Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NCARB PDD Exam - Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for NCARB's PDD exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 1
[All PDD Questions]

An architect is rehabilitating a historic federal landmark that requires repairs to a garden wall. The existing brick appears to be in good condition; the mortar shows significant signs of deterioration.

Which strategy should the architect propose to repair the damaged wall?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

(PDD) Study Guide Reference

For historic masonry rehabilitation, the accepted approach (e.g., NPS Preservation Brief 2: Repointing Mortar Joints in Historic Masonry) is to hand-rake deteriorated mortar to a proper depth (typically 2--2 the joint width or until sound mortar is reached), avoid power-saw removal that can damage historic brick, and match the original mortar in composition, hardness, color, and tooling.

A is incorrect because removing all mortar for a ''uniform appearance'' is unnecessary and risks damaging sound joints.

B is incorrect because electric saws can chip and over-cut historic brick arrises, violating preservation best practices.

C is correct: careful hand removal of loose/deteriorated mortar followed by repointing with compatible mortar is the recommended method.

PDD Reference: Historic fabric protection under ''Codes/Regulations & Standards---Historic preservation,'' detailing of masonry repairs in construction documents (Division 04), and QA/QC specifications for repointing.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
An
1 month ago
I feel A balances aesthetics and preservation well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
2 months ago
Hand raking in option C preserves the wall's integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
2 months ago
Option B sounds efficient, but too aggressive for historic work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 months ago
I agree, but option C seems safer for the bricks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
2 months ago
I think option A is the best. Uniform appearance matters!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 months ago
Repointing is crucial, but A) might be overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
2 months ago
Hand raking is definitely the way to go, C) all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
3 months ago
Surprised that they’d consider electric saws for such a delicate job!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
3 months ago
I disagree, C) seems less invasive and more careful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
3 months ago
A) is the best choice for a uniform look!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
4 months ago
C) Remove loose mortar by hand raking the joints prior to repointing. Careful, don't want to accidentally uncover any hidden treasure in those historic walls!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
4 months ago
B) Completely remove deteriorated mortar with electric saws prior to repointing. Might as well bring in the power tools and get the job done quickly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
4 months ago
C) Remove loose mortar by hand raking the joints prior to repointing. Gotta love a good old-fashioned manual labor approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
4 months ago
A) Carefully remove all mortar and repoint all joints to achieve a uniform appearance. This is the most comprehensive approach to restoring the historic wall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
4 months ago
B) Completely remove deteriorated mortar with electric saws prior to repointing. This will ensure a thorough and efficient repair process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
4 months ago
I think option C is the safest bet. Hand raking seems less likely to disturb the existing brick, which is what we learned in our preservation workshop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
5 months ago
I feel like option B is too aggressive. I recall a case study where they used electric saws and it damaged the surrounding bricks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option A could lead to issues with the wall's integrity. We practiced a similar question where removing too much mortar caused problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'd have to think through the pros and cons of each approach more carefully before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards C. Carefully removing the loose mortar by hand seems like the best way to maintain the integrity of the historic brickwork.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of preserving the original materials in class. I think option C might be the best choice since it suggests a careful approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
5 months ago
C) Remove loose mortar by hand raking the joints prior to repointing. This will help preserve the existing bricks and ensure a more uniform appearance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
6 months ago
C is definitely the most careful approach. We must respect history!
upvoted 0 times
...
James
6 months ago
Option A sounds good to me - repointing all the joints to get a uniform look would be the safest way to restore the wall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B with the electric saws seems a bit risky for a historic landmark. I'd want to be really careful not to damage the bricks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
6 months ago
I think I'd go with option C. Removing the loose mortar by hand seems like the most careful and precise approach to preserve the existing brickwork.
upvoted 0 times
Eun
15 days ago
Option C is the way to go for preservation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
20 days ago
Exactly! We want to maintain the wall's character.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
25 days ago
Plus, it’s more precise than using power tools.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
1 month ago
Definitely! It keeps the bricks intact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
1 month ago
I agree, option C sounds the best. Hand raking is gentle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel