal,Create a Real-time Protection Policy for Web Categories - Netskope Knowledge Portal,Best Practices: Real-time Protection Policies (1 of 2) - Netskope

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

35 comments · newest first

Jacklyn 10 months ago

Wait, are we really not creating an 'allow all' policy? That seems risky!

Major 11 months ago

C sounds off, why would DLP be at the bottom?

Rory 11 months ago

A is correct, middle placement for malware policies makes sense.

Ernestine 11 months ago

I think B is misleading, you might still want an 'allow all' policy.

Alverta 11 months ago

D is definitely true, high-risk policies should always be prioritized.

Alisha 12 months ago

I’m pretty sure DLP policies should be at the bottom, but I might be mixing that up with another topic we covered.

Kassandra 12 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I think placing malware policies in the middle makes sense, but I’m uncertain about the specifics.

Adelaide 12 months ago

I feel like we discussed the importance of ordering policies, but I can't recall if the 'allow all' policy is necessary or not.

Rusty 1 year ago

I think I remember that high-risk block policies should definitely go at the top, but I'm not sure about the DLP policies.

Carman 1 year ago

Alright, I think I've got a good strategy. High-risk block policies at the top, Netskope private access malware policies in the middle, and DLP policies at the bottom. No 'allow all' Web Access policy required.

Lauran 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused on the proper ordering here. I'll need to review the Netskope documentation to make sure I understand the best practices for this scenario.

Chuck 1 year ago

I've got this! The key is to place the Netskope private access malware policies in the middle, and the DLP policies at the bottom. No need for an 'allow all' Web Access policy.

Cecilia 1 year ago

Okay, let's see. I know the high-risk block policies need to be at the top, but I'm not sure about the other statements.

Fannie 1 year ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the policy ordering to get this right.

Levi 2 years ago

Haha, this exam is like a maze of policies! I'm going with B and D. No 'allow all' policy, and the high-risk blocks better be at the top or it's game over. Netskope doesn't mess around!

Teri 2 years ago

↳ replying to Levi

I'm not sure about A, but I know for sure that 'allow all' policy is not needed at the bottom.

Buffy 2 years ago

↳ replying to Levi

I agree, B and D are the way to go. Can't risk missing any high-risk blocks.

Gilma 2 years ago

↳ replying to Levi

I think C is important too, DLP policies should definitely be at the bottom.

Nichelle 2 years ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about A. Putting the malware policies in the middle doesn't seem right to me. I'd go with B and D - no 'allow all' and high-risk blocks at the top. Gotta keep that network secure!

Benedict 2 years ago

↳ replying to Nichelle

Definitely, better to be safe than sorry when it comes to network security.

Nu 2 years ago

↳ replying to Nichelle

I think skipping the 'allow all' policy makes sense to avoid any unnecessary risks.

Natalie 2 years ago

↳ replying to Nichelle

I agree, having high-risk block policies at the top is crucial for security.

Clorinda 2 years ago

↳ replying to Nichelle

Yeah, it's important to prioritize blocking high-risk threats first.

Dudley 2 years ago

Whoa, this is a tricky one! I'm going with C and D. DLP policies at the bottom to catch everything, and high-risk blocks at the top to keep the bad stuff out. But B sounds right too - no need for that 'allow all' policy.

Shizue 2 years ago

↳ replying to Dudley

I agree, let's go with C and D for the policy ordering.

Catarina 2 years ago

↳ replying to Dudley

Yeah, that's a good point. B does seem unnecessary with the other policies in place.

Tennie 2 years ago

↳ replying to Dudley

I think you're right, C and D make sense. DLP at the bottom and high-risk blocks at the top.

Kara 2 years ago

But what about DLP policies? Shouldn't we place them at the bottom to catch any data leaks?

Terrilyn 2 years ago

I agree with Fausto. It makes sense to prioritize blocking high-risk activities first.

Teri 2 years ago

I think the correct answers are B and D. You don't need an 'allow all' policy at the bottom since that would override all your other policies. And the high-risk block policies should definitely be at the top to catch those threats first.

Veronica 2 years ago

↳ replying to Teri

No, DLP policies should be placed before high-risk block policies for better protection.

Mireya 2 years ago

↳ replying to Teri

So, we should place DLP policies at the bottom then?

Ashanti 2 years ago

↳ replying to Teri

Definitely, having an 'allow all' policy at the bottom would defeat the purpose of other policies.

Theodora 2 years ago

↳ replying to Teri

I agree, placing high-risk block policies at the top is crucial.

Fausto 2 years ago

I think we should place high-risk block policies at the top.

Netskope NSK200 Exam - Topic 3 Question 26 Discussion