New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-604 Exam - Topic 4 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-604 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 4
[All NS0-604 Questions]

A customer is consuming 30TB of capacity in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and is running enterprise file shares. However, only 10TB of capacity is actively being used. The customer wants to implement a cost-efficient solution in the Microsoft Azure cloud platform by using NetApp cloud products.

How can the customer achieve this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The customer is using 30TB of capacity in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP but only 10TB of this capacity is actively in use. The most cost-efficient solution in this case is to implement data tiering and optimization. Data tiering moves inactive or cold data to lower-cost storage (such as object storage in Azure), while keeping frequently accessed data on higher-performance storage. This strategy allows the customer to reduce costs by only paying for premium storage for the data that is actively in use, while moving less frequently accessed data to a cheaper storage tier.

Storing all data in the premium storage tier (A) would increase costs rather than reduce them. BlueXP backup and recovery (B) is for data protection, not cost optimization. Deploying an additional single-node Cloud Volumes ONTAP instance (D) would increase storage costs rather than optimize them.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Arthur
2 months ago
Data tiering and optimization sounds like the best option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
2 months ago
BlueXP backup is great, but not the main cost saver here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
3 months ago
Surprised they’re using 30TB but only need 10TB actively!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
3 months ago
I disagree, premium storage is too expensive for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
3 months ago
Implementing data tiering is a smart move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
3 months ago
I feel like deploying an additional instance might not be the best option here, but I can't recall the specifics on why that would be inefficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
4 months ago
Implementing data tiering sounds right to me, especially since they have so much unused capacity. It could help reduce costs significantly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question where enabling backups was mentioned, but I don't see how that helps with cost efficiency directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
4 months ago
I remember something about data tiering being a way to optimize storage costs, but I'm not entirely sure how it works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
4 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C. Implementing data tiering and optimization seems like the most cost-efficient solution to address the customer's needs in the Azure cloud platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
4 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. Based on the information provided, I think the best solution would be to implement data tiering and optimization using NetApp's cloud products. This should allow the customer to store the active data on premium storage while archiving the unused capacity to a lower-cost tier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the details here. The customer is using 30TB but only 10TB is actively used. I'll need to think through the different options to determine the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about optimizing cloud storage costs. I think the key is to identify the most cost-effective storage solution for the customer's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
6 months ago
Option D, really? Adding another Cloud Volumes ONTAP instance? That's overkill if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Cristina
5 months ago
C) Implement data tiering and optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Agustin
6 months ago
It might be more expensive in the long run, especially if a large portion of the data is not actively used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
7 months ago
But wouldn't storing all data in the premium storage tier be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
7 months ago
I agree, it will help reduce costs by moving less frequently accessed data to lower-cost storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
7 months ago
I think the customer should implement data tiering and optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
7 months ago
I'd go with Option B. Backup and recovery is crucial for that kind of enterprise data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
7 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Gotta love that data tiering and optimization!
upvoted 0 times
Ramonita
5 months ago
Yes, implementing data tiering and optimization can definitely help reduce costs and improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
5 months ago
Yes, implementing data tiering and optimization can definitely help reduce costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
6 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Gotta love that data tiering and optimization!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
6 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Gotta love that data tiering and optimization!
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel