Discuss Netskope NSK200 Exam Topic 1 Question 46

Your organization has a homegrown cloud application. You are required to monitor the activities that users perform on this cloud application such as logins, views, and downloaded files. Unfortunately, it seems Netskope is unable to detect these activities by default.

How would you accomplish this goal?

AEnable access to the application with Netskope Private Access.

BEnsure that the cloud application is added as a steering exception.

CEnsure that the application is added to the SSL decryption policy.

DCreate a new cloud application definition using the Chrome extension.

Suggested Answer: D

To monitor the activities that users perform on a homegrown cloud application, you need to create a new cloud application definition using the Chrome extension.The Chrome extension is a tool that allows you to record the traffic and activities of any web-based application and create a custom app definition that can be imported into your Netskope tenant1. This way, you can enable Netskope to detect and analyze the activities of your homegrown cloud application and apply policies accordingly. Therefore, option D is correct and the other options are incorrect.Reference:Creating a Cloud App Definition - Netskope Knowledge Portal

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

32 comments · newest first

Haydee 6 months ago

A mix of A and C might be ideal. We need both access and decryption.

Broderick 6 months ago

I’m leaning towards C as well. We need visibility into encrypted traffic.

Lanie 6 months ago

I like option D. Creating a new definition could give us more control.

Nickolas 6 months ago

Option B seems risky. Steering exceptions could lead to gaps in monitoring.

Vivan 6 months ago

I agree, but option A could work too. Private Access might help.

Cherry 7 months ago

I think option C is the best choice. SSL decryption is crucial for monitoring.

Brynn 7 months ago

D sounds a bit complicated for a quick fix.

Rebbecca 7 months ago

B is a good choice, steering exceptions are useful.

Kina 8 months ago

Surprised that Netskope can't track this by default!

Julieta 8 months ago

I disagree, A seems more straightforward for access.

Kelvin 8 months ago

Netskope, huh? I bet the developers had a field day coming up with that name. Sounds like a sneeze to me.

Hubert 8 months ago

Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe I'll just flip a coin and hope I get lucky.

Carolynn 8 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I'm just going to go with B and hope for the best.

Tambra 8 months ago

Option A is the way to go. Netskope Private Access is the solution for this problem.

Jennifer 9 months ago

I'd go with C. Decrypting the SSL traffic is key to monitoring those user activities.

Elouise 9 months ago

D is the answer, duh! Use the Chrome extension to create a new cloud app definition. Easy peasy.

Clorinda 9 months ago

I think adding the application as a steering exception might be similar to what we practiced in class, but I can't recall the exact implications of that.

Tarra 9 months ago

This seems straightforward to me. If Netskope can't detect the activities by default, the obvious solution is to add the cloud app as a steering exception, which is option B. That should allow Netskope to start monitoring the user activities on the app.

Skye 9 months ago

I've dealt with similar issues before. I think the best approach here is to ensure the cloud app is added to the SSL decryption policy, which is option C. That way, Netskope can actually see and monitor the traffic to and from the app.

Carry 9 months ago

Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. If Netskope can't detect the activities by default, we need to find a way to integrate the app with Netskope. Option D about creating a new cloud app definition using the Chrome extension seems like it could work, but I'm not 100% sure.

Sage 10 months ago

I remember we talked about how Netskope Private Access can help with visibility, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option here.

Cherelle 10 months ago

I think option C is the way to go. SSL decryption is key.

Daryl 10 months ago

Option B seems like the way to go. Gotta make sure that cloud app is on the steering exception list.

Nida 10 months ago

I feel like the SSL decryption policy could be crucial for monitoring, but I’m not confident if it applies to homegrown apps specifically.

Queenie 10 months ago

Creating a new cloud application definition with the Chrome extension sounds familiar, but I’m not sure if that would give us the monitoring we need.

Margot 11 months ago

Hmm, this is an interesting one. I think the key here is to make sure Netskope can actually see the traffic to and from the cloud app. Option B about adding it as a steering exception sounds promising, but I'm not sure if that's the whole solution.

Aide 11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like we need to monitor user activities on a homegrown cloud app, but Netskope can't detect them by default. I'm not sure which of these options would be the best approach.

Hannah 4 months ago

↳ replying to Aide

So many options! Which one do you think is the most effective?

Mireya 5 months ago

↳ replying to Aide

I wonder if creating a new cloud app definition would work better.

Tammara 5 months ago

↳ replying to Aide

SSL decryption policy sounds like a solid choice too.

Alpha 5 months ago

↳ replying to Aide

But what about adding it as a steering exception?

Glendora 6 months ago

↳ replying to Aide

I think enabling access with Netskope Private Access could help.

Netskope NSK200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 46 Discussion