An architect is building an AI workflow with data analysis that is being performed with TensorFlow inside Google Cloud. The architect wants to use the storage infrastructure to support NFSv4.1 with minimal management requirements. The architect also requires data protection and the ability to build rapid clones of the datasets.
Which storage solution satisfies these requirements?
Google Cloud NetApp Volumes (formerly known as NetApp Cloud Volumes Service) is the best storage solution for an AI workflow that requires NFSv4.1 support, minimal management requirements, data protection, and the ability to rapidly create clones of datasets. This service provides fully managed file storage with NFS support and integrates seamlessly with Google Cloud, offering features like snapshotting, cloning, and built-in data protection.
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP (B) is also a strong option but requires more management than Google Cloud NetApp Volumes. Google local SSD (C) and Google Cloud Storage (D) don't meet the requirements for NFSv4.1 support and dataset cloning.
An administrator needs to manage their company's critical containerized applications. These applications use non-NetApp storage for persistent volumes. The administrator needs to have a monitoring solution for both the entire container infrastructure and the application demands.
Which NetApp solution should the administrator use?
Astra Control Service is the best NetApp solution for managing critical containerized applications and persistent storage. It provides monitoring, backup, and recovery for Kubernetes workloads, even if they use non-NetApp storage. Astra Control gives administrators the ability to monitor both the container infrastructure and the demands of the applications, offering insights into performance, capacity, and health.
Other options like BlueXP Digital Advisor (A), BlueXP Classification (C), and BlueXP Observability (D) provide various types of infrastructure management and observability but are not designed specifically for containerized environments and application-level monitoring.
A company has SMB shares in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP in Azure. They need a local copy of the Cloud Volumes ONTAP shares in a globally accessible file system on their Microsoft Windows Servers 2022.
Which NetApp solution should the company use?
To provide a local copy of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP shares in a globally accessible file system on Microsoft Windows Servers 2022, BlueXP Edge Caching is the ideal solution. BlueXP Edge Caching allows users to cache frequently accessed data from centralized Cloud Volumes ONTAP shares at distributed locations, ensuring fast, local access while keeping the central storage synchronized.
BlueXP Tiering (A) is for moving cold data to lower-cost storage, BlueXP Copy and Sync (B) is for data migration and synchronization, and FlexCache (D) is primarily for caching in ONTAP environments but is not optimized for global accessibility in the Windows Server context.
A company is using Azure Virtual Desktop for their 2500 User VDI environment. They store user profiles on Azure NetApp Files using the Premium service level. There will be 800 new temporary users who need virtual desktop access.
Which two actions should the company take? (Choose two.)
To accommodate the 800 new temporary users in an Azure Virtual Desktop environment using Azure NetApp Files, the company should:
Move existing user-profile volumes from the Premium service level to the Ultra service level (B): The Ultra service level provides higher throughput and IOPS, which will support the increased workload from the additional 800 users, ensuring better performance.
Increase the volume quota size on existing user-profile volumes (C): Expanding the volume quota will ensure that there is enough capacity to store the profiles of the additional users, preventing performance issues due to storage capacity limits.
Global File Cache integration (A) and cross-region replication (D) are not necessary for this specific requirement of supporting more users in the same region.
A customer is migrating all data from a 6-node, on-premises NetApp FAS cluster to NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. The performance sizing determined that the destination can consolidate to two HA pairs.
What is the minimum number of Cloud Volumes ONTAP Instances required?
The company is migrating data from a 6-node, on-premises NetApp FAS cluster to NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and determined that they can consolidate to two HA pairs. This means that the minimum number of Cloud Volumes ONTAP instances required is 2, as each HA pair corresponds to one instance.
1 instance (A) would not provide the required redundancy and performance, and 6 instances (B) or 4 instances (D) are unnecessary given the performance sizing results.
Levi
2 days agoGaynell
4 days agoJeffrey
18 days agoLera
19 days agoOretha
19 days ago