New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-683 Exam - Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-683 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 2
[All JN0-683 Questions]

You are deploying a new network lo support your Al workloads on devices that support at least 400 Gbps Ethernet. There is no requirement for any Layer 2 VLANs in this network. Which network architecture would satisfy this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Requirements for AI Workloads:

The scenario requires a network that supports at least 400 Gbps Ethernet and does not require Layer 2 VLANs. This setup is well-suited for a pure Layer 3 network, which can efficiently route traffic between devices without the overhead or complexity of maintaining Layer 2 domains.

Choosing the Right Network Architecture:

Option D: An IP fabric using EBGP (External BGP) is ideal for this scenario. In a typical IP fabric, EBGP is used to handle routing between spine and leaf switches, creating a scalable and efficient network. Since there is no need for Layer 2 VLANs, the pure IP fabric design with EBGP provides a straightforward and effective solution.

Options A, B, and C involve more complex architectures (like VXLAN or EVPN), which are unnecessary when there's no requirement for Layer 2 overlays or VLANs.

Conclusion:

Option D: Correct---An IP fabric with EBGP is the most suitable and straightforward architecture for a network that needs to support high-speed AI workloads without Layer 2 VLANs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Maile
3 months ago
D doesn't fit the requirements at all, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
3 months ago
Wait, are we really not using any VLANs? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
3 months ago
A seems a bit outdated for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
4 months ago
I think B could work too, but not as efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
C is the way to go for VXLAN overlay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
4 months ago
I feel like EBGP might not be the right answer here, but I can't quite remember why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where EVPN-MPLS was mentioned, but I can't recall if it specifically meets the 400 Gbps requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
4 months ago
I think EVPN-VXLAN might be the best fit since it supports overlay networks without VLANs, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
5 months ago
I remember studying about IP fabrics, but I'm not sure if PIM-SM is the right choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with all these network architectures, so I'll need to do a bit of research to understand the differences between them. Maybe I'll start by looking up what EVPN and VXLAN are, and how they compare to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
5 months ago
I think the answer is C - an IP fabric with an EVPN-VXLAN architecture. EVPN provides the Layer 2 and Layer 3 functionality we need, and VXLAN can handle the high-speed Ethernet requirement. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Since there's no need for VLANs, I'm guessing an IP fabric solution would be the way to go. The question is, which one? EVPN-VXLAN or EVPN-MPLS? I'll need to review the differences between those two approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The different network architectures seem quite technical, and I'm not super familiar with all the protocols and technologies involved. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward networking question. I think the key is to focus on the requirements - no Layer 2 VLANs and 400 Gbps Ethernet support. That should help narrow down the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
1 year ago
Dude, who needs VLANs when you've got EVPN-VXLAN? That's like bringing a knife to a 400 Gbps gunfight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
Ah, C is the clear winner here. VXLAN is the way of the future, man. Forget about those old-school VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
Anthony
1 year ago
Ah, C is the clear winner here. VXLAN is the way of the future, man. Forget about those old-school VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
1 year ago
D) an IP fabric using EBGP
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
1 year ago
C) an IP fabric with an EVPN-VXLAN architecture
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 year ago
B) an IP fabric using the EVPN-MPLS architecture
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
A) an IP fabric using PIM-SM to signal VXLAN overlay
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawn
1 year ago
I agree, C is the way to go. EVPN-VXLAN can handle those massive 400 Gbps links without a hitch.
upvoted 0 times
Son
1 year ago
C) an IP fabric with an EVPN-VXLAN architecture
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
1 year ago
B) an IP fabric using the EVPN-MPLS architecture
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
1 year ago
A) an IP fabric using PIM-SM to signal VXLAN overlay
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosio
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) an IP fabric using EBGP could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
1 year ago
I agree with Lorean, EVPN-VXLAN architecture would be the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) an IP fabric with an EVPN-VXLAN architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
1 year ago
Option C looks good to me. EVPN-VXLAN is perfect for a high-speed IP fabric with no need for VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
Miriam
1 year ago
I agree, EVPN-VXLAN architecture would be the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
1 year ago
Option C looks good to me. EVPN-VXLAN is perfect for a high-speed IP fabric with no need for VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel