Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Marketo MCE Exam - Topic 10 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Marketo's MCE exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 10
[All MCE Questions]

A service level agreement (SLA) between sales and marketing requires that if sales marks a lead as Unqualified, an Unqualified Reason must be provided. The marketing team wants to nurture those leads.

What should be added as a flow step in a Smart Campaign to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Paulina
4 months ago
Totally agree with adding to SFDC Campaign!
upvoted 0 times
...
German
5 months ago
Wait, why would we nurture unqualified leads? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
5 months ago
Adding to Trash? That's just wasteful!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
5 months ago
I think adding to Nurture Stream makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
5 months ago
Definitely should add to Engagement Program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
5 months ago
I’m pretty certain adding to Trash is definitely not the right choice, but I’m torn between the Engagement Program and Nurture Stream.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
5 months ago
Adding to SFDC Campaign sounds familiar, but I feel like that’s more for tracking than nurturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
5 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to decide between adding leads to a campaign or a nurture stream. I think the nurture stream makes more sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
5 months ago
I think we need to add them to an Engagement Program, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
5 months ago
This is a great question to test our knowledge of integrating these two Salesforce clouds. I feel confident that option B is the right approach to set up the necessary customer tracking and data flow for an abandoned cart solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward best practices question. I'll start by considering each option and whether it aligns with typical workflow recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
6 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. The damaged disk areas are called "bad sectors." I'm confident that's the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question mentions the guestshell, so I'm guessing the issue is related to that. I'll focus on the options that directly address the guestshell.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
10 months ago
Ah, the old 'Throw it in the trash' approach. Classic marketing strategy. I wonder if they offer a 'Dumpster Diving' certification as well?
upvoted 0 times
Rupert
8 months ago
D: Add to Trash
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
9 months ago
C: Add to Engagement Program
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
9 months ago
B: Add to SFDC Campaign
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
9 months ago
A: Add to Nurture Stream
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
10 months ago
I'm going with C) Add to Nurture Stream. It's the only option that directly addresses the marketing team's desire to nurture the leads.
upvoted 0 times
Nenita
9 months ago
A: Definitely, it's important to make sure those Unqualified leads are still being nurtured for potential future conversions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
9 months ago
B: Yeah, adding them to a Nurture Stream will help the marketing team engage with those leads effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
9 months ago
A: I agree, C) Add to Nurture Stream is the best option to nurture those leads.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B) Add to Engagement Program and C) Add to Nurture Stream. Both of those options sound like they could work, but I'm leaning towards C since the question specifically mentions nurturing the leads.
upvoted 0 times
Youlanda
10 months ago
Yeah, C) Add to Nurture Stream aligns with the goal of nurturing the leads mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
10 months ago
I agree, C) Add to Nurture Stream seems like the most appropriate choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
10 months ago
I think C) Add to Nurture Stream is the best option for nurturing the leads.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
11 months ago
D) Add to Trash? Really? That's just going to make the marketing team unhappy. They want to nurture those leads, not throw them away!
upvoted 0 times
Howard
9 months ago
A) Add to SFDC Campaign
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
9 months ago
C) Add to Nurture Stream
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
9 months ago
B) Add to Engagement Program
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
9 months ago
A) Add to SFDC Campaign
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
9 months ago
A) Add to SFDC Campaign
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
9 months ago
C) Add to Nurture Stream
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
10 months ago
B) Add to Engagement Program
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
10 months ago
A) Add to SFDC Campaign
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Billye
11 months ago
I think C) Add to Nurture Stream is the correct answer. The marketing team wants to nurture those leads, so putting them in a nurture stream makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
10 months ago
Nurturing those leads can potentially turn them into qualified leads in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
10 months ago
I think it's important to make sure those Unqualified leads are still being nurtured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
10 months ago
Adding them to a nurture stream would definitely help in engaging with those leads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
11 months ago
I agree, C) Add to Nurture Stream would be the best option to nurture those leads.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keva
11 months ago
Adding them to a Nurture Stream makes sense, it will help keep them engaged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
11 months ago
I agree, nurturing those leads is important for potential future sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
11 months ago
I think we should add them to a Nurture Stream.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel