Microsoft SC-300 Exam - Topic 4 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-300 exam

Question #: 45
Topic #: 4

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Microsoft 365 tenant.

You have 100 IT administrators who are organized into 10 departments.

You create the access review shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit tab.)

You discover that all access review requests are received by Megan Bowen.

You need to ensure that the manager of each department receives the access reviews of their respective department.

Solution: You add each manager as a fallback reviewer.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/governance/create-access-review

by Junita at May 03, 2022, 05:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jesus

5 months ago

Seems like a solid solution to me!

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

5 months ago

I thought fallback reviewers just get notified, not take over.

upvoted 0 times

...

Markus

5 months ago

Wait, won't that just confuse things more?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alesia

5 months ago

Totally agree, that should work!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mira

5 months ago

Adding managers as fallback reviewers sounds right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

5 months ago

I practiced a question about access reviews, and I think fallback reviewers only get involved if the primary reviewer doesn't respond. So, this might not solve the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aide

5 months ago

I feel like this might not meet the goal since Megan is still the main reviewer. Wouldn't the managers need to be primary reviewers instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Della

5 months ago

I remember a similar question where we had to set up access reviews, and I think fallback reviewers just act as backups, not primary recipients.

upvoted 0 times

...

James

5 months ago

I think adding each manager as a fallback reviewer could work, but I'm not entirely sure if it will redirect the reviews correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimbery

6 months ago

I'm leaning towards a prompt dialog. It seems straightforward to just keep asking for the date until a valid one is entered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruth

6 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand what it's asking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruth

6 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. Doesn't the question mention that there might be more than one correct solution? I wonder if there's another way to approach this that I'm missing.

upvoted 0 times

...