Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Netskope NSK101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 29 Discussion

Posted by Virgie on Jan 09, 2025 at 01:11 AM

You are setting up a real-time threat protection policy for patient zero to block previously unseen files until a benign verdict is produced by the Netskope Threat Protection Service. In this scenario, which two policy parameters must you configure? (Choose two)

Suggested Answer: A, D

To set up a real-time threat protection policy for patient zero to block previously unseen files until a benign verdict is produced by the Netskope Threat Protection Service, you need to configure the following parameters:

Block Action: This action ensures that any previously unseen file is blocked until it has been analyzed and a verdict has been reached. By blocking the file, the policy prevents potential threats from entering the network until they are deemed safe.

Remediation Profile: This profile defines the actions to be taken when a threat is detected. It includes configuring the alerts and responses (such as notifying administrators) when a file is blocked. This ensures that there is a process in place for handling detected threats and that appropriate measures are taken.


Netskope Threat Protection documentation detailing the setup of real-time threat protection policies.

Configuration guides for policy actions and remediation profiles in the Netskope platform.

Get Premium NSK101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
MA
Ma 10 months ago
I agree, the remediation profile could be important too!
HA
Harris 11 months ago
Wait, are we really blocking unseen files? That seems risky!
MI
Minna 11 months ago
Not sure about the CCL destination criterion being necessary here.
JE
Jeff 11 months ago
I think the file type activity constraint is also crucial.
MA
Maybelle 11 months ago
Definitely need the block action for this!
JU
Justine 12 months ago
I feel like the CCL destination criterion might not be necessary for this scenario. It seems more focused on the action and constraints instead.
MA
Mayra 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose parameters for a threat protection policy. I think the remediation profile might be relevant, but I'm not entirely sure.
LA
Lazaro 12 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the second parameter. I remember something about file type constraints, but I can't recall if that's the right choice here.
DE
Delmy 1 year ago
I think we definitely need to set the block action to prevent those unseen files from executing. That seems like a key step.
SH
Shonda 1 year ago
The key is focusing on the "real-time threat protection policy" and "block previously unseen files" details. I think block action and remediation profile are the two parameters we need to configure.
LU
Lucy 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the CCL destination criterion and file type activity constraint. I'll have to re-read the question carefully to determine if those are also required.
NI
Nickole 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is block action and remediation profile. Those seem like the most relevant options for this scenario.
JU
Judy 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We need to configure two policy parameters to set up the real-time threat protection policy.
AN
Anisha 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details before answering.
BI
Billi 2 years ago
Wait, is the answer 'all of the above'? I mean, who doesn't love a good threat protection policy with a side of comedy?
YO
Yolando 2 years ago
↳ replying to Billi
D) remediation profile
YO
Yolando 2 years ago
↳ replying to Billi
A) block action
BU
Buffy 2 years ago
I'm gonna go with B and D. Gotta set that remediation profile, and don't forget the CCL destination. What could possibly go wrong?
GO
Goldie 2 years ago
Oh snap, I totally got this. A and C, no doubt. Blocking the files and setting the file type constraints, that's the way to go!
NO
Noel 2 years ago
↳ replying to Goldie
User 2: Agreed, blocking the files and setting file type constraints is the best approach.
SU
Susy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Goldie
User 1: I think we should go with A and C for the policy parameters.
CL
Clorinda 2 years ago
I'm not sure about file type activity constraint. I think we should also consider configuring remediation profile.
MA
Magda 2 years ago
This is easy, it's B and C. You need to configure the CCL destination and file type to keep those threats at bay!
TA
Tarra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Magda
User 3: Got it, let's configure the policy with those settings to protect patient zero.
CH
Christiane 2 years ago
↳ replying to Magda
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. Those parameters will help block any unseen files until we get a benign verdict.
HU
Hubert 2 years ago
↳ replying to Magda
User 1: I think it's B and C, we need to set up the CCL destination and file type activity constraint.
ET
Ettie 2 years ago
I agree with Joanna. Those parameters will help us block unseen files until a benign verdict is produced.
OC
Octavio 2 years ago
Hmm, let's see... I think the answer is A and D. Gotta block those pesky files until they're proven safe, right?
HU
Huey 2 years ago
↳ replying to Octavio
Sina: Absolutely, those two parameters are key for keeping patient zero safe.
SI
Sina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Octavio
Xuan: And don't forget about configuring the remediation profile to handle any potential threats.
XU
Xuan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Octavio
User 2: Yeah, setting up a block action is crucial for real-time threat protection.
SH
Shantay 2 years ago
↳ replying to Octavio
User 1: I agree, we definitely need to block those files until we know they're safe.
JO
Joanna 2 years ago
I think we should configure block action and file type activity constraint.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel