Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope NSK200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 1
[All NSK200 Questions]

You are using Skope IT to analyze and correlate a security incident. You are seeing too many events generated by API policies. You want to filter for logs generated by the Netskope client only.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

For the use case of managed Windows-based endpoints where no clients or agents can be added, you can suggest that the customer use Netskope's Explicit Proxy. Explicit Proxy is a method for steering traffic from any device to the Netskope Cloud using a proxy server. There are two supported configurations for this use case: Endpoints can be configured to directly use the Netskope proxy by setting the proxy settings in the browser or the operating system to point to the explicit proxy destination provided by Netskope. Endpoints can be configured to use a Proxy Auto Configuration (PAC) file by downloading a PAC file template from Netskope and modifying it according to the customer's needs. The PAC file can be hosted on-premises or on the cloud and distributed to the endpoints. The other options are not valid for this use case. Endpoints do not need separate steering configurations in the tenant settings, as they can use the same explicit proxy destination and port.Endpoints do not need to be configured in the device section of the tenant to interoperate with all proxies, as this is only required for reverse proxy mode.Reference:Explicit Proxy3, [Explicit Proxy over IPSec and GRE Tunnels]


by Fatima at Apr 13, 2024, 12:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Raymon
4 months ago
Agreed with A, it's straightforward and effective!
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure A is the only way? Seems too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
5 months ago
A sounds correct, but I wonder if D could work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
5 months ago
I think B is the right choice, Tunnel is what we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
5 months ago
Definitely A, that's how you filter for the client logs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
6 months ago
I vaguely recall that using "neq Client" might be a way to exclude certain logs, but I’m not confident about that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether "Logs" would actually filter out the API events effectively. It seems too broad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
6 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to filter logs, and I feel like "Tunnel" was mentioned as a key term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
6 months ago
I remember we discussed the access_method filter in class, but I'm not sure if "Client" is the right option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
6 months ago
This is straightforward. The question clearly states we want to filter for the Netskope client, so option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
6 months ago
Ah, I see what they're asking now. We want to exclude the API policy logs, so option D using the "neq Client" query seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
6 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Shouldn't we be looking for the "Tunnel" access method instead of "Client"? Let me double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to filter for the Netskope client specifically, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
6 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
6 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the domain partition is the one we need to modify. The Employee-Number attribute is likely stored in the domain partition, so that's where we should focus our efforts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll need to think through how an entity's approach to defending or settling suits could affect its overall loss experience. Might be worth reviewing my notes on this topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
6 months ago
This seems straightforward - the null hypothesis is that the conversions for A and B are the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is A. White Box, since that's the type of testing where the testers have full knowledge of the infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
12 months ago
I'm with the majority on this one. Option A is the way to go. Though I do wonder if the exam writers threw in those other options just to trip us up. Sneaky, sneaky.
upvoted 0 times
Andrew
11 months ago
User 3: Yeah, let's not overthink it. Option A it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
11 months ago
User 2: Agreed, that seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
11 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option A and filter for logs generated by the Netskope client.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Haley
12 months ago
Hold up, Option D using 'neq Client' in query mode? That's a bit too fancy for me. Let's keep it simple and go with Option A.
upvoted 0 times
Kathryn
11 months ago
User 4: Agreed, Option A it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
11 months ago
User 3: Sounds good, let's keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
11 months ago
User 2: Use the access_method filter and select Client from the dropdown menu.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
11 months ago
User 1: Let's filter for logs generated by the Netskope client only.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elliot
12 months ago
Hmm, I don't think 'Tunnel' or 'Logs' in the access_method filter would work here. We need to specifically target the Netskope client, and Option A looks like the clear winner.
upvoted 0 times
Zita
11 months ago
Hmm, I agree. That seems like the best option to filter for Netskope client logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
11 months ago
A) Use the access_method filter and select Client from the dropdown menu.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurene
1 year ago
Option A seems like the way to go. I mean, filtering for 'Client' in the access_method makes sense if we want to focus on the Netskope client events, right?
upvoted 0 times
Shawnda
11 months ago
D) Let's try using query mode and filter for access_method neq Client to see if it gives us the desired results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
11 months ago
A) It's definitely the right choice to focus on the Netskope client events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
11 months ago
B) I agree, filtering for 'Client' will help narrow down the events to Netskope client logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
11 months ago
A) Use the access_method filter and select Client from the dropdown menu.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tuyet
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D) Use query mode and use access_method neq Client could also work to filter out logs not generated by the Netskope client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 year ago
I agree with Merissa, selecting Client will help us filter for logs generated by the Netskope client only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
1 year ago
I think we should go with option A) Use the access_method filter and select Client from the dropdown menu.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel