Microsoft MB-240 Exam - Topic 6 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-240 exam

Question #: 1
Topic #: 6

You work for a recycling company that provides customers with large compactor units to collect their recyclable materials. The compactor units are comprised of two separate components: a container to collect the recyclable materials and a separate component that compacts the recyclable materials to make them easier to transport.

These containers are expensive, and the components tend to break down frequently, requiring ongoing maintenance and repairs.

You need to easily track the containers that your company has at each client location and maintain a service history for each of the sub-components.

AConfigure the customer asset records hierarchically, and maintain service history at the sub-component level.

BConfigure the customer inventory records individually, in order to maintain the service history at the parent component level.

CConfigure the customer inventory records in a hierarchy, and maintain service history at the subcomponent level.

DConfigure the customer asset records hierarchically, and maintain service history at the service account level.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Fletcher at May 09, 2022, 04:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-240 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Stephaine

4 months ago

Wait, can we really track all that? Sounds complicated!

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardo

4 months ago

D? Really? That doesn't seem efficient at all.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

4 months ago

C makes sense, we need details on sub-components!

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

5 months ago

I disagree, I think B is better for overall management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

5 months ago

Option A seems the most logical for tracking repairs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yesenia

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the service account level in option D. It doesn’t seem to fit the need for detailed tracking we talked about.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leanna

5 months ago

I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to decide on hierarchical configurations. I think option C aligns with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashley

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think maintaining service history at the parent component level could be limiting. Maybe option C makes more sense?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonna

5 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of tracking service history at the sub-component level, so I think option A might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomoko

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. Damaged products could also be related to communication or convenience. I'll have to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tequila

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident the answer is 20%. Hackers are responsible for a significant portion of security incidents, but not the majority. 50% seems too high.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

5 months ago

This seems straightforward enough. The solution provided looks like it should meet the goal, but I'll verify the steps to be on the safe side.

upvoted 0 times

...