Microsoft AZ-400 Exam - Topic 4 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam

Question #: 95
Topic #: 4

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure pipeline that is used to deploy a web app. The pipeline includes a test suite named TestSuite1. TestSuite1 is used to validate the operations of the web app.

TestSuite1 fails intermittently.

You identify that the failures are unrelated to changes in the source code and execution environment.

You need to minimize troubleshooting effort for the TestSuite1 failures.

Solution: You increase code coverage.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Leigha at Apr 26, 2024, 09:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Malcolm

4 months ago

I think we need to look at the test logic instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mirta

4 months ago

More tests might just complicate things further.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

4 months ago

Wait, how does more coverage help if the failures are unrelated?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

4 months ago

Totally agree, it won't help with those random issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iluminada

5 months ago

Increasing code coverage doesn't fix intermittent failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

5 months ago

I feel like this is a trick question. Just because we increase coverage doesn't mean we minimize troubleshooting effort for those specific failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

5 months ago

I think increasing code coverage might help identify some issues, but if the failures are unrelated to the code, it probably won't solve the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorcas

5 months ago

I remember a practice question where we had to troubleshoot test failures, and increasing coverage didn't really address the root cause.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reed

5 months ago

I'm not sure if increasing code coverage will actually help with the intermittent failures. It seems like a separate issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maira

5 months ago

Ah, I see. Increasing code coverage might not be the best solution here since the failures are unrelated to the code. I'll need to explore other options that could help minimize the troubleshooting effort for these intermittent test failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. Increasing code coverage doesn't seem to directly address the problem of intermittent test failures. I'll need to think about other strategies that could help reduce the troubleshooting effort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

5 months ago

Increasing code coverage could help, but it might not be the best solution here. The question says the failures are unrelated to the code, so I'm not sure that's the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

5 months ago

Hmm, increasing code coverage doesn't seem like it would directly address the issue of intermittent test failures. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreta

6 months ago

Okay, let me see. If the failures are not due to code changes, then increasing coverage may not be the answer. I'll need to consider other options that could help minimize the troubleshooting effort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

6 months ago

Okay, I think I get it now. The issue is that the category ID is not enough to determine the level, since it can change over time. Option D about using getLinkId() seems like the right approach to fix that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aretha

6 months ago

Whoa, this is a complex scenario. I'll need to carefully review the TOGAF 9 guidelines to make sure I include everything required in the contract. Can't afford to overlook any critical elements.

upvoted 0 times

...