NetApp Exam NS0-593 Topic 2 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-593 exam

Question #: 45
Topic #: 2

[All NS0-593 Questions]

A 2-node cluster hosts only NAS data UFs. All nodes lose access to the cluster network.

Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?

ABoth nodes race to takeover the other, one node will takeover the other node.

BNo takeover event will occur and NAS data UFs will not be accessible.

CAll nodes in the cluster reset and NAS data UFs are not accessible after reboot.

DNAS data UFs are accessible on only the node that has Epsilon.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, D

= To prevent file ID conflicts in a FlexGroup volume, you need to enable 64-bit NFSv3 and NFSv4 identifiers on the SVM that hosts the FlexGroup volume. This allows the SVM to use 64-bit file system IDs (FSIDs) and file IDs, which are unique across the cluster and can accommodate a large number of files. The -v3-64bit-identifiers and -v4-64bit-identifiers parameters enable this feature for NFSv3 and NFSv4 protocols respectively.Reference=Editing FlexGroup volumes,Enabling 64-bit NFSv3 identifiers on an SVM,NetApp ONTAP FlexGroup volumes --- Best practices and implementation guide

by Leonie at May 13, 2024, 11:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-593 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Myra

3 months ago

I'm stumped on this one. Maybe I should just start guessing and hope I get lucky. Or maybe I should just ask the proctor if they can give me a hint - it's not like they're going to judge me for it, right?

upvoted 0 times

Kris

2 months ago

Let's go with option D then, it seems like the safest bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

2 months ago

I agree, option D seems to be the most logical choice based on the scenario provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Misty

2 months ago

I think the correct answer is D) NAS data UFs are accessible on only the node that has Epsilon.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loise

3 months ago

Hah, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm going with B, since the nodes can't coordinate without the network, but who knows what kind of crazy fail-safes these systems have built-in?

upvoted 0 times

Lawrence

2 months ago

Yeah, it's definitely a tricky situation without the cluster network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorita

2 months ago

I agree, it seems like the NAS data UFs will not be accessible without the network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

3 months ago

I think you're right, without the network, there won't be a takeover event.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabra

3 months ago

D sounds like the right choice to me. Epsilon must be the key to accessing the NAS data, so only the node that has it will be able to access the UFs.

upvoted 0 times

Emogene

1 months ago

Exactly, that's why option D is the most logical choice in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wendell

2 months ago

So, if both nodes lose access to the cluster network, only the one with Epsilon will be able to access the data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Patria

2 months ago

Yes, it makes sense that only the node with Epsilon would have access to the NAS data UFs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

3 months ago

I agree, D seems like the correct choice. Epsilon must be important for accessing the NAS data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamala

4 months ago

I'm not sure about this one. It seems like C might be the right answer, since the nodes might reset and the data would be inaccessible after that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

4 months ago

I think B is the correct answer. If the cluster loses network access, the nodes won't be able to communicate and coordinate a takeover, so the NAS data UFs won't be accessible.

upvoted 0 times