New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Netskope NSK200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 1
[All NSK200 Questions]

Your organization has a homegrown cloud application. You are required to monitor the activities that users perform on this cloud application such as logins, views, and downloaded files. Unfortunately, it seems Netskope is unable to detect these activities by default.

How would you accomplish this goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kina
9 hours ago
Surprised that Netskope can't track this by default!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
6 days ago
I disagree, A seems more straightforward for access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
11 days ago
Netskope, huh? I bet the developers had a field day coming up with that name. Sounds like a sneeze to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
16 days ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe I'll just flip a coin and hope I get lucky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
21 days ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I'm just going to go with B and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
26 days ago
Option A is the way to go. Netskope Private Access is the solution for this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
1 month ago
I'd go with C. Decrypting the SSL traffic is key to monitoring those user activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
1 month ago
D is the answer, duh! Use the Chrome extension to create a new cloud app definition. Easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
1 month ago
I think adding the application as a steering exception might be similar to what we practiced in class, but I can't recall the exact implications of that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
2 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. If Netskope can't detect the activities by default, the obvious solution is to add the cloud app as a steering exception, which is option B. That should allow Netskope to start monitoring the user activities on the app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
2 months ago
I've dealt with similar issues before. I think the best approach here is to ensure the cloud app is added to the SSL decryption policy, which is option C. That way, Netskope can actually see and monitor the traffic to and from the app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
2 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. If Netskope can't detect the activities by default, we need to find a way to integrate the app with Netskope. Option D about creating a new cloud app definition using the Chrome extension seems like it could work, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
2 months ago
I remember we talked about how Netskope Private Access can help with visibility, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. SSL decryption is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
2 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Gotta make sure that cloud app is on the steering exception list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
3 months ago
I feel like the SSL decryption policy could be crucial for monitoring, but I’m not confident if it applies to homegrown apps specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
3 months ago
Creating a new cloud application definition with the Chrome extension sounds familiar, but I’m not sure if that would give us the monitoring we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
3 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. I think the key here is to make sure Netskope can actually see the traffic to and from the cloud app. Option B about adding it as a steering exception sounds promising, but I'm not sure if that's the whole solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like we need to monitor user activities on a homegrown cloud app, but Netskope can't detect them by default. I'm not sure which of these options would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel