New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-516 Exam - Topic 7 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-516 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 7
[All NS0-516 Questions]

A customer intends to use an E2812 system without expansion shelves. The specification for their Windows host requires that six E-Series data volumes be used.

In this scenario, how should the system be configured?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Understand the Requirements: The E2812 system is to be used without expansion shelves, and the customer requires six data volumes.

Consider DDP (Dynamic Disk Pooling): DDP is a recommended configuration for simplifying management and enhancing data protection.

Single DDP Configuration: Using one DDP for all volumes is efficient for the following reasons:

Simplifies the storage configuration.

Ensures balanced use of all drives.

Provides efficient data protection and rebuild performance.

Creation of Volumes: Within the single DDP, create six volumes as required by the customer.

Advantages of One DDP:

Easier management compared to multiple DDPs.

Better performance and protection due to the distributed nature of DDP.


by Gilberto at Jul 31, 2025, 12:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-516 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elena
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure six volumes can run smoothly without expansion?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
2 months ago
D could work, but why not just stick with A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 months ago
C seems excessive, one DDP per volume? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
3 months ago
I think B makes more sense for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
3 months ago
Option A is the best choice for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
3 months ago
I thought having one DDP per volume (option C) was a good idea, but it seems excessive for just six volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I’m a bit uncertain about whether two DDPs would really be enough for six volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like having one DDP for all volumes might lead to a bottleneck, so maybe A isn't the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
4 months ago
I think option B sounds right since dividing the volumes across three DDPs could help with performance, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
4 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option C is the right answer here. One DDP for each volume seems like the most logical way to set up the system, given the requirements. It'll provide the best performance and flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
4 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The question says the customer is using an E2812 system without expansion shelves, and they need six E-Series data volumes. Based on that, I'd say option D is the way to go - two DDPs with the volumes divided equally. That seems like the most straightforward and efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Does the E2812 system have a specific number of drive bays or something? I'm not sure how to determine the best way to configure the volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the best approach would be to go with option B - three DDPs with the volumes divided equally. That way, you get the benefits of redundancy and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
5 months ago
I agree with Alease, having one DDP for each volume would provide better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
5 months ago
Ah, the age-old debate of DDP configurations. I say we go with option B and call it a day. That way, we can spend more time playing Tetris on the host system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
5 months ago
Hmm, B sounds good to me. Wouldn't want to overload a single DDP, that's for sure. Gotta keep those volumes balanced!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
5 months ago
C) one DDP for each volume? That's a bit overkill, don't you think? I'd go with the more efficient B option.
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
2 months ago
But what if we need more flexibility later?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
2 months ago
Yeah, B makes sense for performance too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
2 months ago
I agree, C seems excessive. B is definitely more balanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
3 months ago
True, but for now, B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trevor
6 months ago
I agree with Shawn. B is the way to go. Gotta keep that data secure and speedy, ya know?
upvoted 0 times
Gail
5 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like the best way to keep the data secure and speedy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
5 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option B, three DDPs with the volumes divided equally.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mendy
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe three DDPs with the volumes divided equally would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
6 months ago
I think the system should be configured with one DDP for each volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
7 months ago
B) three DDPs with the volumes divided equally makes the most sense to me. Spreading the volumes across multiple DDPs will improve performance and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Alexia
5 months ago
It will definitely help with performance and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
5 months ago
I agree, spreading the volumes across multiple DDPs is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel