An architect is rehabilitating a historic federal landmark that requires repairs to a garden wall. The existing brick appears to be in good condition; the mortar shows significant signs of deterioration.
Which strategy should the architect propose to repair the damaged wall?
(PDD) Study Guide Reference
For historic masonry rehabilitation, the accepted approach (e.g., NPS Preservation Brief 2: Repointing Mortar Joints in Historic Masonry) is to hand-rake deteriorated mortar to a proper depth (typically 2--2 the joint width or until sound mortar is reached), avoid power-saw removal that can damage historic brick, and match the original mortar in composition, hardness, color, and tooling.
A is incorrect because removing all mortar for a ''uniform appearance'' is unnecessary and risks damaging sound joints.
B is incorrect because electric saws can chip and over-cut historic brick arrises, violating preservation best practices.
C is correct: careful hand removal of loose/deteriorated mortar followed by repointing with compatible mortar is the recommended method.
PDD Reference: Historic fabric protection under ''Codes/Regulations & Standards---Historic preservation,'' detailing of masonry repairs in construction documents (Division 04), and QA/QC specifications for repointing.
Lea
12 hours agoFrancoise
6 days agoJosphine
11 days agoMirta
16 days agoDannette
21 days agoMiriam
26 days agoYuette
1 month agoAlecia
1 month agoPilar
1 month agoRessie
2 months agoMattie
2 months agoCiara
2 months agoBrittney
2 months agoDeonna
2 months agoWillow
2 months agoKami
3 months agoJames
3 months agoKerry
3 months agoLinsey
3 months ago